Girls, enjoy recreational viagra -- yes/no?

[MoociMan]

Wtf, didn't expect to find all this hatred towards viagra. I mean, so what if it is a chemical. I bet most of you cannot really tell the difference between a guy with or without viagra. You seem to walk into the whole thing with a negative bias. Everybody on here are experts in everything concerning sex (according to themselves). So far I haven't read one good reason to view taking viagra as something wrong. Most appeal to emotion by using this kind of "its a cheat and a chemical"-rhetorics. Come on. Half the time you rave about how hardness is key to loving, then when the hardness is assisted it is bad. Lol.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

So far I haven't read one good reason to view taking viagra as something wrong.

You're not reading the same thread as me, are you?

getting a raw vag from hours of pumping is as sexy to me as used gum. that's not improving sex.

I am not interested in a drug abuser, and misuse of prescription medications is abusing drugs.

So he took it. My husband is already large and about at my limits. Well, this put him over the edge [...] he was too hard. Not only that, but all of his manners kind of went out the window. He had a brand new toy and was trying to find ways to use it. In short, it hurt. It was not pleasant, and I let him know it. He came twice and I never did, which is so rare I don't remember the last time.

I have used Viagra and Cialis, and I know this is about Viagra use, but I would say it has its downside, one I could never climax while having sex, [...] I would have a fricken erection that was good for nothing after my wife said "I give", her and I both did not like Viagra.

Yeah, Viagra itself is not likely to kill you with low blood pressure, but its inclination to lower blood pressure can be hazardous in combination with other drugs.

i've read a lot of recent studies that are linking the use of viagra to impotence too.

men who use it when they don't need it can actually give themselves ED.

i think that's pretty fucking frightening.

I`ve only used a quarter of a pill about six months ago with the GF to see what the effects would be. Well I did manage a rock hard erection that lasted a good two and a half hours with almost no down time in between orgasms (managed four in that one session, a rarity for me) and while I thought it was great the Gf not so much, she said being so hard actually hurt her in some positions.

BBC NEWS | Special Report | 1998 | Viagra | Viagra impotence warning

[...]but, basically, the superhard erections can cause internal damage to the penis.
that viagra can occasionally cause priapism is well known.

Medscape: Medscape Access

 

[ManlyBanisters]

You seem to walk into the whole thing with a negative bias. [...] Come on. Half the time you rave about how hardness is key to loving, then when the hardness is assisted it is bad. Lol.

You realy are unable to grasp this at all, aren't you? So now for the posts from the same posters that are positive.

If a man physically needs it, and gets a prescription, I'm okay with that.

[M]en of my age are starting to have erectile problems sometimes, so if they need it - go for it.

If he can't get hard and his doctor gives him Viagra, Ciallis, or whatever, fine, he should take it. I'll get the water.

in that situation, i'm all for viagra.

^ That in response to Aconitum's post about her husbands prescribed use to help with an ED issue.

I just said it was my preference and offered my opinion. If it's your thing, you have fun with it! :smile:

at no point in this thread have i said that i'm against it when it's needed and taken under medical supervision.

If it works for you, that's fantastic.

Are you unacquainted with the word "recreational"? The women who have objected have ONLY objected to the RECREATIONAL use of it.

 

[dolfette]

Fuck off.

lolz!

but he's so entertaining.
you pull the string and he goes for miles.

 

[dolfette]

Viagra could reduce men's fertility - 01 April 2004 - New Scientist

or

Questions and Answers about Viagra, Levitra, Cialis, and Revatio: Possible Sudden Hearing Loss

and

Serious side effects from the use of Viagra: Always-health.com

is someone feeling a little aggressive today?

 

[dolfette]

and it gets better!

again, from viagra's own site:
http://www.pfizer.com/files/products/uspi_viagra.pdf

Prolonged erection greater than 4 hours and priapism (painful erections greater than 6 hours in

duration) have been reported infrequently since market approval of VIAGRA. In the event of an
erection that persists longer than 4 hours, the patient should seek immediate medical assistance.
If priapism is not treated immediately, penile tissue damage and permanent loss of potency could​

result.

right there, in black and white, on the manufacturers information sheet, which you would have been shown had you gone to your doctor and been prescribed it legally.

that was fun :tongue:

 

[AlteredEgo]

. . .I may be a "nasty man" but at least I don't judge people like you do.
Now go on and lecture us from your rocking chair and post your opinions on us how terrible recreational use of a legal drug is, and tell us how bad we are for doing it. Last thing people want to hear is other people looking down at them for doing what they want to do, or what makes them feel better. I don't need your moral compass. If you had worded this better, you would not have had my response.

No one is looking down on you, jackass. (Except me, but not for the drug abuse, instead for the way you've abused the women in this thread.) We were SPECIFICALLY ASKED if the women here enjoy recreational viagra if we tried it, and if we'd want to try it if we had not. The OP states that he was curious to try it himself, but implied only if it seemed like it would help him score points with women. He said a woman he knew had reported not liking it, and he was seeking opinions. You, as man were asked nothing, by the way.

Pot. Kettle. Black. You chastise another poster for their choice of words, and then you come up with this gem, " recreational use of a legal drug". Um. . . duh. . . recreational use is illegal. What else are you using recreationally while you post? LOL

Answering a question is not passing judgement. I wouldn't want my husband, whose erections are perfect, to take any enhancing drugs. What you put in your body, and why is none of my concern; I just wouldn't' fuck you. I am uniquely qualified to make that determination. I pass judgement when I make that kind of decision, true enough. I have to discriminate. This pussy is too good to give to everyone who asks for a little, and frankly, I don't have the time. Do you fuck everyone who thinks they might like a roll, or do you set some standards and discriminate too?

Anyway. Rather than this pointless bickering, I would like to hear about Paigerox's "interesting" experience. A few ladies in the thread said they liked it (not that the assholes responding noticed) and I wonder if she did too. She didn't say.

 

[dolfette]

i wouldn't take so much as an aspirin without having read the manufacturers' warnings.
they are required by law to list the known possible side effects of their drugs.
when you go to a good, responsible, qualified doctor they will go over these risks with you and make sure you are aware of what you are taking.
if you are uncertain about any medicine, the first place you look is the manufacturer's information.

i know i was a bit naughty for stringing this one out, but i think it proves my point nicely. recreational users have not had the medical advice and may well have never even looked at the warnings and contraindications. how can you be certain you're taking a drug safely if you have never been told or found out how?

i don't want my sex life to be about playing ostrich with his health. i know some people will be mortally offended by my not wanting my sex life to unreasonably risk my partners health. i'm just a selfish bitch that way.

 

[1kmb1]

Now go on and lecture us from your rocking chair and post your opinions on us how terrible recreational use of a legal drug is, and tell us how bad we are for doing it. Last thing people want to hear is other people looking down at them for doing what they want to do, or what makes them feel better. I don't need your moral compass. If you had worded this better, you would not have had my response.

you clearly dont even know what is being discussed here. feel free to excuse yourself before you embarrass yourself further.

recreational use of Viagra is illegal, just like how recreational use of Vicodin is illegal. people that use Viagra for recreational use are whats known as a "drug abuser."

just ask raiders WR Louis Murphy

 

[706296]

I am surprised this topic is getting so many more posts about legalities than votes about women's preferences. If I wanted to try it "recreationally" all I'd do is tell my doctor about the times I've not been as hard as I'd like or as reliable as I'd like, ask if I could try it, and see what he says. That's not killing kittens or getting high on cocaine. It's no different than trying prozac to see if it makes you happier, or retin-a to see if your skin looks better -- both of those have risks and side-effects, but you try them out and see if the benefits outweigh the problems.

I do see the "viagra yes" answer is now leading 6-4 over the "viagra no" answer. Again, not enough posts on why women enjoy it -- assuming their partners were already capable of sex, do the women like him being harder, or lasting longer, or having a shorter recovery time, etc? Those are all very different answers.

 

[dolfette]

I do see the "viagra yes" answer is now leading 6-4 over the "viagra no" answer. Again, not enough posts on why women enjoy it -- assuming their partners were already capable of sex, do the women like him being harder, or lasting longer, or having a shorter recovery time, etc? Those are all very different answers.

private poll.
it doesn't count.
the votes may be almost entirely by men who use viagra and think they can answer for us.
when i post public polls, where you can see who voted for what, some of those types of guy don't notice and get caught out.

go by the replies, doll.
so far one girl said she loved it.

 

[dolfette]

both of those have risks and side-effects, but you try them out and see if the benefits outweigh the problems.

both of those, one would hope, you would have decided with the advice of a qualified doctor and with all the prerequisite health checks.

 

[B_Hickboy]

So you are trying to imply that women who've experienced sex with a man taking viagra recreationally and didn't enjoy it or women who don't like the idea of it but haven't tried it are somehow less sexual than you? Or that no man can perform for hours without help from a drug like this?

Hick manages just fine without it. As do plenty of other men, of all ages. So that's your 2nd implication debunked.

And plenty of the women who've posted in this thread about either not liking it from experience or not liking the idea of it have also posted about their love of sex and of enjoying sex for hours. So that's your 1st implication debunked.

No one here is saying that people who use viagra recreationally are bad people - there are several people saying they do not condone the unmonitored and unprescribed use of a controlled drug and that they wouldn't do it themselves. That's all. Horses for courses. No need to get your knockers in a knit. :smile:

My ex tried this once, with me. I didn't notice a difference, I don't think he did either - it was a generic and I think maybe it just didn't work. I was up for trying it once, I'm kind of glad it didn't work though, because I was concerned it would have developed a habit quite quickly - he was like that about other things.

BTW, Hick is 55.

*struts*

 

[dolfette]

BTW, Hick is 55.

*struts*

show us the boner!

 

[ManofThunder]

show us the boner!

The boner is a lie.

 

[atlclgurl]

So you are trying to imply that women who've experienced sex with a man taking viagra recreationally and didn't enjoy it or women who don't like the idea of it but haven't tried it are somehow less sexual than you? Or that no man can perform for hours without help from a drug like this?

Wow, what a bunch of nonsense you took from my simple post.

Those are "implications" YOU thought and not mine at all. I said I have experience with it and I liked it. I then said why I liked it and then sought to discount a someone extrapolating that the inevitable consequence of being with someone on Viagra is a "raw vagina".

That is all.

I cast no aspersions, please, don't put words in my mouth.

And to clear it up... NO, I don't think I'm more "sexual" than you or any other woman on here, I wouldn't know, having never fucked any of you.

As far as a man going for hours without the use of chemical stimulants, I have been with men who have gone for hours without the need for any kind of drug, the last time was this past Wednesday. (Although we did have to wait a bit for him to "reload".)

To re-iterate... I've done it, I liked it, I see nothing wrong with it.

Period.

 

[helgaleena]

Piers Anthony, the fantasy author in his 80's has written publicly about his use of one quarter of a tab of Viagra to keep his wife fully satisfied.

My man once took Viagra before meeting me one evening and I simply could not get him to relax after I was completely exhausted. He sheepishly admitted I was his second stop of the night, too, and that he'd had the pill. Obviously he didn't need it! Or at least he didn't need a standard dose.

I think this reliance on a pill, and one which is being sold over the net in adulterated unsafe knockoff form, too, is a fad that needs to die down soon.

 

[wiser_dude]

I need it (in that age group) and the headache before during and after sex is almost horrific. I've tried Viagra, Levitra and the other one (don't remember right now) and they all give me terrible headaches. If I didn't need to take it to get an erection, I absolutely would not.

 

[dolfette]

I need it (in that age group) and the headache before during and after sex is almost horrific. I've tried Viagra, Levitra and the other one (don't remember right now) and they all give me terrible headaches. If I didn't need to take it to get an erection, I absolutely would not.

that sucks big time.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

Wow, what a bunch of nonsense you took from my simple post.

Those are "implications" YOU thought and not mine at all. I said I have experience with it and I liked it. I then said why I liked it and then sought to discount a someone extrapolating that the inevitable consequence of being with someone on Viagra is a "raw vagina".

That is all.

I cast no aspersions, please, don't put words in my mouth.

I've been with a couple guys who took Viagra as a stimulant (no one needed it) and I've enjoyed it throughly. Maybe its just me, but I LIKE hours of sex, like not having to wiat and wait and wait for a "reload" and no one was "raw"!

So what exactly did you mean by 'Maybe its just me, but I LIKE hours of sex' - there is a clear implication there that the women posting against the use of viagra recreationally don't like 'hours of sex'. That's not something I inferred - it is a clear implication. And it is untrue.

And the 'not having to wiat (sic) and wait and wait for a "reload"' is also a clear implication that you believe men have to 'wait and wait for a "reload"' when not on viagra. That may be your experience, it isn't mine.