Gay men have the biggest dicks?

baseball99

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Posts
871
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I am also wondering, since you said in PM that multiple people use your account, which one of you is writing the responses. Though one of the users of this account claims to be a doctor, I don't think it's fair that the rest of the LPSG readers may think this information is coming from a doctor (which automatically adds, to many people, legitimacy when posting on health-related topics) when it may well be coming from someone who is not trained in the sciences at all.
Every single person who may randomly use my computer are all in the medical field. I post 99% of all the information and occasionally one of them likes to act like he's in high school.....but whatever it's irrelevant bc i dont give medical advice. ALL the information i have posted on here can easily be looked up and i always recommend going to see a dr

I was not even going to respond to you in this thread at all, but making this statement that is blatantly about me to my housemate is a really crappy, juvenile, troll-like thing to do. I asked you leave me alone and put you on ignore only to hear that you are trying to get to me through someone else on the board? Lame.
Asked me to leave you alone? This is the first time i have corresponded with you since you spaz out. My response to JBT is frankly none of your business. I am not trying to get to you through someone else, please dont give yourself that much credit.....Lame for even thinking so
 

snoozan

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Posts
3,449
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
baseball99, over and over and over again on these boards you have gotten into tussles with other members because you try to lord your medical superiority over them and over and over you get shot down. when you get shot down, you resort to using big words that you think people won't understand to make yourself look better. it's tiresome and serves only to show that you really don't understand every facet of healthcare and the health sciences as you claim. after your big words fail to impress anyone, you start insulting or undermining the person whose posts point out the flaws in yours.

i don't think there are multiple people posting with your account. i don't think you're a doctor. i think your claim that multiple people use your account is because you like to PM the cute gay boys and tell them that you were never attracted to men before but the specific person you're PMing is making you think of changing your percentages. how many people have you PMed with that exact same line? i have no problem with people being gay or questioning their sexuality. what i have a problem with is that you are lying and being very sleazy by doing this to multiple people. you compound this nastiness by trying to cover it by saying multiple people use your account.

knowing all of this about you, i can't believe or take serious a word you say. i can just roll my eyes at your boorish, insecure, shitty attitude.
 

amouth4dxxxlgxxxthkck

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Posts
19
Media
3
Likes
0
Points
146
Location
ft. lauderdale, florida
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Just a thought, statistically, if there is one gay man out of 5 actual straight men, regardless of race, background or et ceters,
Doesn't seem logical that the sampling of men with the bigger cocks would be greater in the case of 5 men to one?
Maybe it's because staright men are just not as apt to pull their shlongs out as many gay men with big shlongs will?
The biggest cocks I ever sucked where straight mens'. The record 10 1/2 x 71/2 and that was real, I know..I had it down my htroat.
But then also a man with 9x7 which is nothing to cough at, well it is, but you know what I mean?
I met em playing team basketball, hangin out, talking about yeah, pussy and one day, I saw what they had in their pockets.
Stereotyping is an easy way of thinking and most of the time is far from truth, including the stereotype that gay men have the biggest cocks!
 

baseball99

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Posts
871
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
baseball99, over and over and over again on these boards you have gotten into tussles with other members because you try to lord your medical superiority over them and over and over you get shot down. when you get shot down, you resort to using big words that you think people won't understand to make yourself look better. it's tiresome and serves only to show that you really don't understand every facet of healthcare and the health sciences as you claim. after your big words fail to impress anyone, you start insulting or undermining the person whose posts point out the flaws in yours.
Interestingly, im the one getting "shot down" and im the one providing direct evidence. You get all hussy when I pull something up that directly goes against your belief. When I do this you get frustrated and then give up/take a jab at me. It's quite alright. I dont use big words without trying to explain them. My last post didnt have any big words in it other than what was what I copied and pasted on fMRI's. I dont understand every facet of healthcare, nor do I claim to. However, I am very well read on subjects and I know where to look when I dont know something. I also know who to ask. What I do know is my specialty and I know it well. Things like opthamology and even surgical procedures I have absolutely no idea about whatsoever and never would pretend to. But again, what I know, I know well and I dont try to impress anyone. Yes i am starting to work on a PhD. My buddy was originally a DO, then became an MD and now is workin on a JD.....he's probably one of the most immature people i know but it does not take away from his knowledge or abilities. You seem very very very insecure of a person. But again, I congratulate you on your success with your pharm degree.....no sarcasm, it must have been hard

i don't think there are multiple people posting with your account. i don't think you're a doctor. i think your claim that multiple people use your account is because you like to PM the cute gay boys and tell them that you were never attracted to men before but the specific person you're PMing is making you think of changing your percentages. how many people have you PMed with that exact same line? i have no problem with people being gay or questioning their sexuality. what i have a problem with is that you are lying and being very sleazy by doing this to multiple people. you compound this nastiness by trying to cover it by saying multiple people use your account.
You dont have to think im a doctor. Again, the only ones who it matters to are me, my patients, my school (well not so much), and the government to make sure that I pay back all my loans. I honestly dont care if some random person on the internet believes me or not. It will not effect me in the least.
Also, I'm very very happily married. I would not have done that if i was questioning my sexuality. I have way too much respect for myself (and my wife) to go into something not 100% sure
You can think im lying, again, i dont care. I currently live in a huge house where other people are living with us tryin to find places. I dont hide my computer or anything. One in particular likes to act like he's 16 and whatever thats his business. He's not going to steal information or harm my good name in any way. If he makes random posts on my name, whatever to be honest. As long as he doesnt give some horrible advice, etc

knowing all of this about you, i can't believe or take serious a word you say. i can just roll my eyes at your boorish, insecure, shitty attitude.
Dont be a hater just because someone else proves you wrong, its awfully immature

PS be mature and respond via private message
 

B_Hung Muscle

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Posts
3,025
Media
0
Likes
109
Points
193
Age
56
Location
NYC but never stop traveling
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I've stayed out of all these debates, and will do so again -- as regards the substance.

I did want to make one observation. There are a number of medical professionals on this board. I know at least two other physicians, and any number of RNs, LPNs, and EMTs. I don't have a practice anymore but I still do a lot of infectious disease research and visit a lot of sick kids on rounds.

Baseball, you cite a lot of selected studies in your posts that make for interesting reading, but you need to relax if someone disagrees with your conclusions. When you tred on very touchy issues -- over which there is great debate in the scientific literature (circumcision, homosexuality) -- you might want to exhibit some sensitivity to others. Bedside manner counts a lot: take it from one who learned this the hard way.
 

Lex

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8,253
Media
0
Likes
118
Points
268
Location
In Your Darkest Thoughts and Dreams
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
...
PS be mature and respond via private message

How can you respond on the open forum and then ask someone to be mature by taking it to PM? Open discussion on the board is how the most information is shared. I am an education researcher and I know that there is certainly at least one study proving the correlation between this and that (whatever you want this and that to be). Replicated research, over time, is what endures and even some of that research is dismissed because people don't LIKE it (the twin studies on homosexuality are an example).

...
Baseball, you cite a lot of selected studies in your posts that make for interesting reading, but you need to relax if someone disagrees with your conclusions. When you tred on very touchy issues -- over which there is great debate in the scientific literature (circumcision, homosexuality) -- you might want to exhibit some sensitivity to others. Bedside manner counts a lot: take it from one who learned this the hard way.

Finally--one of our long-standing resident doctors chimes in. I've missed you sexy. Thanks for adding your input.
 

baseball99

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Posts
871
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I've stayed out of all these debates, and will do so again -- as regards the substance.

I did want to make one observation. There are a number of medical professionals on this board. I know at least two other physicians, and any number of RNs, LPNs, and EMTs. I don't have a practice anymore but I still do a lot of infectious disease research and visit a lot of sick kids on rounds.

Baseball, you cite a lot of selected studies in your posts that make for interesting reading, but you need to relax if someone disagrees with your conclusions. When you tred on very touchy issues -- over which there is great debate in the scientific literature (circumcision, homosexuality) -- you might want to exhibit some sensitivity to others. Bedside manner counts a lot: take it from one who learned this the hard way.

My bedside manner is perfectly fine. Interactions on the computer are in no way related to or representative of "real life".....However, you should know that just bc something is repeated enough does not make wrong information correct. I tread on very touchy issues, yeh, but the world is way too afraid to potentially insult someone that things get way too watered down. I'm sorry but I will not digress just because something is "touchy" when research shows specific things. Have I pissed people off? Yep. Do I care? Nope. Most negative interactions have been with a very select few. Others may be upset too and never say anything. I also have gotten random PMs from people thanking the information. Sensitivity does not have to come with giving wrong information, take it from someone who learned this the hard way
I didnt come onto this board as an MD. I actually joined when a friend sent me the link bc at first i thought it was pretty funny. Then I saw some horrible advice and misinformation and figured I could do some good by putting some of that to rest or at least opening things to debate. At some point someone asked about my career so i told them. Some people have been fed misinformation so much they believe it to be true. If people get so worked up over this board, fine they need to chill out, its JUST A MESSAGE BOARD. If people dont want to see my posts they can block me. However, if someone challenges me, i will give it my best shot to defend what i know or believe. Am I wrong at times, of course. However, its just really funny how on this board bc of the apparent "sensitivity issues" things get blown so out of proportion yet on other bords they same exact things are blown off.
To be honest I've really considered cutting way back on my posting on this forum anyways. People seem to thrive better on rumors anyways. I think "doing the most good for the most people" no longer really applies to this forum anymore. I just feel really bad for all the people that will be fed such horrible information and actually believe it
 

baseball99

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Posts
871
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
How can you respond on the open forum and then ask someone to be mature by taking it to PM? Open discussion on the board is how the most information is shared.

bc i was being purely sarcastic with being hypocritical on my part.
 

ajay38

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Posts
46
Media
8
Likes
5
Points
228
Location
Maryland, DC
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Hmmm...I know lot's of gay men who love to wrestle almost more than they like sex. That being said I am not one of them...although if anyone wants to wrestle then have sex I'm game. As for gay men having larger cocks please god let it be true. I have a hard time buying into any of these studies about cock size and sexual orientation. I have an idea though let's write a grant proposal for a scientific study I'll be the primary investigator and you boys can start to line up now...what a dream job...I have my ruler ready and everything!
 

D_Bob_Crotchitch

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
8,252
Media
0
Likes
106
Points
193
I had a night out with the boys. I went with my buddy to his friend's gym after hours with about 12 guys I don't know very well. We played a spirited game of water polo. I have rarely played it before but I actually like it. As the beer flowed some speedos came off. I took mine off too as it was not very comfortable and being naked gave me freedom of movement. Most of the guys there were in great shape and married. One Marine guy was covering me and trying to block me. He made comments on my body and I made comments on his shape (although his stomach needs work). He was strong and aggressive with me and grabbed my waist and butt a few times. Long story short he made a pass at me in the steamroom as I layed there drinking my Corona Lite. I was shocked when he said and I quote "I know you don't act gay, but I heard you wrestled in college and since you have a big dick that is shaved I figured you would be gay"
No offence but I get upset when wrestling is linked to being gay.
Also, is there some kind of stereotype with big dicks and being gay that I don't know about?
The whole night was crazy.
Jake
PS Maybe I sterotyped him as straight because he is a marine.


Umm maybe it's because you act super macho and have a shaved weenie? Who knows? I never thought being a gay guy had anything to do with having a big dick. I do know some men both gay and straight that ARE big dicks. sheesh
 

fortiesfun

Sexy Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Posts
4,619
Media
0
Likes
77
Points
268
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
baseball99, thanks for the study information. It seems the three studies are all the same work of that lab in Sweden. I thought it was interesting, although what conclusions you draw from it, I'm not sure - that sexual orientation is at least in part biological, I guess? It would be interesting to see the study done among bisexuals. I hope we'll hear from fortiesfun about this. :wink:

Sorry, Matthew, for being so slow to respond to your call. I've been so preoccupied with the Is Triple Penetration Possible? and Crotchrot: Badge of honor, or potentially fatal disease threads that I had not visited this one for a while.

The debate on this thread is a largely a product of different disciplinary perspectives. In one camp we have the strict medical researchers, and in the other the gender studies folks. My bias is with the latter, so I am far from objective but I can say a couple of things here:

First, I am sympathetic to Baseball99's complaint about endlessly backing up assertions. It takes a lot of time and effort and often elicits little more than a few nods. The free nature of this place almost assures that the next post will be someone making ridiculous assertions based on purely anecdotal evidence, or misplacing a "Fictitious Stories" post. Still, to the degree we want to have a real conversation we have to do what we can to show the evidence, because without it we can't be sure how the conclusions were reached, what assumptions lies behind them, and if the conclusions logically follow from the data.

The big difference between the two disciplinary perspectives in my observation is that medical researchers, though meticulous about their data, are less critical about the assumptions that underlie their conclusions. The most questionable conclusion of all, counterintuitively, is that gay and straight are pure enough categories to be able to draw comparisons and contrasts.

From the gender studies perspective, much of the medical research program into sexual orientation is built on somewhat circular logic. Experiments which try to determine if there are physical differences between gay and straight men often start by making the most outrageous generalizations about the category to which their test subjects belong. (The famous experiment by Simon LeVay that JBT cites above, for example, compared the neuroanatomy of about a dozen men who died of AIDS contracted through male-male sexual contact with that of about another dozen men who died of AIDS which they contacted through drug use or by unknown means (In San Francisco, in the mid 80’s.) Lots and lots of people have cast doubt if those two categories are the equivalent of gay and straight. About he latter group, especially, the knowledge that they were IV drug users automatically meant that they were not also gay seems extremely dubious.)

Medical research also tends to accept the "inversion" theory of sexuality, that homosexuals are pathologically inverted versions of heterosexuals. (To his credit, Baseball99 explicitly rejects this premise early in this thread, but the always illuminating Capt. Nemo has shown how some of the linguistic constructions preserve it in the Swedish studies cited above.) There is no medical evidence of which I am aware for this assumption at all, but it recurs constantly.

The Swedish experiments into metabolism are among those that don't define gay and straight very well, so it is almost impossible to tell the validity of the test pools.

So, finally, to Matthew's question for me about bisexuals. This kind of research relies on a dimorphic model of sexual orientation, and so it sorts bisexual men into one of the two "major" categories based on their slight propensity for one gender over another and ignores their mixed nature. What a surprise: Bisexuals are one again the excluded middle. By definition they are excluded from the research, not by asking them not to participate, but by lumping their data into whichever group they most closely resemble. This raises the circularity problem, again, and gets us back to the concerns expressed throughout this thread. The only thing that can be confidently said about bi men is that they actually have the largest dicks of any group, not because of genetics, but because constant exercise causes growth. :rolleyes:
 
6

68306

Guest
Hey, just let me extrapolate the variances between the output of my random number generator and i'll tell you all what you wanted to hear.



Wait, it's done already :O

If you are gay, then yes gay men have the biggest.
If you are straight, then yes straight men have the biggest.
If you are bi, then yes bi men have the biggest.

If you are a girl wanting the biggest then simply wear a size-queen t-shirt.




The seconds of dedicated scientific research, backed by quotes from experts in the field...
"Oh it's Twue.... it's twue.... it's twue!" - Madame Von Schtupp.
"OMGCHUB!" - Chinkeh.
...has provided you with exactly the solution.

Now go forth and fight for your cause,.. knowing that the research of a medical student is backing you!
 

baseball99

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Posts
871
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Sorry, Matthew, for being so slow to respond to your call. I've been so preoccupied with the Is Triple Penetration Possible? and Crotchrot: Badge of honor, or potentially fatal disease threads that I had not visited this one for a while.
Dont forget the "im 27 inches, is this big enough?"

The debate on this thread is a largely a product of different disciplinary perspectives. In one camp we have the strict medical researchers, and in the other the gender studies folks. My bias is with the latter, so I am far from objective but I can say a couple of things here:

First, I am sympathetic to Baseball99's complaint about endlessly backing up assertions. It takes a lot of time and effort and often elicits little more than a few nods. The free nature of this place almost assures that the next post will be someone making ridiculous assertions based on purely anecdotal evidence, or misplacing a "Fictitious Stories" post. Still, to the degree we want to have a real conversation we have to do what we can to show the evidence, because without it we can't be sure how the conclusions were reached, what assumptions lies behind them, and if the conclusions logically follow from the data.
Thank you, finally.....constantly finding articles is time consuming and you know 99% of the people dont care and just wanted to see if you could post a good one

The big difference between the two disciplinary perspectives in my observation is that medical researchers, though meticulous about their data, are less critical about the assumptions that underlie their conclusions. The most questionable conclusion of all, counterintuitively, is that gay and straight are pure enough categories to be able to draw comparisons and contrasts.
This is where is I disagree with you to an extent. A line needs to be drawn somewhere, even if it is slightly more than arbitrary.....with more studies, research and refinement, that line can be adjusted to more accuracy. Think about Diabetes (a favorite example of mine).....DMII is "diagnosed" when a person has a fasting (non-eating) blood glucose (sugar) of a certain level.....currently that level ranges from lab to lab. That level has also been adjusted recently. Despite popular belief its due to drug companies wanting more money, researchers have found that people with a blood glucose at a previously thought to be safe level, have considerable microvascular disease and are actually diabetic......so the level was shifted down. Same thing with almost every condition or disease.....Heart failure is a number set based on research and perfusion capabilities and function of the heart. Hypertension numbers have been recently readjusted for similar reasons. Symptoms, signs, and values need to be grouped together to form a condition. I am not saying homosexuality is anymore of a condition than heterosexuality. There have to be criteria set, et etc etc......my honest theory into sexuality lies within neuronal tracts.....different percentages or numbers of tracts active or their interconnections between other parts of the brain could very well help explain sexuality

Even if something is a normal variation, it still needs set criteria for research. Homosexuality is similar to saying the word "tall".....If i call someone tall that may mean they're 7'.....to someone who is 5'1" someone who is 6' is tall.....those are perceptions but if we say everyone above 1 standard deviation of the mean height is considered tall, now we have set criteria for research.....as true or arbitrary as it is, it is the very least a set level on which now it is agreed. I hope my rambling made sense