Girth: a determining factor in what could be considered "big"?

girthyone13

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Posts
5
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
23
Location
Baltimore
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I've often thought about this very subject from time to time; and while talking to people over the years about dick size and what certain attributes land a dicks size into which/what category (average/above average/big). I have left out the more extreme size categories-tiny (4" and less) and large/huge (9" and up) because, let's face it, if you're tiny there's no amount of girth going to make you look remotely big and large/huge, well they are obviously already determined to be what I'm trying to determine in smaller lengths either with or without girth.
My question to y'all, the masses of LPSG (no I don't care if the question has been posted/asked before) is this: Can girth, when added to a dick's length-the above mentioned categories-make what was a prior average-sized dick into an above average or even big dick?
I've heard people complain about their partner's size; not BC it wasn't LONG enough, quite the contrary some were 8 or 9", but the fact was that they lacked the desired/average/expected proportionate girth. I know you may think that I have already answered my own question with the last statement, but I want to hear what yall have to say about the matter.
 
Ok, yeah that's what I would call a girthy cock. Now if it was 2" thinner, you MAY not think it would look much different, but BC obviously your cock is like 7" (?), the girth size would be closer to average than anything else. Thanks for the pics in your post although they weren't necessary, but were appreciated nonetheless, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niceguyheavydick
I tried to make this thread's point to someone else on this site a while back and I kind of got a more negative response. I don't think they completely grasped what I was trying to say at the point and time. As for myself, I'm 6.5-7"X6" girth, which-going by length alone would be considered above average (in the real world, lol. On this site, it's more like slightly below average, lol) but because I possess a girth that is about an inch thicker than what is considered "average"; my dick COULD be considered border line big (again, in the real world, not on this site, lol). It also helps that I have a fat, mushroom cock head that is the size of a doorknob, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flexxx
A larger than average girth does make a cock to be considered big. I never thought of myself as having a large cock because all we ever hear about are "hung" or long cocks. At +6.5" in length I never considered myself huge and was confused when sexual partners said I had a great looking cock which I thought was just average. I didn't realize the 6" girth pushed it into a new category that would not be considered big. Who knew?

I tried to make this thread's point to someone else on this site a while back and I kind of got a more negative response. I don't think they completely grasped what I was trying to say at the point and time. As for myself, I'm 6.5-7"X6" girth, which-going by length alone would be considered above average (in the real world, lol. On this site, it's more like slightly below average, lol) but because I possess a girth that is about an inch thicker than what is considered "average"; my dick COULD be considered border line big (again, in the real world, not on this site, lol). It also helps that I have a fat, mushroom cock head that is the size of a doorknob, lol.
 

Attachments

You are so right my friend. I frequently get called a "grower" even in person a few times because of my huge balls and girth when in fact I start off a good deal above average (5.5"-7") even when flaccid :confused:

I think the girth can count for a lot! But it can also make them seem shorter in appearance than they really are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notN2pussy
I think the girth can count for a lot! But it can also make them seem shorter in appearance than they really are.
True this. I have noticed that my length is often underestimated probably due to the bigger girth.
Girth still is king though :), And sure can move a shorter cock up in the size rank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notN2pussy