Girth - Penis Size Percentiles

Fencepost

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Posts
429
Media
3
Likes
791
Points
248
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I really didn't believe that I was thicker than average, until several ladies either commented or reacted to my dick's thickness. At 5.75" at thickest point (about 5.5" average), I fit into the 94% range. Bigger than 6% of all men everywhere? Still hard to believe, but the statistics say it is true. Ditto with length at BPL of 7.5". Depending on what survey you look at, my length is anywhere from 90% to 98%. Whodathunkit? It appears I am legitimately a well hung man. Gosh, I feel special.
 

mikephelps1

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Posts
115
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
38
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
I'm with you. More realistic sounding. Self measured though. I'm sure I come up with a bigger number than someone in a lab coat measuring for me. I squeeze and stretch first!

Trying to figure out why a thread from 2006 was bumped, but anyways...:confused:

This is complete garbage. Numerous things wrong with it. Firstly, it's self reported (as you pointed out). Not only is the penis size, but it appears the height is too, seeing as how the average height of participants was nearly 5'11". An inch to inch and a half taller than the average US man. So obvious and significant exaggeration going on.

Secondly, I see no mention of how measurements were supposed to be conducted or what tool was supposed to be used. There's not a single mention of "bone-pressed", or conversely; "non-bone-pressed" anywhere on the entire thing. That's an extreme flaw. Another flaw is the fact that there was no mention of the fact that a ruler must be used to determine length, not a soft tape, since length is a one-dimensional measurement, and tapes leave room for extreme error in this regard.

Lastly, the study claims to omit submissions in the "top 2%", yet we still see a max measurement (out of merely 3,100 participants) of 10.2". So we are to believe this study produced what this site (656,000 members and counting), the entire history of the porn industry and thousands upon thousands of other "dick pics" and web users haven't ever legitimately proven (BP or NBP) with a complete and accurate "hard ruler, penis perpendicular to the pubic bone, directly on top" measurement, couldn't? If we are to believe this, then apparently it shouldn't be too uncommon to find at least one 10"+ penis in a large high school or small college in America. And that's not even including the "top 2%" omission referenced earlier. This is utter nonsense.

If you're (not you, the author) going to go around masquerading this as in any way accurate or scientific (which it in no way is) at least fix some of these hideously obvious flaws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blonk

thickmike6969

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2016
Posts
236
Media
0
Likes
1,023
Points
313
Age
51
Location
montreal, canada
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Lotsa size exaggeration goes on unfortunately, even some tape measure pics are obviously doctored in some way. Attached are to photos of my wrist girth. Its just under 7" with the tape tight 6 7/8 " to be exact. following the curvatuture of my wrist almost 3" of tape are visible . this is on a wrist just shy of 7" girth. Ive seen pics claiming 7 to 7 1/2 inches of girth and you can even see 2" of tape across the top.
 

Attachments

thickmike6969

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2016
Posts
236
Media
0
Likes
1,023
Points
313
Age
51
Location
montreal, canada
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Lotsa size exaggeration goes on unfortunately, even some tape measure pics are obviously doctored in some way. Attached are to photos of my wrist girth. Its just under 7" with the tape tight 6 7/8 " to be exact. following the curvatuture of my wrist almost 3" of tape are visible . this is on a wrist just shy of 7" girth. Ive seen pics claiming 7 to 7 1/2 inches of girth and you can't even see 2" of tape across the top.
 

Draconis71

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Posts
1,559
Media
12
Likes
552
Points
333
Location
Ottawa (Ontario, Canada)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Lotsa size exaggeration goes on unfortunately, even some tape measure pics are obviously doctored in some way. Attached are to photos of my wrist girth. Its just under 7" with the tape tight 6 7/8 " to be exact. following the curvatuture of my wrist almost 3" of tape are visible . this is on a wrist just shy of 7" girth. Ive seen pics claiming 7 to 7 1/2 inches of girth and you can even see 2" of tape across the top.
Remember, a wrist is a lot FLATTER than a penis. Larger girth for smaller cross-section area. More oval than round.
Now, I have seen a few cheats with the pics, either folding the tape, photoshop, etc.
 

mako shark

Superior Member
Joined
May 8, 2009
Posts
4,280
Media
2
Likes
2,787
Points
358
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Exactly, my cock is closer to having a wrist turned sideways than being horizontal/flat.

Remember, a wrist is a lot FLATTER than a penis. Larger girth for smaller cross-section area. More oval than round.
Now, I have seen a few cheats with the pics, either folding the tape, photoshop, etc.
 

someperson

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Posts
4,091
Media
9
Likes
1,855
Points
198
Location
Los Angeles, California
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Lotsa size exaggeration goes on unfortunately, even some tape measure pics are obviously doctored in some way. Attached are to photos of my wrist girth. Its just under 7" with the tape tight 6 7/8 " to be exact. following the curvatuture of my wrist almost 3" of tape are visible . this is on a wrist just shy of 7" girth. Ive seen pics claiming 7 to 7 1/2 inches of girth and you can even see 2" of tape across the top.
if it was 7" girth it would be about 2.5" to 2.7" across mine hits 2.4"inches across @ 6.5" girth
 

Draconis71

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Posts
1,559
Media
12
Likes
552
Points
333
Location
Ottawa (Ontario, Canada)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I really didn't believe that I was thicker than average, until several ladies either commented or reacted to my dick's thickness. At 5.75" at thickest point (about 5.5" average), I fit into the 94% range. Bigger than 6% of all men everywhere? Still hard to believe, but the statistics say it is true. Ditto with length at BPL of 7.5". Depending on what survey you look at, my length is anywhere from 90% to 98%. Whodathunkit? It appears I am legitimately a well hung man. Gosh, I feel special.
Daamn... I'd LOVE to have a 5.75" girth x 7.5" length
I'd call it goldilocks, or so damned near.
 
D

deleted984925

Guest
98.9%. My cock is "fat as fuck", apparently. Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ste77

Magnumsized

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Posts
17
Media
29
Likes
3,287
Points
213
Location
São Paulo (Brazil)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I really didn't believe that I was thicker than average, until several ladies either commented or reacted to my dick's thickness. At 5.75" at thickest point (about 5.5" average), I fit into the 94% range. Bigger than 6% of all men everywhere? Still hard to believe, but the statistics say it is true. Ditto with length at BPL of 7.5". Depending on what survey you look at, my length is anywhere from 90% to 98%. Whodathunkit? It appears I am legitimately a well hung man. Gosh, I feel special.
Actually is even better than you think man! You are thicker than 94% of all the guys in the world! (Not only 6% as you said... the 6% in the chart means that only 6% of the man's in the world are thick as you are!!! )
Now you can feel fucking special lol