Gay Guys Only: If you fuck bareback why do you do it?

[Rugbypup]

If two people love each other, are faithful to each other, now they are clean, whats wrong with BB?

If you know you're shagging around, are always after the 'next one' and not 'the one' and never check your STI status, not wearing a comdom makes you a twat.

Horses for courses.

In my humble opinion.

 

[deleted15807]

its strange people go on about gay guys fucking bareback yet straights fuck bare all the time and nothing is said about them doing it.
How can it be right for straights not to use condoms yet its bad if guys do it?

Not a very good comparision.

a.) A different more high risk population. Gay men typically have more
partners than straights which can dramatically increase risk.
b.) Vaginal sex does not carry the same risk as anal sex.

 

[Rugbypup]

Vaginal sex does not carry the same risk as anal sex by far.

Wow, really?

 

[dolfette]

Not a very good comparision.

a.) A different more high risk population. Gay men typically have more
partners than straights which can dramatically increase risk.
b.) Vaginal sex does not carry the same risk as anal sex by far.

plenty of straight couples have anal sex...i do!
and plenty of straight people have lots of partners.

same rules apply to all.

 

[DC_DEEP]

what planet are you on? LOL

fuck bareback if your partner is clean and you're monogomous.
gay or straight, makes no damn difference.

wear a condom if you or your partner have multiple partners or are not
tested.
gay or straight, makes no damn difference.

You make me all wet, dolfette!

It isn't about whether it's good/bad or right/wrong. If it is not in the context of an exclusive relationship (or even serosorting) it is irresponsible and unethical.

 

[2322]

ABSOLUTELY, I would NOT fuck a man or a woman w/o a condom, I love my life to much and I won't be responsible for the spread of AIDS. Anyone who does should be ashamed.

You mean that isn't you in that animation?

Well damn. There goes the neighborhood.

 

[dolfette]

Wow, really?

less risky but not "by far"

it's like jumping in front of a small car v jumping in front of a large car.
small increase in probability that you'll contract aids if you have unprotected anal over unprotected vaginal.

but nobody sane, whatever their bent, has unprotected casual sex of any kind!

 

[Industrialsize]

Not a very good comparision.


b.) Vaginal sex does not carry the same risk as anal sex by far.

WOW really.......tell that to all the people who are part of the AIDS epedemic in Africa where it is primarily a Heterosexual disease.

 

[dolfette]

You make me all wet, dolfette!

It isn't about whether it's good/bad or right/wrong. If it is not in the context of an exclusive relationship (or even serosorting) it is irresponsible and unethical.

i make me all wet too, baby :biggrin1:

yup, it's just about protecting yourself and protecting those you choose to be intimate with.

 

[Lex]

...
b.) Vaginal sex does not carry the same risk as anal sex by far.

Tell that to all the women who are discovering that they have HIV and/or other STDs.

Barebacking is just slow suicide. Period.

Wrap it up, regardless of orientation.

 

[Rugbypup]

I read somewhere that the mutation of the human red blood cell shape that lead to an imunity to the black death in 'some' people, is being researched because people with this blood mutation have an abnormally high resistance to the HIV virus.

It's amazing, i'll see if i can find a like.

 

[B_Monster]

You mean that isn't you in that animation?

Well damn. There goes the neighborhood.

If 2 people KNOW their HIV/AIDS status is negative for 1 year, its fine to go w/o a condom. That is if you trust that person and I do!!!

 

[deleted15807]

Wow, really?

Fuckin shocking isn't it?

Anal intercourse poses a higher level of risk than vaginal intercourse. During unprotected vaginal intercourse, the man is being exposed to vaginal secretions, and possibly menstrual blood as well. During anal intercourse, the man is being exposed to blood (bleeding is common during anal intercourse). Because blood contains higher levels of HIV than vaginal secretions, the risk of infection is greater during anal intercourse. Also, because of the increased amount of friction that occurs during anal intercourse, there is a greater chance for cuts/abrasions to occur in both partners. This makes HIV more likely to enter the bloodstream during anal intercourse (as compared to vaginal intercourse). Unprotected vaginal intercourse is considered high risk for both partners, but unprotected anal intercourse is considered even higher risk.

Forum on Safe Sex and HIV Prevention: Anal vs Vaginal Risk

 

[erratic]

If 2 people KNOW their HIV/AIDS status is negative for 1 year, its fine to go w/o a condom. That is if you trust that person and I do!!!

I agree. If you're at a point where you have trusted each other for a long enough period of time and you both agree, do without the condom if you so choose.

A lot of people get really keyed up about this topic, which I understand. HIV has killed a lot of people and hurt even more. But if there's no HIV there's no chance for transmission. Play as you please.

 

[2322]

Would I prefer to bareback? Yes.

Would I bareback while in a committed monogamous relationship following mutual testing and after asking myself if I TRULY trusted this other person (male or female) and said, "yes"? Yes!

Would I bareback any other time? No.

Have I had the opportunity? Have I been in throes of sex and asked to fuck without a condom? Yes.

Did I do it? No.

Have I ever barebacked without being in a committed monogamous relationship following mutual testing? Yes, a very long time ago and both my partners were virgins. I was a virgin in the first case and in the second I hadn't had sex with anyone other than two other virgins.

It was awesome and I loved it.

I know I may never be able to bareback again so I treasure those times when I did it. I count myself fortunate that I was able to do so without fear.

I definitely think there's something to be said for being able to have unprotected sex. I find the intimacy particularly intense and more spiritually fulfilling than with protected sex. For me, it's easy to see why barebacking is so seductive.

 

[dreamer20]

its strange straights fuck bare all the time ...

No they don't. The famous expression is still "No glove, no love".

 

[dolfette]

Fuckin shocking isn't it?

Anal intercourse poses a higher level of risk than vaginal intercourse. During unprotected vaginal intercourse, the man is being exposed to vaginal secretions, and possibly menstrual blood as well. During anal intercourse, the man is being exposed to blood (bleeding is common during anal intercourse). Because blood contains higher levels of HIV than vaginal secretions, the risk of infection is greater during anal intercourse. Also, because of the increased amount of friction that occurs during anal intercourse, there is a greater chance for cuts/abrasions to occur in both partners. This makes HIV more likely to enter the bloodstream during anal intercourse (as compared to vaginal intercourse). Unprotected vaginal intercourse is considered high risk for both partners, but unprotected anal intercourse is considered even higher risk.

Forum on Safe Sex and HIV Prevention: Anal vs Vaginal Risk

bolded the important part.

playing down the risk of unprotected vaginal sex is utterly irresponsible!
fact is, you can get aids from having unprotected sex just once.
quibbling over <5% variations in the odds is meaningless.

 

[erratic]

I can't believe I just okayed barebacking.

It's only because, if you're totally committed and monogamous and know each other is STI free you're really only risking a yeast infection under your foreskin or a urinary tract infection - and that's only if there's big ol dookies hangin around.

Barebacking serially, whether vaginally or anally, is clearly risky and, in my opinion, showing extreme disrespect to your partner.

 

[deleted15807]

bolded the important part.

playing down the risk of unprotected vaginal sex is utterly irresponsible!
fact is, you can get aids from having unprotected sex just once.
quibbling over <5&#37; variations in the odds is meaningless.

Hasn't stopped the porn industry(straight). In fact creampie genre is more popular than ever.

 

[dolfette]

Hasn't stopped the porn industry(straight). In fact creampie genre is more popular than ever.

nope, it hasn't.
and there've been aids cases because of it, despite all the testing they agree to.

imo, those people are just fucking morons.

bestiality porn is also big business.
so is bbw porn, despte the obvious and well known health risks.

anyone taking their safety and morality life lessons from porno films has some serious retardation.