Google and the Future of the Internet

B_big dirigible

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Posts
2,672
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Search engines have two distinct parts, the engine itself - the algorithm which tries to guess at what you're tring to find - and a database of web pages. The database is built up, and updated, by automated spiders or crawlers.

A new search company can be formed by anyone who believes that he can come up with a better set of search algorithms. This company can start operating more or less immediately, without taking the time to build up a database, because several of the major databases are available by subscription. If the new algorithm is indeed superior to the old ones, the company may eventually supercede other search engines, even those using the exact same database. Alternately, should a larger and more complete database become available, the new company could use its new algorithm on that improved database. And of course, new website database-gathering companies can enter the field at any time. Cheap storage makes this possible, and it gets cheaper by the day.

The thing to note is that no company can prevent another company from either putting a new search algorithm into operation, or from forming a new database. Nuisance suits based on alleged algorithm patent infringements might sometimes work, but are likely to be minor factors in the long run.

Therefore, should Google go astray; say, by allowing paid placements to dominate rankings, or by censoring sites (guns, sex, politics, competitors) by gimmicking either the algorithms or the databases, it will soon find itself eclipsed by other search engines which don't do the same.

The only company currently in the search engine business which I'd suspect of gimmicking results (not so much now, but possibly in the future) for PC reasons would be MSN. The spiders which are most active on my web sites are Googlebot, MSNbot, Inktomi Slurp (the database used by Yahoo Search), Alexa, AskJeeves, and several which my usual stats packages can't identify. That's quite a few, and there may well be more in the future. So even if one or more start gimmicking searches (for our own good, of course!), who cares?
 

Caelestis

Just Browsing
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Posts
87
Media
6
Likes
0
Points
151
Age
43
Location
England, UK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Google Announces Plan To Destroy All Information It Can't Index | The Onion - America's Finest News Source

I don't believe Google will ever gain total dominance. It's dominance is based on trust in a world full of competitors. As people get concerned about their privacy, they'll move to Yahoo, Microsoft etc, etc. It's not like Microsoft's software monopoly where choosing a competitor automatically reduces your access to software (I admit emulators and open-source, multi-platform software is softening this effect). Choosing a new search engine doesn't change your access to information.

If Google appears to be turning "evil", it won't be long until a new company will pop up with their version of "Don't be evil" and the cycle begins anew.
 

D_Martin van Burden

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
3,229
Media
0
Likes
41
Points
258
I'm not threatened either. In fact, I hear nothing but good things and I don't feel skeptical about the claims. Maybe it's because I really believe that there are companies out there who, while earning profits, don't forget about fair business practices or environmental support or creating decent jobs. If Google starts winding up in antitrust ordeals, then perhaps I'll reconsider.