You could always try getting into it, having fun with it, enjoying it, and supporting her through it, but hey, what do I know...Whatever kind of guy you are, you are, if there's no changing that, then who am I to say that's wrong in any way, for certain, that is.
Protection is there for a good reason, P exists for similar reasons to F and E, you might say. Similar, though, not necessarily the exact same, though some level of sameness may be their root, I wouldn't know, not for sure anyway.
If she's the girl, she's the girl, true dedication is, when it comes down to it, in different senses an act of submission, acceptance, agreement, protection, understanding, or any other act of relativistic co-ordination or co-operation in some usage whatever it may be.
The more important question is... are you the guy? More important to you, relativistic-ally speaking, do you want that girl enough to become the guy she's looking for? Inevitably, what works in any sense of relationship is finding that in both parties. It would not be unlike to compare it to "I am who I am, do I value this person enough to change who I am?".
Speaking Literally, Love and Evolution are linked concepts, Love, Evol, Evol, Love... Transitive property, linked concept that is fundamentally the same when removed from labels and considered cross-relativistic-ally. That question would be, in this context, "What is Love?" "Do you Love enough to Evolve to be better for the person or thing you love?".
But like I said, just a hypothetical philosophical theorem being tested for application across every systematic process that can be seen or experienced- more or less specific to whatever details and contexts are provided in advance. Which is really just me saying "I do not know...not for sure...yet" with a shrug and a blank face. Sorry if you were hoping for more, I don't know what to tell you.
I'll have to admit, I didn't bother reading most the thread so this could all be completely after the fact and at the moment worthless- but who knows, might be useful to someone sometime and it occurred to me to mention it. You could look at it as tangential, same basic principle, but it's really more triangulating. You could call it rambling, ranting, or a ridiculously long way to say anything, but that's the thing about being literally "beside" the point three times over, It's not "put this puzzle together" it's "connect the dots, figure out the center".
Anyhooo... Personally, I like a girl who likes to play, because if fidelity and faithfulness are a good ruler, then if she gets to with your permission, then equality and fidelity and faithfulness and freedom combined, then you can rightfully expect to be afforded an equivalent freedom in that faithfulness and fidelity of that agreement. Do it with protection, or with "surrogates" such as toys and it can be a personally chosen "trial" of willfully choosing an experience for the sake of another and seeing if you can learn to cope with the negatives or invert them and turn it into something useful or good in the end.
You see what you want to see, reality can be whatever you think it to be, you more or less literally get what YOU can make of it. How, Why, Who, What, When, Where are all more or less open to discussion, agreement, or relativistic coordination for whatever end purpose is intended or accidental throughout the process.
And all you get in the end is... when faced with a choice or a difficult to swallow fact or actual event...
"Y N-t?'-_o`;.)

"