Kotchanski
Expert Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Posts
- 2,850
- Media
- 10
- Likes
- 105
- Points
- 193
- Location
- England (United Kingdom)
- Sexuality
- Unsure
- Gender
- Female
I see there are lots of unforseen situations you can not prepare for.
I mean I have been to some poor countries in latin america and all the food those people got was the food they themselves grew with the only store at 200 miles away or something if they even had the money.
I wouldn't call them poor because they made the best with they can do.
But in the western world I can not understand this concept of being too poor to have something to eat.
We have lots of kind people in our environment who are willing to share and even the homeless are getting decent meals every day, so why can't people who own a home, cellphone, 50" tv, pc, 10 different pair of shoes, fancy jewelry, get something to eat?
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the problem just pride and luxury in most cases?
I apologize if I'm disrespecting anyone, the example I'm using are of people in my direct environment.
Your description of people in your direct environment unfortunately didn't apply to us back then. We had no method of growing our own food (it was a flat, no sills for even a flower pot!) those around us were some of the most disturbed and disturbing people we've ever encountered who are more in keeping with one of your previous descriptions of those who place drugs and alcohol above everything else.
I'd agree that in a lot of cases it comes down to pride and luxury, but not all cases. The systems are set up to help people who tick certain boxes, and those who fail to tick them are assumed to be doing well enough to not require help from others, which is often far from being the case.