It doesn't bother me either way. Aesthetically, I find cut cocks fascinating to look at and, practically, an uncut one more enjoyable. The only thing that I don't much like is (a) a tight circumcision and (b) a tight foreskin.
As a Brit, almost every one of my friends from childhood were also uncut (as I am). As a kid, though, my childhood playmate across the road (a few weeks younger than me) was one of the very rare circumcised kids - I don't know why he was circumcised, we never discussed it - and we started comparing our dicks, having peeing competitions etc. at a very early age. It was only when we went to secondary school that I met and befriended a couple of other lads who were cut. One of them gained a lot of attention in the showers following sports/PE as his limp, cut cock was the size of a Red Bull can!
As an adult, I know that three of my close circle of friends have a circumcised cock: one (as with his three older brothers) was cut at birth, unusual in the UK - no religious or cultural connections in his case; another is an Australian lad (mid-30s) born in Sydney when RIC was the norm and the third was circumcised as a young teenager.
Consequently, I don't find it 'odd' if I discover, either through discussion or casual observation, that a guy in the UK has been circumcised. Given the large number of African, American, Australian and Jewish/Muslim guys that are settled or born in the UK and who I've encountered through working in a cosmopolitan environment I just regard a cut cock in the same terms as different hair colour/styles, tattoos etc. that some guys have, some guys don't.