what about clothed people?? you can photo a woman's bossom no matter how covered up she is
Yes, you can.
they're two separate incidents, is it not possible to discuss multiple incidents in one thread??
Not when you're doing what you are and that is equating one with the other. Because I can tolerate being photographed in public does not mean I can tolerate my sister being sexually assaulted.
so you don't care if your mother or a family member is photographed in a pornographic manner??
Being photographed wearing commonly worn garments in public does not make the photographs pornographic. The intent of the photographer does not make the photographs pornographic.
guess this answers my above question
I hope so because I'm at a loss to understand how you can draw all these parallels between photographs of people wearing ordinary clothing in public and pornography, sexual assault, pedophilia, and even arson. To my mind, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. More boggling was a previous example of your penis slipping out of jogging shorts and not being disturbed by it so long as when other people see it, they're not turned on by it.
It may surprise you to learn that other people routinely look at the sexual attributes of other people in public and most of the rest of the world isn't shocked by it. Indeed, many people in western society wear clothing and cosmetics that enhance their sexual attraction in public. Ever leave the house with a woman and she suddenly stops and says, "Oops, I need to put on my face!," and then runs to check her makeup? High heels, a very common type of shoe, is specifically designed to not only make women appear taller, but to cause their asses to be thrust further back and their busts to be thrust further forward. Women wear décolletage, and even enhancing brassieres in public all so that they look more sexually attractive.
Many men wear trousers that enhance their bulges, front and rear, make their shoulders appear broader, and their waists narrower. A few men even wear makeup and workout to achieve a chiseled body.
The fact is that people routinely dress to appear sexually attractive both in private and public. To deny that they do and to take offense that someone might find these attempts sexually appealing, is naive at least, disingenuous at worst. Some people, let's use nuns as an example, may purposely try to dress in the most unappealing sexual manner possible, but again, there may be men and women out there who find nuns in habits to be very sexually stimulating so even a nun in full habit may find herself the object of sexual attraction.
If a photographer wants to take a picture of someone in public because the photographer finds that person attractive, then the photographer can do so. In western society we acknowledge that each of us has a responsibility for our appearance in public. We may dress to be sexually appealing or not, we may sit or stand or walk in such a way that may be sexually appealing or not. As with the nuns, not everyone finds the same appearances to be sexually appealing, so there's no hard and fast rule about this. When we leave our homes we're taking a chance that some people may think we're hot, or not. A photograph in this instance, is a moment captured in time; it's a split second visual record of something we have done and place where we were. If we do something that appears sexually provocative to a photographer, then the photographer is free to capture that moment. That pose, that action, in that instant, was visible to everyone within visual range. The only thing that a photograph does is capture the moment of the action and appearance which we ourselves have offered to the public. That is why if we expose something that we didn't mean to or appeared to be doing something that we didn't mean to, it's our fault. We appeared or behaved that way in public. The photographer just happened to capture it on film.
We cannot control what the photographer does with that picture. It could end up in a newspaper, in a collage, maybe in a photo album, or yes, it could even end-up in a nightstand or the internet and promoted as masturbation material. We offered ourselves for public exposure, we were responsible for how we were dressed and how we acted. If others find it sexually appealing, then there is nothing we can do about it because we cannot control what others find sexually appealing. We just have to live with it.
Do not equate any of this with being nude in your home, being nude in a private place, undressing in a changing room, or taking photographs of nude children for prurient purposes. All of those are different situations which are addressed in law because those situations usually confer a legal expectation of some degree of privacy which does not exist in general public. Odd as it may sound, photograph a well-hung stud on the beach and you're legal. Photograph a well-hung stud in his jockeys in a changing room and you're not legal. There are exceptions to the rule, however in open general public, such as on the subway, sunbathing on a public beach, or walking down the street, expectations of privacy drop to nearly nothing.
