Or dicks, for that matter.
Given that anyone who has access to a PC and the Internet to view and contribute to LSPG, surely has access to a digital camera of some description, does anyone give any credence at all to the size claims of posters who have no prick-pics in their gallery.
Faces or other distinguishing marks (tattoos etc) are understandable but, unless you live on a naturist resort and have one heck of an easily identifiable cock, why don't you put your member where your mouth is and identify yourself as genuine?
It's so depressingly tiresome when someone posts a question of size to see a Galleryless dick replying "Yeah, man. I'm like 23" x 14" and still jelquing cuz I wananuva inch".
Boring. Boring. Boring.
It also smacks of being some deluded individual's sad fantasy which is why this has been posted in the "Fiction" topic forum.
Given that anyone who has access to a PC and the Internet to view and contribute to LSPG, surely has access to a digital camera of some description, does anyone give any credence at all to the size claims of posters who have no prick-pics in their gallery.
Faces or other distinguishing marks (tattoos etc) are understandable but, unless you live on a naturist resort and have one heck of an easily identifiable cock, why don't you put your member where your mouth is and identify yourself as genuine?
It's so depressingly tiresome when someone posts a question of size to see a Galleryless dick replying "Yeah, man. I'm like 23" x 14" and still jelquing cuz I wananuva inch".
Boring. Boring. Boring.
It also smacks of being some deluded individual's sad fantasy which is why this has been posted in the "Fiction" topic forum.