That is correct. Obscuring names has never been allowed.So I just got a warning for obscuring names. What is that? Are you supposed to write the full name of the actors in a scene? I thought you WEREN'T supposed to do that.
That is correct. Obscuring names has never been allowed.So I just got a warning for obscuring names. What is that? Are you supposed to write the full name of the actors in a scene? I thought you WEREN'T supposed to do that.
I never knew that. I thought it was just the opposite that you weren't supposed to write the names of either the studio or the performer. Learn something new every day. Sorry for my mistake.That is correct. Obscuring names has never been allowed.
Context please?
I posted a vid and did not include the full names of the performers but used characters to block some letters of their names (which I thought was required) and received a warning that what I posted was in violation of the rules; posts should include the full names.Context please?
Neither did I. Now we know. But I also got a message that if I did it again I would be banned. Kinda harsh I think for a rule maybe not a lot of people know about obviously. No three strikes, two.I didn't know that rule.
Even better, the Chrome based Brave... which blocks everything you don't want, selects privacy options automatically, and without your interaction.It works great on Chrome. Make the switch.
Just go to 8:10 and save your time
Caption: The moment of impregnation.Just a short from twitter
Fucking hotNewer video from Diego. God his body turns me on so much now!
Fake cum. No faces. Not for me personally.excellent homemade clip—boy gets bossy with dad-top, insists: cum in my hole, ok, yeah?!
You guys have the eagle-eye for spotting fake cum. I'll have to take your word for it I guess. The only time it strikes me as fake is like on Sketchy Sex where the camera conspicuously cuts away right when the dude says "I'm cumming," and when it cuts back there's cum all over the place.Hot vid ruined by fake cum![]()
I mean if it was like iridescent or neon I would be suspicious. But cum comes in a variety of colors and consistencies. Whenever I'm getting sweet on some new fella, it's a source of excitement/curiosity: I wonder what his jizz is gonna be like? It's always different from my own and that of my previous gentleman companions. So...maybe you're expecting too much consistency, and you're disqualifying some spunk that isn't actually fake but just unusual?Wait. Wait. Wait. You don't how to tell the difference between fake cum and actual/real cum?
Fake cum is always way too thick, too opaque, and is way more than a person cums. It keeps cumming and cumming. It is thick like liquid soap. There is always a cut away before it cums out rather than a cock pulling out and it starting to dribble out. I've had many thousands of erotic massage clients over 3 decades and none of them had cum that looked like the fake cum that the studios use. If you choose to think it is real that is your right. -I mean if it was like iridescent or neon I would be suspicious. But cum comes in a variety of colors and consistencies. Whenever I'm getting sweet on some new fella, it's a source of excitement/curiosity: I wonder what his jizz is gonna be like? It's always different from my own and that of my previous gentleman companions. So...maybe you're expecting too much consistency, and you're disqualifying some spunk that isn't actually fake but just unusual?
Haha, no, you're making a good and clear point. Cum is an interesting subject. I think you should post a "demonstration" video if you get a chance. It might be fun to criticize, or whatever. I understand you and @Capitolhillguy are saying fake cum is just so distinct from the real thing that it's never a matter of doubt when you see it. Maybe so. But isn't this one of those points we should hesitate to complain about, since it basically amounts to the attitude: "All of this free porn people make for my enjoyment and consumption: it's just not excellent enough, and I would like to blame it for not meeting my standards of perfection." I think this is a point where we don't want to seem spoiled or over-entitled, and we're supposed to ignore the blemishes, since we're lucky just to have what we have... No?Got your point there BUT the color of fake cum and its consistency are essential to tell the difference between it and the real one. Real cum has different shades of white and grey where as fake cum is 98% white.
Also, when someone cums, they don't do it in BIG amounts, whereas "cum fakers" inject A BIG AMOUNT of that liquid inside asses.
In short, if the cock isn't shown pulsating, if you don't get to see the cum leftovers from the tip of the cock and if you see that THAT cum is way too thick/dense is definitely fake cum.
I'll upload a vid showing the difference between fake and real cum.
Sorry for my bad English. Not a native speaker to be honest. Have a good day.![]()
It is in the consistency. There is one thing that cum is not: uniform in color throughout. When studios use liquid hand soap (there's one in particular, but I'm forgetting the brand) and the cum oozes out and is opaque, white and slightly pearlescent then you know you have fake cum. Sketchy sex is renown for it.I mean if it was like iridescent or neon I would be suspicious. But cum comes in a variety of colors and consistencies. Whenever I'm getting sweet on some new fella, it's a source of excitement/curiosity: I wonder what his jizz is gonna be like? It's always different from my own and that of my previous gentleman companions. So...maybe you're expecting too much consistency, and you're disqualifying some spunk that isn't actually fake but just unusual?