- Joined
- Feb 24, 2008
- Posts
- 2,138
- Media
- 44
- Likes
- 337
- Points
- 403
- Location
- Washington, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 80% Straight, 20% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Actually (to those who commented) the reason the moderators have done nothing official within this thread is because it is currently being discussed and no matter how much some people would love us to act on impulse and do as we wish (when it suits them ofc) that simply isn't how it's done.
My original post to this thread in no way means the discussion within the mod forum is over, and it is no reflection of any action we may or may not take with regards to this thread when the discussion is over.
I do hope that in your careful consideration and thoughtful deliberations the moderators will look not just at this thread, but the entire posting history of the user in question from his first appearance in this forum more than three weeks ago, including his inciteful, insulting posts here and in other threads, which have continued since your comments, Acon. If one reads his posts in order a clear pattern is plainly evident early on, and it is easily defined. I hope that the moderators will not be distracted by the usual complaint employed by such posters, that any attempt to reprimand them is a move to "censor" their opinions and ideology. That is nothing more than a dishonest deflection from focusing on a clear pattern of bad behavior in evidence from the beginning, a refusal to engage in serious discussion, capped by the user's own admission that his intention and his agenda is to be deliberately inciteful and provocative, in other words trollish. It's the same as what some others have admitted in the recent past with no apparent reprisals. Do we really need it spelled out?The thread is being monitored and rest assured, anything that needs to be discussed will be discussed.
Until a decision can be made by majority vote however, I suggest anyone taking issue with anyone else within this thread (not directed at you specifically) put said "individual" on ignore so that we can all avoid feeling the need to sink to other peoples levels.
Thanks got it. it would be nice if you let me know what policies i have violated, so as to not step on anyones feet
i really like glen beck alot, say what you want but i have never heard him speak negatively about anyone. Unbeknownst to you, if you dont listen , he does not preach any hatred. Yes there are lots of people that believe what he says, as i do. What is the problem and what has he said that makes you say what you are saying? It might be better understood if you say what it is that he is saying that makes you feel this way, rather than haphazardly saying what you are saying. Another words, site his words and your thoughts on what he said. From there leave the debate open, so we can discuss it further.
On the subject of distasteful persons on the forum I've not seen Hilaire since he and maxcock had their little dust up last week. Is Hilaire gone? I hope so.
Well I watched it and read it, its just Glen Beck, hes funny and goofy at the same time. He really truly means absolutely no harm to anyone. He has his view, goofy as it may be, he makes his points understood with big time generalizations. Like wishing harm to Michael Moore or poisoning Nancy Pelosi, be honest with this, Look at his video clip and how he is saying about Pelosi and he is totally laughing. Yes he is saying it in jest and i dare to say, it could be irritating to the opposing side. Do remember, when Nancy and Michael put themselves out in the public eye, they are fair game to comment on. Its not like we dont hear Michael Moore and Nancy Pelosi"s side on things. And last but not least, How about the left putting out a movie about assasinating President george W Bush? Is this not all the same?
Well I watched it and read it, its just Glen Beck, hes funny and goofy at the same time.
He really truly means absolutely no harm to anyone. He has his view, goofy as it may be, he makes his points understood with big time generalizations.
Like wishing harm to Michael Moore or poisoning Nancy Pelosi
be honest with this, Look at his video clip and how he is saying about Pelosi and he is totally laughing.
Yes he is saying it in jest and i dare to say, it could be irritating to the opposing side.
Do remember, when Nancy and Michael put themselves out in the public eye, they are fair game to comment on.
Its not like we dont hear Michael Moore and Nancy Pelosi"s side on things.
And last but not least, How about the left putting out a movie about assasinating President george W Bush? Is this not all the same?