I suppose it depends on which photos you are looking at. I looked initially only at
this one, which seems to me blatantly fake, as does
this one. The proportions and textures don't make sense to my eye, and you can see some funny business in each photo at the base of the cock. On the other hand, in
this one and
this one, the dick doesn't look impossibly disproportionate, though you can still see the signs of alteration in the image at the base of the penis in the second one. The
first of those two seems to me the most believable of the lot, but I still think that it is altered: if you look at the upper boundary of the cock near the base, there is an odd line.