Gun control

phonehome

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Posts
3,896
Media
0
Likes
4,276
Points
343
Gender
Male


Well first off in the post I responded to it was fairly obvious the time frame in question, he said "since the end of march"

In was those incidents, in those few weeks from Atlanta to Austin which I was commenting about and it is an absolute FACT that in not a single one of those was there one of your "good guys with a gun" present so he could ride in and save the day.

Your "proof" you really are as per usual when your ilk tries to make this case grasping at every available straw

THREE times two of which were well over a year ago and the other going on FIVE years ago.

For every example your kind can trot out I can cite 10 or maybe 100 where ithere was no GGWG

Wal-Nart in Oklahoma, how about the Wal-Mart in Texas just last year ?

A Church in Texas, How about the other church in Texas, that church in Charelston , that church (synagogue) in PA and the one in CA ?

One mall in MN, FIVE YEARS AGO where BTW the assailant just had knife and probably could have been dis-armed by anyone who was un-armed and just knew how to do it. How about all the other malls in the last 5 years where shooters were just exactly that SHOOTERS ?

To show how flimsy your case is 2 out of 3 of your examples are questionable to say the least

In Oklahoma the shooter KILLED HIMSELF, now I sure you will try and claim "well he saw that GGWG and THEN killed himself and otherwise would NOT have" Well maybe maybe not we have seen numerous times where the shooter in one of these mass shooting events, after shooting and killing how ever many people kills himself often before anyone with a gun. law enforcement or otherwise ever shows up much less confronts him, the FEDEX shooter being a recent example and in the case of your Oklahoma example, you and how ever wrote that article was NOT THERE and you/they were certainly not looking through his eyes so you/they have/had NO IDEA if that person EVEN SAW your GGWG. before killing himself ,

In the case of the mall in MN, that was not your average run of the mill GGWG, but as is OFTEN THE CASE in examples your kind will cite a LEO, off duty but a LEO just the same.

Last but not least for YEARS now we have had to listen to "you" go on and on about how all you GGWG's had to go through all this extensive screening, and were highly training and proficient and could shoot the eye out of a fly at 50 yards 10 out of 10 times , well the latest trend/craze in so far just "red states" is to say "to hell with all of that" IA, TN, from what I hear TX soon , you no longer need any kind pf "permit" which means you certainly do not need to complete any kind of training or display any level of proficiency, just have the ability to posses a weapon, most of the laws in question contain verbage that states that the person in question can not even be questioned or challenged , obviously they can not be asked to show their "gun permit" because now no such permit is required and soon enough will not even exist anymore so soon for all you or anyone knows that person packing that pair of 9's is a convicted felon who can not even legally posses them but YOU will NEVER KNOW and CAN NOT ASK .

Your first hint that anything is amiss will be when he STARTS SHOOTING AT YOU !!

You better hope he does not get the drop on you and shoot you in the back
 

Utfbo5122

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Posts
116
Media
35
Likes
583
Points
313
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Well first off in the post I responded to it was fairly obvious the time frame in question, he said "since the end of march"

In was those incidents, in those few weeks from Atlanta to Austin which I was commenting about and it is an absolute FACT that in not a single one of those was there one of your "good guys with a gun" present so he could ride in and save the day.

Your "proof" you really are as per usual when your ilk tries to make this case grasping at every available straw

THREE times two of which were well over a year ago and the other going on FIVE years ago.

For every example your kind can trot out I can cite 10 or maybe 100 where ithere was no GGWG

Wal-Nart in Oklahoma, how about the Wal-Mart in Texas just last year ?

A Church in Texas, How about the other church in Texas, that church in Charelston , that church (synagogue) in PA and the one in CA ?

One mall in MN, FIVE YEARS AGO where BTW the assailant just had knife and probably could have been dis-armed by anyone who was un-armed and just knew how to do it. How about all the other malls in the last 5 years where shooters were just exactly that SHOOTERS ?

To show how flimsy your case is 2 out of 3 of your examples are questionable to say the least

In Oklahoma the shooter KILLED HIMSELF, now I sure you will try and claim "well he saw that GGWG and THEN killed himself and otherwise would NOT have" Well maybe maybe not we have seen numerous times where the shooter in one of these mass shooting events, after shooting and killing how ever many people kills himself often before anyone with a gun. law enforcement or otherwise ever shows up much less confronts him, the FEDEX shooter being a recent example and in the case of your Oklahoma example, you and how ever wrote that article was NOT THERE and you/they were certainly not looking through his eyes so you/they have/had NO IDEA if that person EVEN SAW your GGWG. before killing himself ,

In the case of the mall in MN, that was not your average run of the mill GGWG, but as is OFTEN THE CASE in examples your kind will cite a LEO, off duty but a LEO just the same.

Last but not least for YEARS now we have had to listen to "you" go on and on about how all you GGWG's had to go through all this extensive screening, and were highly training and proficient and could shoot the eye out of a fly at 50 yards 10 out of 10 times , well the latest trend/craze in so far just "red states" is to say "to hell with all of that" IA, TN, from what I hear TX soon , you no longer need any kind pf "permit" which means you certainly do not need to complete any kind of training or display any level of proficiency, just have the ability to posses a weapon, most of the laws in question contain verbage that states that the person in question can not even be questioned or challenged , obviously they can not be asked to show their "gun permit" because now no such permit is required and soon enough will not even exist anymore so soon for all you or anyone knows that person packing that pair of 9's is a convicted felon who can not even legally posses them but YOU will NEVER KNOW and CAN NOT ASK .

Your first hint that anything is amiss will be when he STARTS SHOOTING AT YOU !!

You better hope he does not get the drop on you and shoot you in the back

Because again, most of these shootings take place in areas where you're not allowed to carry guns.

The "someone could have disarmed the guy with the knife if someone knew what they were doing" is another kicker. Because doing the hundreds of hours it takes to get to that level of proficiency, combined with the fact that even if you did have that level of proficiency, youd still just severely hacked to bits. I've never seen a "knife fight" take place outside of a studio where the attacker us using huge Haymaker type motions and they're going in "slow mo".

Ggwag, doesn't mean anything if people have the ability to carry, but don't carry. Even then, since ggwag are apparently not doing anything, one way or the other, what's the issue? Because even when you do see someone carrying, people like you complain and raise hell over it. Even the police are demonized by people like you.

And youre right. You won't know until someone starts shooting. And if the person is behind me, and im the first one hit, why does it matter if I have a gun or not? I'd take my chances in having one in the chance I get caught in one of those extremely rare instances.
 

gr8gatsby

Mythical Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Posts
6,596
Media
5
Likes
30,214
Points
233
Location
Sarasota (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
They want gun control but then the people who can have guns are the police who they are also afraid of. Weird times man.
Only people that 'they' want to have guns should have guns*

"They" can try to take em, not gonna happen though
Who are "they," the radical white terrorists? Radicalized Christian Terrorists? Militarized angry white supremacists?
 

ASexMrHung1

Loved Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Posts
319
Media
0
Likes
588
Points
313
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Who are "they," the radical white terrorists? Radicalized Christian Terrorists? Militarized angry white supremacists?

Every American is entitled to own firearms unless felons so not sure why you are making this about race.


Shall not be infringed, :emoji_sunglasses::emoji_thumbsup:
 

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,243
Media
213
Likes
31,789
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Every American is entitled to own firearms unless felons so not sure why you are making this about race.


Shall not be infringed, :emoji_sunglasses::emoji_thumbsup:
Actually, according to the constitution, there is no provision to lawfully keep firearms from felons.
 

gr8gatsby

Mythical Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Posts
6,596
Media
5
Likes
30,214
Points
233
Location
Sarasota (Florida, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Clearly you do, you want them confiscated sooo badly you can't stand seeing someone exercise their freedom as a human being.
Thank you for speaking for me and completely misrepresenting my point of view. If I need a deplorable as a PR person I'll hit you up.