Polite and respectful.
Kind and thoughtful.
Principled, noble and possessing integrity.
And in case we haven't caught on to what a paragon you are, lots of men support you.
Why, you're sure to win the title of Miss something or other!
My vote would be for hubris.
You're presenting yourself on a pedestal and are either naive or vain enough to lap up the adulation you get.
It's not amazing that you've had men praise you for your oft stated sensitivity in this thread. Considering your first two threads of how talented your vagina is and your eagerness to please your man
of course you have men flattering you. Some of them are even intelligent enough to avoid the obvious sexual content and compliment the mind as it elevates them above the pure horndogs in our eyes. It's no more surprising than when a woman with amazing tits in her gallery gets male support for a dumb post.
What I find nauseating is your need to elevate yourself with advertising.
Plenty of us are polite, respectful, kind, thoughtful, principled, noble & possess both integrity and tact. For the most part we simply act on those qualities without having to say we have them as though we need them recognized. What you are is what you do, not what you say you are.
But, hey, if we're bragging, check it out. My finer qualities were so obvious that my bf in university found and bought a T-shirt that fit me to, well, a T. It read:
Beautiful
Intelligent
Thoughtful
Charming
Honest
And yes, all six are true.
Tact, for the record, would have been either giving a simple numerical answer or declining to post in this thread. Making fun of the OP for asking is not an example of tact. Saying that
you refuse to answer because you have "principles"
does imply that the OP and those who do answer lack principles. A very tactless remark. Tact, you see, is the ability to speak or act without offending others. You can't claim tact as a motive if you're oh so considerate of one group while casually insulting another.
I suppose I suffer from the problem of having principles that won't cave in to the influence of peer pressure or the anonymity of the internet.
Sorry.
That's not reading between the lines, nor is it taking them out of context. It's reading the lines as they're written.