Funny, the report I linked cites the same sources used by the site you posted (NOAA, etc.). ClimateComedyCentral gets money from government agencies, yet they claim to be unbiased? Right.
Have a look at the pdf.
Do you really think the National Center for Policy Analysis has no political agenda?
National Center for Policy Analysis
Do you really think Climate Central has no political agenda? Stupid question. All progressives are honest, tolerant, humble, and decent human beings with not one bit of greed in them. Uh huh.
Even Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, is calling shennanigans.
http://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...roof-humans-cause-climate-change-9159627.html
So let's not trust the politicians, on either side. Or lay people. I'm most inclined to listen to the scientists.
Of course, those on your side of the argument will usually counter that scientists can have biases of their own and are dependent on the politics of funding. Fair enough. But if, then, we can't give any credence to the findings of science, I'm not sure how else we can address this fundamentally scientific issue.
"People who know that they are morally superior to the rest of mankind are often tempted to ignore the moral norms on which Western civilisation depends. One of the most important of these rules is telling the truth. The Ninth Commandment states ‘Thou shalt not bear false witness….’"
This is how he begins a supposedly scientific treatise. But that shouldn't be surprising, given his lack of credentials in climate science, and his own political leanings.
Ray Evans
The problem is in disingenuous scientists, who place politics over real science. There is no denying they exist, just as there are doctors who promote medically unnecessary procedures based on their own personal beliefs and not medical fact.
You also have to remember that many scientists were put into positions as a result of political influence too.
Let's face it, humans are inherently flawed. If men were angels, we wouldn't need laws to bind them or hold them accountable, as is the case with governments. Rule of law is better than rule of man, whose whims and jealousies lead to loss of life and liberty.