Genital size on a downward arc as intelligence is more treasured

Wyldgusechaz

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,258
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I am not putting forth any alternative hypothesis, and there is no problem with me denying the test. I am fully willing to believe absolutely everything you say, if you can prove it. How do we measure intelligence? As a neuroscience and psychology major, I can only say that I don't think it is possible to measure intelligence. You have to remember that the burden of proof here is on you. None of what you described sounds like a reasonable measure of intelligence to me, since every culture (and indeed, every person) on the planet places a different value on each of those things. If you take a mechanic with 2 years experience and an IQ of 90, along with a biochemistry major with an IQ of 130, and put them next to a broken car, I'll tell you who the genius is. Why is context so hard for you to understand?

Finally, intelligence and physical skills are of a completely different quality. Kind of like comparing apples and oranges, don't ya think? You are also going to have to define "race" for me. As I'm sure we all know, there are no genetic definitions for race. Perhaps the racial differences you are harping on about are synonymous with cultural differences. How about this; you take a bunch of "Mayans" and give them the interest in basketball (something which can be cultural) and the resources to learn basketball (also cultural), and then see how good they are. Just as good as blacks? You bet.

No I do not think so. Its all just neural connections, neural transmitters, biochemistry. Why would the ability of a brain to process and organize information be different than the ability of fast twitch muscle fiber performing athletic events?
 

D_Carroll Condomripper

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Posts
277
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
The original statement may be true, that powers are shifting to asian countries but connecting that shift with the size of a man's genital's is absurd.

1. USA has been, and still is, the most powerful nation in the world. Asians have always have smaller genitals.

2. Africa/Middle East is the birthplace of civilization. That's hard to do.

3. Women. It's absurd to think men make the earth revolve. Thats old-the-world-is-flat thinking.
 

Ethyl

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Posts
5,194
Media
19
Likes
1,707
Points
333
Location
Philadelphia (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
I've also heard that African males have an extra muscle in their legs that makes them better athletes than their white counterparts.

Oh, and Australians are naturally better runners because their ancestors were used to running away from the police when the land was nothing but a prison.
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
Argue what you may, try to be politically correct, but the size of male genitals is shrinking as a percentage of the whole population of the earth. Asians have the smallest genitals and the highest IQs, while Sub Saharan Africans have the lowest IQs and the largest genitals.

Do you know what a percentage is?

Considering that the population growth rate of sub-Saharan Africa is a lot higher than that of East Asia, it doesn't appear you do.:rolleyes:
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,677
Media
0
Likes
2,811
Points
333
Location
Greece
and their raw materials and minerals are being taken/stolen by the Chinese.

I admit that I haven't read anything else form this thread.

But what a fucking two faced moron you are.

Oh - so when the US takes what it fucking wants it's OK - but as soon as some little yellow cunt has the audacity to take some of the world's resources - well fuck me - how fucking dare they.

I haven't seen them invading for oil and lying about it. They buy it from the Iranians with the glut of $$$$ that they keep taking from you. Oh yes - reminds self - start war with Iran.

Racist, nationalistic half wit.

God help us.

Best rationalisation I ever heard for having a small dick.

:biggrin1:
 
D

deleted15807

Guest
To repeat myself, I still disagree with Wyldgusechaz about penises becoming smaller, as the credible poll I'm aware of indicates a correlation between height and penis size, and guys are getting taller. Someone stated that we all "know" there is no genetic definition for race.
Racial Groupings Match Genetic Profiles, Stanford Study Finds

Parse the sentence more carefully. Race has no genetic basis.....not one characteristic, trait or gene distinguishes all members of one so-called race from all members of another so-called race.

Additionally in that study you linked...

Risch admitted that few people in this study were of recent mixed ancestry, who might not fall into such neat genetic categories.

But it's those neat categories people continue to CLING to.
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
I admit that I haven't read anything else form this thread.

But what a fucking two faced moron you are.

Oh - so when the US takes what it fucking wants it's OK - but as soon as some little yellow cunt has the audacity to take some of the world's resources - well fuck me - how fucking dare they.

I haven't seen them invading for oil and lying about it. They buy it from the Iranians with the glut of $$$$ that they keep taking from you. Oh yes - reminds self - start war with Iran.

Racist, nationalistic half wit.

God help us.

Nah - you got the jist of it just fine..

Best rationalisation I ever heard for having a small dick.

:biggrin1:

I was waiting for someone to say that :biggrin1::biggrin1:
 

Wyldgusechaz

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,258
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Do you know what a percentage is?

Considering that the population growth rate of sub-Saharan Africa is a lot higher than that of East Asia, it doesn't appear you do.:rolleyes:


Demography

The population of sub-Saharan Africa was 770.3 million in 2006. [2] The current growth rate is 2.3%. The UN predict for the region a population of nearly 1.5 billion in 2050.[3]


East Asia is a subregion of Asia that can be defined in either geographical[1] or cultural[citation needed] terms. Geographically, it covers about 12,000,000 km², or about 28% of the Asian continent and about 15% bigger than the area of Europe. More than 1.5 billion people, about 40% of the population of Asia or a quarter of all the people in the world, live in geographic East Asia, which is about twice the population of Europe. The region is one of the world's most crowded places. The population density of East Asia, 130 per km², is about three times the world average.[citation needed]

Yes I do know percentages. Clearly you do not. (shooting fish in a barrel)
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
Demography

The population of sub-Saharan Africa was 770.3 million in 2006. [2] The current growth rate is 2.3%. The UN predict for the region a population of nearly 1.5 billion in 2050.[3]


East Asia is a subregion of Asia that can be defined in either geographical[1] or cultural[citation needed] terms. Geographically, it covers about 12,000,000 km², or about 28% of the Asian continent and about 15% bigger than the area of Europe. More than 1.5 billion people, about 40% of the population of Asia or a quarter of all the people in the world, live in geographic East Asia, which is about twice the population of Europe. The region is one of the world's most crowded places. The population density of East Asia, 130 per km², is about three times the world average.[citation needed]

Yes I do know percentages. Clearly you do not. (shooting fish in a barrel)

Growth rate, dummy. You said "shrinking" in your original post. Which, FYI, implies a rate of change, something your reply to me quoted above does not address.

I can understand you not comprehending what I'm talking about, but it's really rich when you don't understand the import of your own words. As usual, you're talking out of your ass. :rolleyes:
 

viking1

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Posts
4,600
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
To repeat myself, I still disagree with Wyldgusechaz about penises becoming smaller, as the credible poll I'm aware of indicates a correlation between height and penis size, and guys are getting taller. Someone stated that we all "know" there is no genetic definition for race.
Racial Groupings Match Genetic Profiles, Stanford Study Finds

Internet, and or any self reported polls aren't reliable. For any purpose...

Is not the whole thread absurd?

Yes. As soon as I saw the racial overtones, I knew this would turn ugly.
I wish the mods would lock it now...
 

Hellboy0

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Posts
2,367
Media
23
Likes
263
Points
208
Location
West Coast Australia
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Here is the question ( we are really far from my OP)

What if it is true? What if there is a difference in intelligence amongst races?

You say there isn't yet every measurable test, stat, performance says there is. This is where you need to answer.

Are we doing certain races a disservice by fostering the egalitarian notion that every has equal chance in intellectual competition when maybe they really don't?

'What if' is a real shitty premise for a discussion about this topic. Let's stick to facts and you haven't provided any that support your strongly-help OPINION.

You remind me of Joseph Mengele and his ilk (Josef Mengele, Angel of Death). He thought he was using a 'scientific method' to prove his fucked up ideas about race, too.

I defend your right to spew nasty bullshit. I just wish I didn't take the time to look at it.
 

OldPArtner

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Posts
167
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Age
39
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Parse the sentence more carefully. Race has no genetic basis.....not one characteristic, trait or gene distinguishes all members of one so-called race from all members of another so-called race
However, it is possible to use statistical correlations among several genes to cluster human populations together geographically, and it's interesting to note that what happens as you increase the number of clusters looked for by one is that one of the clusters splits up, as you can find in a couple images on Wikipedia based on published research.
Also, it turns out that in a sense, Indians are genetically more similar to the OP's "master race" than to the Kalash (who live in northern Pakistan), let alone to the Chinese.

P.S.: Look up "Lewontin's Fallacy"; just because humans share over 99% of their genes and about 85% of all human genetic variability is found within each ethnic group and most traits are distributed clinally doesn't mean that there is no genetic basis for race, though the "races" derived from the correlation structure of genetic data don't really correspond to the social constructs that matter in society.


P.P.S.: I bet the OP REALLY gets his fucking rocks off on sites like "My daughter's fucking a n-...uhh, black dude!" and the like:rolleyes:
 

Wyldgusechaz

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,258
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You idiot, read guns germs and steel.

I did. That book has been discredited. Just one of the premises in the book, that ONLY Europe has domesticable animals, is baloney. I live about 1 mile from a a huge herd of domesticated bison, used for food. Elk have been domesticated and are now used for food. Practically the whole gist of his book is that Australia and the Americas lack domesticable large animals due to extinction when it is clearly not true!!

That book was a crock. Measly old me just disproved one of his main ideas.
 

Guy-jin

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
3,836
Media
3
Likes
1,367
Points
333
Location
San Jose (California, United States)
Sexuality
Asexual
Gender
Male
You idiot, read guns germs and steel.

And read "The Selfish Gene" while you're at it.

You've taken J. Philippe Rushton's writing and made it your mantra. And then you claim to be intelligent.

Intelligent people who actually educate themselves in anthropology, human origins and evolution laugh at Rushton, not only because he's a crackpot racist whose "theories" are clearly unfounded, but because of the dubious sources from which he gets funding for his "research", his questionable methodology where most other anthropologists directly state that it's flawed and clearly biased against those of African origin, and his unethical practices in his experiments such as asking students in his department personal questions like how far they can ejaculate without informing them that it is an optional questionnaire.

You must have forgotten that there are people better-read and more intelligent than you on this forum, Wyld. That, or you're really that deep in denial about your own capabilities.

The main topic of this thread is sourced in something severely flawed. Anyone who's actually considering this topic, go ahead and do some research on Rushton, then do some research on what Wyld called "asshole Jared Diamond" (which includes not only GGS, but also "Collapse" as necessary reading, since he clarifies geographical determination in it to demonstrate that there is more to societal success and collapse than just geography) and draw your own conclusions about whose work you're more like to believe, given the research done in it.
 

Guy-jin

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
3,836
Media
3
Likes
1,367
Points
333
Location
San Jose (California, United States)
Sexuality
Asexual
Gender
Male
I did. That book has been discredited. Just one of the premises in the book, that ONLY Europe has domesticable animals, is baloney. I live about 1 mile from a a huge herd of domesticated bison, used for food. Elk have been domesticated and are now used for food. Practically the whole gist of his book is that Australia and the Americas lack domesticable large animals due to extinction when it is clearly not true!!

That book was a crock. Measly old me just disproved one of his main ideas.

Obviously, you didn't understand GGS.

It wasn't that bison couldn't be domesticated. It's that the Native Americans had no reason to domesticate them. Because North America was so vastly huge and they never reached a population density that would make domesticating them necessary. Bison roamed freely on the plains and were plenty easy to just hunt down as opposed to domesticating.

Maybe you should read it again. It seems you missed quite a bit of the points in it.
 

Wyldgusechaz

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,258
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
'What if' is a real shitty premise for a discussion about this topic. Let's stick to facts and you haven't provided any that support your strongly-help OPINION.

You remind me of Joseph Mengele and his ilk (Josef Mengele, Angel of Death). He thought he was using a 'scientific method' to prove his fucked up ideas about race, too.

I defend you right to spew nasty bullshit. I just wish I didn't take the time to look at it.

Here is what you are saying in fact: All races are equal in every way and white people must be lazy if they don't win the 100 meter dash and other races that don't match whites and Asians in academic achievement must be lazy or worse they culturally don't give a shit.

You may not realize it but yours is the worst sort of paternalistic racism. Ugly.
 

OldPArtner

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Posts
167
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Age
39
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
OH SNAP! I had heard bad shit about Rushton, but the thing about ejaculation takes the cake; how has this perv not yet been fired and prosecuted for sexual harassment?

I did. That book has been discredited. Just one of the premises in the book, that ONLY Europe has domesticable animals, is baloney.
Actually, it's more like only Europe had domesticable animals suitable for human transport, and IIRC bison can't be ridden...and also, u srs about *domesticated* bison?


Anyway, I have some more links that may be of interest to you, OP:
W.A.R. - WHITE ARYAN RESISTANCE
Vanguard News Network
WorldNetDaily - A Free Press for a Free People
NUKEISRAEL.COM
http://www.answp.org/
Blood and Honour Combat 18
Free Republic | latest articles
You get the idea...we had to deal with this shit from a "Christian Identity" person on another web forum, so I know it by heart.

Oh yeah, let me guess: Do you support Ron Paul for President?