Have people made comments to you about not being circumcised?

[not_brand_x]

The majority of comments I have received are more curiosity based ("how do you still have yours?"). I had one girl refuse to do anything with me because she thought the foreskin meant I was unclean (an opinion based in ignorance and acquired from older generations). The best comments have been from partners unfamiliar with foreskin who are interested in learning what makes it tick.

 

[Uncutpete]

The percentage of comments in my life is 2% negative (mainly before high school or on line) and 98% positive or curious and then positive. Women love to play with it, love how it feels inside them, usually know that it makes my cock look like the great classical nude statues (but bigger). It may have to do with the fact that I am strong and tall and my cock is big, but there was very little teasing, and it ended when girls came into the picture. I have been proud of my foreskin, and happy to show interested people how it works.

 

[Sauerkraut]

Had a guy at the gym who was VERY interested in the subject, and was VERY sure that I should get it removed for health reasons. I did not agree.

The "health reasons" are all untrue. Urinary tract infection rate for cut men is 1.27% and for uncut men is 1.28%, any statistician will tell you that is well within any margin of error and the numbers could easily be reversed. [If these people were really concerned about urinary tract infection they would be looking at women, who's urinary tract infection rate is 9.23%, but they don't propose labiaectomies, aka female circumcisions, better known as female genital mutilation, which is a crime.]

The original African HIV "study" linking men being uncut to infection rate has been proven to be untrue. Once research without an agenda was done the study and socioeconomic factors were taken into account they discovered that affluence, education level, access to medical facilities and basic infrastructure (i.e. running water, electricity, transportation, etc.) were more directly linked to HIV infection rates. It turned out that who got cut was linked most to affluence and aspirations for wealth and a left affect of British colonialism; the wealthy and those who aspire to be wealthy there are anglophiles and maintain many outdated misinformed and misguided old British customs. The original study was done by individuals who are hangers on of a British Eugenicists groups who think/thought that mass circumcision will cause future generations of men to be born without foreskins. The founders of the group thought that circumcision was the cure for masturbation and this was necessary because what the 18th century British "scientist" thought was that there was a TINY MAN INSIDE each sperm cell because the sperm cells move and that meant life and they thought that masturbation was mass-murder.

As for the hygiene argument, in most of the world, running water is now indoors and even comes heated; soap has been around for centuries.

 

[Sauerkraut]

First off, I have quite a lot of foreskin, all covered when soft and mostly covered when hard, less covered if extremely hard and curved back against my abs.

At the start of swimming season, freshman year of high school, three girls walked into the boys locker room (supposedly on accident) and saw me showering, luckily the water was hot. Word got around about my size, which got me a lot of action and a reputation, nothing ever got back to me about my being uncut. The reputation followed me to college, starting with one sorority that three girls from my high school ended up in. There were more out guys at college too.

In high school two, girls refused to do anything with my cock because I was uncut; I convinced them to give me a hand job. After playing with it for a couple minutes one gave me head (it didn't fit in her throat) and she ended up going for a ride. None of the other girls said anything about it but I had to teach a couple of them how to treat it, they were pushing the skin to base and pretending it wasn't there, a few pushed it back so hard it hurt. Neither of the guys I was with senior year had any issues with me being uncut.

In college, almost all the girls and all of the guys knew how to treat foreskin. No one had any issues with my being uncut, some of partners, who I knew to be Jewish seemed more fascinated by my foreskin then other partners. Regardless of religion, they seemed to by more into my size any way.

It wasn't until sophomore year, of college, that I realized that the hand-over-hand action that some of my partners had done wasn't part of giving a hand job but a measuring trick. (Wish I had figured that out in high school.) BTW with most females, my head is in their fourth hand-over-hand, males is third or fourth depending on the guy.

 

[little10ca]

The "health reasons" are all untrue. Urinary tract infection rate for cut men is 1.27% and for uncut men is 1.28%, any statistician will tell you that is well within any margin of error and the numbers could easily be reversed. [If these people were really concerned about urinary tract infection they would be looking at women, who's urinary tract infection rate is 9.23%, but they don't propose labiaectomies, aka female circumcisions, better known as female genital mutilation, which is a crime.]

The original African HIV "study" linking men being uncut to infection rate has been proven to be untrue. Once research without an agenda was done the study and socioeconomic factors were taken into account they discovered that affluence, education level, access to medical facilities and basic infrastructure (i.e. running water, electricity, transportation, etc.) were more directly linked to HIV infection rates. It turned out that who got cut was linked most to affluence and aspirations for wealth and a left affect of British colonialism; the wealthy and those who aspire to be wealthy there are anglophiles and maintain many outdated misinformed and misguided old British customs. The original study was done by individuals who are hangers on of a British Eugenicists groups who think/thought that mass circumcision will cause future generations of men to be born without foreskins. The founders of the group thought that circumcision was the cure for masturbation and this was necessary because what the 18th century British "scientist" thought was that there was a TINY MAN INSIDE each sperm cell because the sperm cells move and that meant life and they thought that masturbation was mass-murder.

As for the hygiene argument, in most of the world, running water is now indoors and even comes heated; soap has been around for centuries.

I didn't know all of that, but I was pretty sure the health stuff was bogus. He mostly harped on penile cancer rates, I just thought he was a nut. I've had nothing but good experiences with being uncut, I love my foreskin, girls like it, so I'm not going to let anyone badger me into getting rid of it!

 

[williamsw]

being uncut myself yes i did get a lot of ridicule about have a foreskin most of the guys in high school gym class where cut . and yes i also had several girls what did not like seeing a foreskin

 

[NIMBUS]

This old chestnut has, indirectly, made a reappearance in the British press this weekend:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-transplant-recipient-to-become-a-father.html

 

[apple20]

Nobody has ever commented on my intact status or made fun of me. They tend to forget or not realize my status when commenting and reticule others for being intact.

 

[BoHungandUncut]

Yes, a couple of times. Always been positive. "Wish I had mine but they cut it off"

 

[deleted569656]

I've been with a number of girls that were curious or hadn't seen an uncut cock before, but only a few people have wanted to follow up or have an actual discussion.

Had a guy at the gym who was VERY interested in the subject, and was VERY sure that I should get it removed for health reasons. I did not agree.

He was clearly a stupid cunt lol

 

[Mcuthigh]

I didn't know all of that, but I was pretty sure the health stuff was bogus. He mostly harped on penile cancer rates, I just thought he was a nut. I've had nothing but good experiences with being uncut, I love my foreskin, girls like it, so I'm not going to let anyone badger me into getting rid of it!

Well…you spew the foreskin propaganda adequately. However, most Dudes are smart enough not to copy the material word for word.

 

[tgirlsrgreat]

never, in fact I've never received anything but adoration for my big mushroomed glorious cock

 

[masonjames]

I've had two doctors ask me if I wanted to get circumcised. When I told them i already was and that it was restored they both looked embarrassed
Don't understand doctors obsession with circumcision given that I didn't mention it or any problems with my dick. Both of them pulled the skin back so they could see there were no issues

 

[curtdude]

yyes growing up in so California everyone was circumcised I was the odd one I got circumcised at 19 to fit in with my buddies

 

[deleted14860851]

I'm not from the U.S. so it would probably never be something I would ever be asked, and never have been.

 

[Jfcan]

No never had negative comments. I’ve had guys want it more when they have seen I’m uncut so its always been a very positive response.

 

[williamsw]

YES , when i was high school in gym class when changing i was made fun of because i was the only one who cock was not circumscribed, when i need my physical forms filled out to play high school sports , it was noted that i was not circumscribed in forms .

 

[Iwanthead]

Yes but everyone one of them enjoyed running their tongue under my foreskin, said they like the feeling on their tongue and how it produces more precum for them. All positive comments.