Greek gods all have one thing in common

Guy-jin

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
3,836
Media
3
Likes
1,367
Points
333
Location
San Jose (California, United States)
Sexuality
Asexual
Gender
Male
PEDANT ALERT

Roman Forums, Greek Agorai. Mr. Els wouldn't wish me to let that one pass. :smile:

Still, funny one Guy.

Haha! Haven't gotten to that chapter in my Greek lessons yet I guess. :wink:

Yet you let his use of a singular verb with the plural noun "genitalia" pass without comment.

It's okay, I forgive him for it.

Speaking only Japanese for three weeks can be murder to your grammar when your mind starts to go back to English. :biggrin1:
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
I owe you a thank you for your holiday greeting, H. As you may have noticed, I've been gone for quite a while. But my adoration for you continues unabated. :biggrin1:
My antennae, their sharpness unabated, had already delivered this gud noose, Nick.
But thank you.


One never has to apologize for good manners, Cal. :wink:
I sense a tie vote here.
 

silvertriumph2

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
5,678
Media
22
Likes
7,404
Points
368
Location
Eastcoast USA (NYC-Manhattan)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Not all Greek and Roman gods were small--meet Priapus. He was the god of livestock, gardens, fertility and (not surprisingly) male genitalia. He was fortunate (or unfortunate) enough to have a permanent erection. Statues were often placed in and around homes and gardens for good luck.

How would you like to have him for a lawn ornament?


The second one of Priapus is a fresco in the House of the Vettii in the excavated Roman city of Pompeii, at the foot of Mt. Vesuvious near Naples...

I brought back from Pompeii, a small, 4" tall, statue of Priapus, which I had on the counter in my bathroom. My apartment was burglerized and it was one of items that was taken. It was always a good conversation starter...:biggrin:
 
Last edited:

laser90

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Posts
542
Media
11
Likes
1,460
Points
373
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male

The second one of Priapus is a fresco in the House of the Vettii in the excavated Roman city of Pompeii, at the foot of Mt. Vesuvious near Naples...

I brought back from Pompeii, a small, 4" tall, statue of Priapus, which I had on the counter in my bathroom. My apartment was burglerized and it was one of items that was taken. It was always a good conversation starter...:biggrin:

....... guess it ture a big cock always get the attention....unwanted in this case.

To bad you did not have a small gps attached to the statue to see where he sporting his member now
 

silvertriumph2

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
5,678
Media
22
Likes
7,404
Points
368
Location
Eastcoast USA (NYC-Manhattan)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male

I live in NYc and about 3 weeks after mine was stolen, I found one on ebay (seller was in NYC) just like mine. Of course there
was no way I could prove it was my stolen Priapus statue.

But, I always thought it might have been mine. The starting
bid was $75 and it finally sold for a little over $300. I originally
paid only about $15 for it.
 

LuxInTenebris

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Posts
50
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
153
Location
Kent, England
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Primarily Greeks represented those whom they thought of as barbaric or uncivilised, or even immoral as having large or even super-large genitalia. Frequently centaurs or cyclops or other mythical creatures were depicted in ancient Greek art with large genitals.

Therefore Greeks, civilised and not barbaric were idealised as having more modest endowments.

I think the evidence suggests they thought that the larger the genitals the more libidinous the man, therefore the more likely to be luxurious and unmanly, and the less likely he would be martial, disciplined, highminded and civically responsible, things the Greeks held dear.

Amidst all the various forms of homosexuality the Greeks recognised and or engaged in there was one stereotype which depicted a feminised and luxurious type of predatory homosexual who is often depicted as having large genitals. This character appears on vases and other vessels and is seen as the opposite outcome in type to that which socially accepted and promoted forms of ancient Greek homosexuality were intended to mould Greek men into.

This was the opposite of the archetypal Eros between men which was expected not to be entirely focused on sex and was supposed to encourage male bonding/or more specifically intimacy and love and encourage bravery and martial and physical superiority.

Though I hate to briefly diverge from the topic of stolen novelty statues of Priapus at the value of $15 (hilarious), I can't resist my nerdy urge to throw myself headlong into this and discuss a point Hilaire made about the accepted forms of Greek homosexuality and talk about those Ancient Greeks and their small penises...
Most of the Greek literature that I've read seems to establish a relationship between all but one 'form' of homosexuality, femininity, and barbarousness. I'm using the term 'barbarousness' quite broadly; the Ancient Greek word for 'barbarians' was synonymous with the word 'foreigners', as both are denoted by the noun οἱ βαρβάροι. So, generally speaking, any person whose native language wasn't Ancient Greek was denoted as both 'barbarian' and 'foreign' in the same word. I think that in his Histories, Herodotus actually refers to the Persians as 'the barbarians' more frequently than 'the Persians' or whatever. Within Aeschylus, the adjective 'un-Greek' -ἀνελληνόs - is also used to express 'outlandish' or 'foreign'. Essentially, Greek is the language that gave us 'our' word 'xenophobia': ξένοφοβεα. This is where those damn gays come in:
As far as I can tell, there was only really one acceptable 'form' of homosexuality in Ancient/Classical Greece (documented as we know it via red-figure vases and Greek literature) which adhered to quite strict social conventions: παιδεραστία, 'pederasty'. I'm sure most people who have posted in this thread know about the ἐραστής-ἐρώμενος relationship (active older male+passive young man) it but for such a filthy sport it had some surprisingly exacting criteria! An ἐρώμενος is always depicted as a μειράκιον ἀπώγων - a beardless lad - who could (according to the Liddel, Scott & Jones lexicon) range anywhere from the age of 12 to 20, broadly speaking. The older, active man (ἐραστής) is generally depicted in vase painting as a πώγων (bearded male) but I can't imagine this being an absolute. According to Plato in the 'Protagoras', Socrates was still chasing after his young ἐρώμενος, Alcibiades, when Alcibiades himself had a beard that required to be shaven daily (so quite possibly over 20?). The response to this in 'Protagoras' isn't exactly favourable, so I suppose that coming of age/growing a beard changes the relationship from pederastic to homosexual; the latter being unacceptable but the former being something of a tradition among the Athenian elite. Alcibiades was stunningly rich and later went on to be a subject of some controversy; he was accused of defacing holy statues, but worse still, of homosexual (i.e non-pederastic) relations with the members of his political 'gentlemen's club' (ἑταιρία). As far as I can tell from literature, pederasty was quite common among the highest rungs of Greek society; but obviously finding a source discussing the private life of a 'common' citizen or a slave is like finding a needle in a haystack.
So what I'm now wondering is this: were other forms of homosexuality viewed as unacceptable (as was a relationship between two grown men) by the Greeks on account of being 'foreign' and 'un-Greek'? Pederasty was seemingly an upper-class tradition and respected by the Greek aristocracy, not being devoid of 'Greek' virtues (which the Romans later adopted) that Hilaire identifies: responsibility, martial prowess, discipline, etc. But homosexuality proper? It is said that Alexander the Great (who lived around 100 years later than those dirty pederasts, Socrates and Alcibiades), after his conquest of much of Asia Minor, began to adopt colourful Persian dress and incurred the censure of his sang froid Greek companions for its lack of masculinity. Feminine, non-Greek, barbaric homosexual garb spoiling a (potentially homosexual) king...and femininity in a man was seen as hateful by both the Greeks and the Romans: in his Meditations, Marcus Aurelius labours the point of how odious feminine men, and particularly gays, are to him. Maybe some people still share this view.
One scholar has identified, from observing vase-painting alone, that the act of pederastic sex may actually have entailed a sort of frottage by the ἐραστής between the closed thighs of the ἐρώμενος, and involved no penetration whatsoever. Doubtful... ;)
On a final note - which is actually relevant to the thread title - check out the red-figure vase paintings of the Satyrs. I read somewhere that in Greek New Comedy (Aristophanes?) they wore giant wooden penises as stage props, but rather than being revolting or horrifying as Hilaire suggests (as they no doubt were in other contexts), the enormous penises were simply an object of laughable incredulity for comic effect. Interestingly, the satyrs also represented fertility and growth, just like the god Priapus, who was mentioned earlier. Large penises = good as plant feed, but a little barbaric?

I hope I haven't killed this thread; I think I actually managed to bore myself there...
 

LuxInTenebris

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Posts
50
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
153
Location
Kent, England
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
You bastard maxcox. I saw you replace "pedant" with "sophist" in your post, thereby ruining my apt pun on the first syllable of "pedant" and "pederast". You'll never ruin one of my puns again, I promise you!
By the way...in Plato's view, calling someone a sophist could be very insulting. I hope you speak with no malign intent... ;)
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Ah, but my young friend, I meant it in the earlier and best possible sense.

I have sent you a PM by way of explanation.

Do not fret, as far as puns go it was a weak one at any rate. ;-)






p.s. It's maxcok, not maxcox. One is more than sufficient.
 

petite

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Posts
7,199
Media
2
Likes
146
Points
208
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
Maybe they were being realistic. Most men would have significant shrinkage if they went around nude or just wearing a sheet, even if you were impressively hung. :p