grose going commando?

Bbucko

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Posts
7,232
Media
8
Likes
326
Points
208
Location
Sunny SoFla
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Grose? Do you mean gross?

I've been going commando in jeans since I was a teenager and haven't seen anything disgusting about it, though I wear underwear with dress pants or chinos.
 

Nobulcwby69

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Posts
20
Media
49
Likes
21
Points
38
Age
45
Location
Colorado
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Commando all the time in the summer and always in jeans. Gym shorts, sweats yes. Khaki's yes. Dress slacks if I am looking for a quick blo and go.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
I have to agree with Maxcok. Though I think the key word is hygine and I have been (for the amount of time that it took me to LEAVE the premises and NEVER be heard from again) with some guys who wore underwear whose hygine was...um...absent? lol Shorts I find more acceptable for people to freeball in. At least its getting ventilation! :wink::biggrin1:
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
126
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
I have to agree with Maxcok. Though I think the key word is hygine and I have been (for the amount of time that it took me to LEAVE the premises and NEVER be heard from again) with some guys who wore underwear whose hygine was...um...absent? lol Shorts I find more acceptable for people to freeball in. At least its getting ventilation! :wink::biggrin1:
Sorry, the word is 'hygiene', otherwise, I appreciate the nod. Yeah, not everybody can get away with going commando all the time. I was imagining some fat smelly old fart with pee stains on his khakis and dirt tracks in the back. Not a good look. Hot hung dudes in nylon mesh shorts, no problem. However, there's a time and a place too. It's not always appropriate to have your big meat on display in polite company, where you might upset the children and frighten the horses. :biggrin2:
 
Last edited:

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
509
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
Pffft. Underwear is just another chain by which we are fed in to the machine. It's basically just a Victorian neurosis about concealing shame made manifest. One layer isn't enough to hide the world from your disgusting, sinful parts!

And if someone's hygiene is as bad as all that underwear is not going to make any difference.
 

musclebare9

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Posts
978
Media
0
Likes
115
Points
193
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Pffft. Underwear is just another chain by which we are fed in to the machine. It's basically just a Victorian neurosis about concealing shame made manifest. One layer isn't enough to hide the world from your disgusting, sinful parts!

And if someone's hygiene is as bad as all that underwear is not going to make any difference.

Absolutely agree.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
126
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Pffft. Underwear is just another chain by which we are fed in to the machine. It's basically just a Victorian neurosis about concealing shame made manifest. One layer isn't enough to hide the world from your disgusting, sinful parts!
hmmm . . . you could be misinterpreting and extrapolating certain assumptions from my post. I am hardly a prude or Victorian in my attitudes, nor do I think of my or anyone elses 'parts' as disgusting or sinful. Quite the contrary. However, I am what you might call a big time 'shower' in most pants, and though I prefer to hang loose whenever possible, there are certain social situations where it's not just inappropriate, it would be quite crass to be so "in your face". Not to mention I can use the support sometimes, and underwear can be fun.

And if someone's hygiene is as bad as all that underwear is not going to make any difference.
Yes, well just as I don't care to see a whole world of unattractive people running around naked, I can take a pass on certain people freeballing and freeassing. For some people having that extra layer of absorbent cotton definitely makes a difference, and I appreciate that.

Absolutely agree.
:confused: This from a fella whose very extensive gallery is chock full of jockstrap and underwear shots?
 
Last edited:

rrambo

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
124
Media
99
Likes
43
Points
173
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
haven't worn underwear in 20 years.. my gf in HS suggested I go commando.. after a day or 2 getting use to it I've been freelballing ever since...
 

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
509
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
hmmm . . . you could be misinterpreting and extrapolating certain assumptions from my post...

I was speaking generally, not directly to you or your points. That we disagree does not bother me in the least.

Perhaps to clarify, I stand by my assertion that underwear, as with undershirts, and socks with sandals, are merely vestiges of prudish colonial attitudes. They do, however, serve a function under certain conditions, and have often been molded by fashion in to attractive form.

Underwear makes sense in cold conditions, or when wearing a pad or for medical reasons (like an adult diaper or colostomy bag). Otherwise I consider it redundant.

Undershirts are great in cold weather, or when being worn, exposed, by men or women with fantastic physiques. They are humorous when worn by people who are wildly out-of-shape. Otherwise, what's the point.

Socks serve a utilitarian purpose when worn under shoes or boots. In sandals or open-toed anything they look out of place.

Basically, wearing clothes under your clothes doesn't make much sense to me unless it's cold out or you're accessorizing. It's like wearing clothing while swimming. What's the point unless it's cold out?
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Sorry, the word is 'hygiene', otherwise, I appreciate the nod. Yeah, not everybody can get away with going commando all the time. I was imagining some fat smelly old fart with pee stains on his khakis and dirt tracks in the back. Not a good look. Hot hung dudes in nylon mesh shorts, no problem. However, there's a time and a place too. It's not always appropriate to have your big meat on display in polite company, where you might upset the children and frighten the horses. :biggrin2:

And this is why we proof read lol:biggrin1: I agree. Shorts are just yummy and yes one does have to take into the consideration where one is freeballing. As you say in a later post, with some people that extra layer of absorbent cotton does make a difference. And the support can be helpful at times (think of testicular injuries. Sometimes you really don't want your boys moving and slapping around:eek2:)
 

whoknowes

Loved Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Posts
310
Media
10
Likes
731
Points
448
Age
59
Location
McCalla (Alabama, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Im not really sure why you would find it grose/gross... your privates touch the inside of under wear boxers/briefs so whats the diffrence.... if your clean then your clean....
I never have understood why people think its nasty/gross for the CLEAN body to touch clean clothes.... I guess its just some sort of metal hang up some people have..... Kinda think its better to have a little air flow around the boys....