7
798686
Guest
How so?You would be wrong.
Show me, prove to me that you're more than a protest voter.
How so?You would be wrong.
I've already pointed you in the direction of a relevant interview.Show me, prove to me that the BBC exhibited hysteria.
Not worth my time, bad assertion on your part to begin with.How so?
Show me, prove to me that you're more than a protest voter.
Ohh, I see.Not worth my time, bad assertion on your part to begin with.
It hasnt been scrapped at all. They have said they will consult on it. Which is exactly what they said before the election. They plan to consult and then still bring it in. If brexit goes ahead, they will have to because of the recession it is likely to cause.as you well know the so called dementia tax was scrapped
By that, you mean the majority of the nation under 45, because those ARE the corbynistas you are describing? Interestingly also a pretty even mix across all social classes in that age group.Grenfell Tower has become a cause celebre to the likes of you and the Corbynistras,
which you couldn't produce...Ohh, I see.
Well, likewise with your demand for proof of BBC hysteria.
Lmao, oh dude - you're such a let-down.which you couldn't produce...
and you are a fraud.Lmao, oh dude - you're such a let-down.
The wider question is a moral one of whether anyone should have been living in such sub standard housing. And if you visit Kensington, then the standard of housing enjoyed by others is very obviously better indeed.
Weirdly enough, I read the Grenfell flats actually went for 2k per month.By "sub standard" do you mean only so much as the cladding or are you saying the "poor " live in these "slums" while the rich live in the £2000 a month luxury flats in the same block?
Weirdly enough, I read the Grenfell flats actually went for 2k per month.
Whether they were on Housing Benefit, or sublet or rented in full - they weren't exactly cheap.
I don't think anyone knew the extent of their fire unworthiness, and I'm not sure it's a simple case of 'putting the poor in dangerous housing'.
More a case of severe lack of rigour in terms of specifying the upgrades - to the point of negligence it would seem.![]()
This is an intersting spin on the story, but at the very start I recall a news story saying the price of these flats was far below the price of an equivalent flat in the general housing around.Indeed and that's why the hijacking of the tragedy for political gain is so disgusting, these "slums" were actually really nice flats in a really nice area which had just had millions spent to make them even nicer.
It hasnt been scrapped at all. They have said they will consult on it. Which is exactly what they said before the election. They plan to consult and then still bring it in. If brexit goes ahead, they will have to because of the recession it is likely to cause.
By that, you mean the majority of the nation under 45, because those ARE the corbynistas you are describing? Interestingly also a pretty even mix across all social classes in that age group.
The government has now accepted that Kensington council Behaved badly after the fire. The wider question is a moral one of whether anyone should have been living in such sub standard housing. And if you visit Kensington, then the standard of housing enjoyed by others is very obviously better indeed.
Well maybe we havnt even given article 50 notice yet. Seems there is a flaw in the legislation.One of the reason we are leaving the EU is so that we have the power to decide who comes and who goes.
Oh yes.
In so many ways you could well be right, If the Socialist governments hadn't been so lax about border controls in the first place, if the world hadn't listened to the wonderful Angela open borders Merkel (Austria planning to block its borders with Italy - Balkan Sates still with border controls within the EU) hoards arriving daily into Italy.Well maybe we havnt even given article 50 notice yet. Seems there is a flaw in the legislation.
But we already have powers to deport illegal immigrants and leaving the EU makes no difference to that. We also have powers to deport criminals and always have Our jails have many in them we cannot return to their own EU countries
We even have powers to deport people who come her and fail to find work within a reasonable period.
Not if they are from the EU
We have just never chosen to use these powers.
Regardless, the people think government is to blame for the Grenfell fire and it is very difficult to argue it is not.
WTF are you talking about?I suppose on the same score you would attach blame to your leader who will not stamp down on the anti sematic feelings that run through the top echelons of his party, and surely he can be blamed, on your reasoning, for any anti sematic behaviour.
Most people's brains have this function where you can detect the actual word despite any minor spelling mistakes.WTF are you talking about?