Um, no. You don't have "facts" you have an opinion, one with which I have disagreed. I posed a lengthy disagreement to which you replied "nuh uh" and then said you haven't received a disagreement. It's right there, sonny.
I guess you missed the Figures i put in my first post in this thread. Again, i never said Nuh uh. I said UH HUH, like you did. I was repeating what you said. Dont call me sonny. I dont call you pops, so dont refer to me in such a patronising tone.
You're being "attacked" because you aren't defending your position. I explained that you can't just "cancel" debts. It doesn't work that way. Especially when you can't say which "debt" should be cancelled or explain yourself out of the future fallout of not paying back their debts. For instance, if you think Word Bank loans shouldn't be paid back then you'd have to explain why the next third world country down the line doesn't deserve the loan that would comprise the money Haiti owes. It would be a domino effect. One country doesn't pay, another doesn't get development dollars, repeat.
Let's start simply: Which debt, precisely, should be cancelled?
It is my opinion that ALL debts, by all banks should be cancelled. Development money does very little to help countries. The corrupt Governments in those nations dont help, but almost all money made from such developments is spent on paying back the loan. If you want to help the third world, cut the debts. Why cant developed nations just offer services to help these nations. Afterall, it was us that fucked the nations over with our empires, and our interferring ways. Call me naive, but its the fair thing to do. Even medieval Kings would help kings of failed wars after beating them, as is the relationship between rulers. We invaded, took what we wanted, and told them to fuck themselves.
And conservatives are the intolerant ones?
Yes, Your status is you being called a conservative. Calling you right wing is apt. Its not intolerance.
done and done.