Gen. McChrystal disparages Obama and Administration in Interview, Ordered Home

[maxcok]

It doesn't really elevate Bush... I am just not thinking 100% clearly cause I haven't slept in 72 hours... But yeah, the guy should be fired.

Okay baby, you get a pass. You surprised me with that. Now go get some

 

[Trinity]

What you're doing is trolling, propagandizing and making a complete a** of yourself... as usual. Recognize your place under the bridge and step away from me, pronto.

Because you don't like and want to avoid the issues of the day when they reflect poorly against Obama does not make posting the issues of the day propagandizing or trolling. You are childish with your name calling.

After checking ou tthe politics forum a couple of times(I am not gonna say anything about Obama, the General or any other U.S. Politician, as I am not american, and it's not really any of my business) I have noticed that everytime I see a thread started by Trinity, it's something negative about President Obama. Looking at his/her/whatever he/she/it is post history, he/she/it has NEVER posted outside the politics forum!

I have posted outside of the politics forum on other topics than politics. My posts are backed up with articles which discuss the politics of the day. Obama and the Democrats are the subject of alot of political posts. Whether it is support or opposition, the posts are presented for discussion.

Trinity, you say you just want to post these things, cause others on here wouldn't post them, but I wonder: This is a SUPPORT SITE for LARGE PENISES, why is it necessary to post this here, other than the reasons Bbucko had mentioned earlier? To show up on google searches.....

Why is it necessary for anyone to post in the politics forum? Obama supporters must post here to show up in google searches, to push censorship of those who disagree with Obama and his policies and to forward Obama's agenda. How can LPSG allow it?

There is nothing wrong with posting about the RollingStone Interview with Gen. McChrystal that has the top General in Afghanistan recalled from theatre and yet there are those who want it (and any other story they deem doesn't reflect well for Obama) overlooked here in this political forum.

 

[B_talltpaguy]

From the Uniform Code of Military Justice:
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Uniform Code of Military Justice - UCMJ

THANK YOU for saving me the trouble of posting it... Case closed... All wingnuts/teabaggers/Republicans and anyone else who takes the side of McChrystal and his subordinates on this matter, is a piece of shit coward who deserves an ass kicking.

Obama either has to relieve McChrystal and anyone else implicated, of their command, or let them be court martialed and relieved anyways. Anything less would equate to Obama disrespecting the office he holds, and the honor of all presidents who came before him.

 

[faceking]

How funny... Obama reads the article that lightly criticizes him ASAP... yet I'm not he's STILL even f'ing read Arizona's SB1070 despite he and his entire administration pretty much lambasting it.

Thin skinned on his persona... absent on America. Pathetic.

Fucking focus fuckhead... you still are allegedly "angry" at the oil in the Gulf. Have you yet allowed international help?

 

[Pandora77]

True, you have posted outside the Politics Forum. In Et Cetera, Et Cetera, you made a few posts on Hillary Clinton. So your other posts might have been in another sub- forum, but they were still political.
I really wonder what big dicks have to do with politics......In other words: What brought you here in the first place. Everybody else on this site is here for the dicks, you are only here to bash Obama, hmmmmmmm

I have posted outside of the politics forum on other topics than politics. My posts are backed up with articles which discuss the politics of the day. Obama and the Democrats are the subject of alot of political posts. Whether it is support or opposition, the posts are presented for discussion.

 

[maxcok]

How funny... Obama reads the article that lightly criticizes him ASAP... yet I'm not he's STILL even f'ing read Arizona's SB1070 despite he and his entire administration pretty much lambasting it.

Thin skinned on his persona... absent on America. Pathetic.

Fucking focus fuckhead... you still are allegedly "angry" at the oil in the Gulf. Have you yet allowed international help?

FF in typical inimitable incomprehensible form tonight. Seriously, what drugs is this dude on?

 

[B_talltpaguy]

True, you have posted outside the Politics Forum. In Et Cetera, Et Cetera, you were bashing Hillary Clinton in 2008 in various threads. So your other posts might have been in another sub- forum, but they were still political.

Those posts were made to 'etc etc', because the politics forum hadn't been created yet, and that is where political threads went back then.

 

[b.c.]

....Why someone would want to use LPSG for such a thing is beyond me, however, it does make sense.

Maybe because there are just shy of half a million members of which nearly fifty thousand are active, worldwide.

I personally don't mind he/she/they posting bullshit in the guise of threadworthy topics (though the aforementioned google search issue does bear consideration), as long as we get to debunk the spin what it is: bullshit.

For example, the topic of this thread is spun as if it were a discredit to Obama. It seems to me a discredit the general.

Obama wasn't the one criticizing his commander in chief while on the battlefield, in the line of duty, presumably carrying out his orders, and acting under a chain of command. THAT's called "insubordination" folks.

He/she/they are making an issue of McChrystal being called home away from the field. He fucking well SHOULD'VE been.

IMO, only way this would turn out critical of Obama is if he doesn't CAN the general's ass.

 

[B_talltpaguy]

I have posted outside of the politics forum on other topics than politics.

Prove it with links then please...

prove that you actually make substantive contributions to the purpose of this site. Show us where you actively discuss big dicks, sex, relationships, friendship, sexuality, etc. Show us where you have posted your own information, pictures or videos relating to such things, and/or have provided 3rd party links to related information, pictures and videos to share with others... You know, the things that this online community actually exists to discuss, and what the overwhelming majority of this website's operation is dedicated to.

 

[midlifebear]

Well, considering the original source in the OP:

Alert the media: Trinity reads The Rolling Stone! Hey Trinity, quit being selfish and pass me the joint you're smoking! PFFFFFFT! :smile:

 

[Trinity]

Those posts were made to 'etc etc', because the politics forum hadn't been created yet, and that is where political threads went back then.

I didn't refer to political posts in the Etc., Etc. forum. As I stated, I have made posts on other topics than politics outside of the politics forum. Does discussing the Gen. McChrystal story and others like it really threaten your need to control this forum so much that you state things that are not true?

 

[midlifebear]

Whoa! Trin . . . don't get all paranoid. I think you've smoked enough. Maybe it's time you put that doobie down and chill. Q? :biggrin1:

 

[B_talltpaguy]

I didn't refer to political posts in the Etc., Etc. forum. As I stated, I have made posts on other topics than politics outside of the politics forum. Does discussing the Gen. McChrystal story and others like it really threaten your need to control this forum so much that you state things that are not true?

Prove it with links then please...

prove that you actually make substantive contributions to the purpose of this site. Show us where you actively discuss big dicks, sex, relationships, friendship, sexuality, etc. Show us where you have posted your own information, pictures or videos relating to such things, and/or have provided 3rd party links to related information, pictures and videos to share with others... You know, the things that this online community actually exists to discuss, and what the overwhelming majority of this website's operation is dedicated to.

 

[maxcok]

He/she/its first ever post was about kissing.

If I'm not mistaken, every post since has been political, and overwhelmingly bashing Obama.

's first ever thread, and as far as I can tell, the only one that has been nonpolitical:

:smile: The Kiss <.aaahhhh . . . weren't it sweet? (also it used happy faces then instead of rolly eyes)

I have posted outside of the politics forum on other topics than politics.

Really? Such as?? Show us.

First I'm a man, now I'm three people...

 

[Trinity]

Prove it with links then please...

prove that you actually make substantive contributions to the purpose of this site. Show us where you actively discuss big dicks, sex, relationships, friendship, sexuality, etc. Show us where you have posted your own information, pictures or videos relating to such things, and/or have provided 3rd party links to related information, pictures and videos to share with others... You know, the things that this online community actually exists to discuss, and what the overwhelming majority of this website's operation is dedicated to.

I don't have anything to prove to you. You posted that again as if you dictate some rule for this forum or site. I was clear the first time. I have made posts on other topics than politics outside of the politics forum.

 

[vince]

Prove it with links then please...

prove that you actually make substantive contributions to the purpose of this site. Show us where you actively discuss big dicks, sex, relationships, friendship, sexuality, etc. Show us where you have posted your own information, pictures or videos relating to such things, and/or have provided 3rd party links to related information, pictures and videos to share with others... You know, the things that this online community actually exists to discuss, and what the overwhelming majority of this website's operation is dedicated to.

I wondered this myself sometime ago and it's true. It did post outside the of the politics forum/topic. The very first post. http://www.lpsg.org/64814-the-kiss.html#post1055612

TK had the best reply. I miss that girl.

Of course the next post had something about Obama in the title. I didn't see any subsequent non politics posts, but I reckon they could exist.

 

[Trinity]

I wondered this myself sometime ago and it's true. It did post outside the of the politics forum/topic. The very first post. http://www.lpsg.org/64814-the-kiss.html#post1055612

TK had the best reply. I miss that girl.

Of course the next post had something about Obama in the title. I didn't see any subsequent non politics posts, but I reckon they could exist.

Does discussing the Gen. McChrystal story and others like it really threaten your need to control this forum so much that you need to focus on my post history- which has violated no rules - in order to avoid it?

 

[B_talltpaguy]

Ok, since Trinity refuses to reveal her post history... I'll do it for her...



As you can see by the corresponding links, this is a tabulation of Trinity's entire post history for the past year, broken down by forum...

First, the total... (1454 posts)
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060379

The portion of that total made to just the politics forum... (1439 posts, or roughly 99%)
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060386

All of the rest, combined... (15 posts, or roughly 1%)
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060395

You'll note that among this group, several of these posts were also made to political type threads, that happened to be in 'etc, etc'... Trinity has replied to what amounts to just a single non-political thread in the past year, and that was a thread about Michael Jackson shortly after he died.


And here's where it gets really entertaining...

The number of posts where Trinity has mentioned Obama by name... (1014 posts, or roughly 70% of all posts in the past year.
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060438

Within these 1014 posts, Obama's name is mentioned literally thousands of times. (Sometimes as many as 15 times in a single post, to even as many as 21 times in a single post)


The number of posts in Trinity's entire post history where Obama is mentioned by name... (1889 out of a total of 2667, or roughly 71%... and this is going back to 2006!)
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060457


And here's the real kicker... Within the politics forum over the past year, there have been 9995 posts by ALL members combined, which mentions Obama by name (as of the time of this post)...
http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=10060470

This means that as a single member of a forum that has tens of thousands of active members, Trinity alone has made over 10% of all such posts, but due to her flooding of each post with his name numerous times, accounts for what I conservatively estimate to be 20-25% of all instances where Obama's name is mentioned here...

That's right... You just read verifiable statistical evidence that Trinity, as a single member among nearly 50,000 active members accounts for roughly 1 out of every 5 times Obama's name is mentioned on this website... Or put more simply, Trinity mentions Obama by name roughly 10,000 times more frequently than the typical active LPSG member...

And Trinity does all of this while not making even the slightest, remotest contribution to this site's intended purpose.

So, is the user Trinity a paid political shill, or someone with a serious mental condition? You decide...

 

[Zeuhl34]

I wondered this myself sometime ago and it's true. It did post outside the of the politics forum/topic. The very first post. http://www.lpsg.org/64814-the-kiss.html#post1055612

TK had the best reply. I miss that girl.

Of course the next post had something about Obama in the title. I didn't see any subsequent non politics posts, but I reckon they could exist.

After scrolling through about 50 pages of posting history, I found Trinity has posted in non-political threads. However, after those roughly 50 pages, I found 6 non-political contributions. That would put Trinity at about 13 non-political contributions if the pace remained the same, and 13 out of nearly 2700 is not a particularly good ratio.

 

[Trinity]

Ok, since Trinity refuses to reveal her post history... I'll do it for her...

That's right... You just read verifiable statistical evidence that Trinity, as a single member among nearly 50,000 active members accounts for roughly 1 out of every 5 times Obama's name is mentioned on this website... Or put more simply, Trinity mentions Obama by name roughly 10,000 times more frequently than the typical active LPSG member...

And Trinity does all of this while not making even the slightest, remotest contribution to this site's intended purpose.

So, is the user Trinity a paid political shill, or someone with a serious mental condition? You decide...

You made no point that demonstrates anything other than that I have contributed to this website and violated no rule. In your obsession with me and my post history all you did was reveal your own mental condition.

After scrolling through about 50 pages of posting history, I found Trinity has posted in non-political threads. However, after those roughly 50 pages, I found 6 non-political contributions. That would put Trinity at about 13 non-political contributions if the pace remained the same, and 13 out of nearly 2700 is not a particularly good ratio.

There is no required good ratio rule of political posts to non-political posts.

This is about controlling views and information in this forum and censoring what those with opposing views have to say. Because you don't like and want to avoid the issues of the day when they reflect poorly against Obama.

My posts are backed up with articles which discuss the politics of the day. Obama and the Democrats are the subject of alot of political posts. Not just mine. Whether it is support or opposition, the posts are presented for discussion.

Why is it necessary for anyone to post in the politics forum? Obama supporters must post here to show up in google searches, to push censorship of those who disagree with Obama and his policies and to forward Obama's agenda. How can LPSG allow it?

You attack my posts because you can't stand to discuss the issues that don't reflect well on Obama. Period.