Have you ever had sex with someone outside your socioeconomic class?

[canon]

It's amazing how much being naked eliminates the so called social differences that some people over value.

Frankly I dont think anyone is better especially because of money.

 

[bigboy9239]

I have always been working class, but the funny thing is, most of the girls I dated when I was in high school were of the same class, but all went to college and became "Middle Class"....does that count? I am still in contact with several of them...and a couple want sex with me to this day. As for conversations, I have always read a lot and been into technical hobbies (ham radio, astronomy), so the conversations could get intense.....but I like that.

 

[yhtang]

Usually, when I meet them, they are naked and willing, so we have sex. When naked, I have no idea of their socio-economic class.

 

[DannonCannon]

This one made me laugh, since someone was recently quizzing me very intensely on money matters/ professional "aspirations," etc. I think they were trying to figure out if I was remotely "dateable." Haa.

Even called me a "loser" (based on my not-so-great job [their opinion]) ... I think this way to make me angry and provoke me to share more (possibly stuff that would reveal I wasn't _such_ a total loser after all). I tried not to get too definite, which they no doubt found frustrating.

I have no sexual diseases, am not an alcoholic, and don't do drugs -- those 3 things really all do count as "assets" in my book. But of course I didn't mention those things.

Not that I'm against drinking ... but many people do FAR too much of it, calling it "light social drinking," when it's really something else.

 

[924628]

This one made me laugh, since someone was recently quizzing me very intensely on money matters/ professional "aspirations," etc. I think they were trying to figure out if I was remotely "dateable." Haa.

Even called me a "loser" (based on my not-so-great job [their opinion]) ... I think this way to make me angry and provoke me to share more (possibly stuff that would reveal I wasn't _such_ a total loser after all). I tried not to get too definite, which they no doubt found frustrating.

I have no sexual diseases, am not an alcoholic, and don't do drugs -- those 3 things really all do count as "assets" in my book. But of course I didn't mention those things.

Not that I'm against drinking ... but many people do FAR too much of it, calling it "light social drinking," when it's really something else.

No matter how you want to dress it up to make it look like anything other than drug taking, alcohol is a drug. If you drink alcohol, you do drugs. I find it infuriating and childish how society insists on even making the distinction. It makes one appear to be seemingly innocuous while the other is the devils work. Really it couldn't be any more backward.

 

[CarpeD1em]

when i was in college i worked a footlocker . There was this chick who came in she was 22 and she would bring her kid brother in to buy shoes. I ran into her at a party and she actually went to the same school as me UNLV in vegas. We hung out for a while and fucked a few times. Without going into to much detail she was the granddaughter of a casino owner. She drove a brandnew BMW had a boss ass condo and shopped like hell all on her grandfathers penny

as far as the sex it wasnt anything different

 

[DannonCannon]

No matter how you want to dress it up to make it look like anything other than drug taking, alcohol is a drug. If you drink alcohol, you do drugs. I find it infuriating and childish how society insists on even making the distinction. It makes one appear to be seemingly innocuous while the other is the devils work. Really it couldn't be any more backward.

Alcohol is a socially acceptable thing. You can go out with friends, have a few drinks, be sociable, not get too messed up, and nobody thinks anything. Then of course you may go home and start pounding waay more in private. No one's the wiser.

I'm always suspicious of people who take selfies with drink in hand. The drink is something special, always arranged just so in the pic, often photographed through a hazy filter. More than two such pictures on any individual account makes me a little suspicious.

 

[Unnamed]

No relationships.

 

[deleted136887]

Huh.
This like fucking an untouchable in India?
sounds kinda strange in this day and age in a "classless society"

 

[Unnamed]

If you think we live without classifications after four pages who are aware of it... Man idk what to tell you

 

[deleted136887]

there was heavy dose of sarcasm in my post...
Of course I know that class is all pervasive.
It just sounds rather strange and outdated though.
Like the lord of the manor fucking the cook.
Like Lady Chatterly's lover...

 

[wappingite]

Sex is the great social liberator and allows intimate contact across boundaries that may not occur otherwise. I've had sex across the socio-economic continuum including visiting very opulent homes as well as very modest ones. I'm not going to be so naive or idealistic to pretend class doesn't exist because it does. It's not a value judgement, but it does impact people's personalities and behaviours. Class also doesn't necessarily equate to income anyway as people's fortunes wax and wane.

It can be fun though, at least from an occupational fantasy point of view. I used to hook up after work with a mate who is a builder. He'd show up in his worker clothes, hat and boots, and I'd be wearing a suit. We'd keep most our clothes on during sex as it turned us both on. Afterwards, we'd go for a drink and chat.

 

[herpeskitty]

No relationships.

That's interesting. Elaborate.

 

[927690]

Being from a small blue-collar town, almost everyone is a rung up on the "ladder" for me. But I must admit, I do enjoy the rich, angry daddy's girls who loves to let herself go with a self-loathing blue collar country boy.

 

[Popyuu]

Yeah, didn't last though.

 

[shojishoji]

I don't think i've ever had sex with someone IN my socioeconomic class...

just kidding - what a daft question?

 

[herpeskitty]

Being from a small blue-collar town, almost everyone is a rung up on the "ladder" for me. But I must admit, I do enjoy the rich, angry daddy's girls who loves to let herself go with a self-loathing blue collar country boy.

That post makes me

 

[pcghabsy]

I had never even thought of such a question. But come to think of it, the answer is yes. However, I don't relate to the rest of the questions.

 

[HorsemanUK]

All potential partners are required to submit their bank & mortgage statements, investment portfolio, three current credit rating reports and income tax returns from the last ten years...

Socioeconomic class? Really?

I agree, I don't feel socioeconomics factor in what person you find you have a connection with. Yes I have had short term relationships that was purely sexual and was not going to go anywhere long term, however, the women I have viewed as long term potential were more about the person they were and the way we connected as people rather than what their social and economic background was.

I think people who choose parters based on this criteria solely for a long term partner are purposely gold-digging and will probably find issues in the relationship further down the line.

Having said that the question was have you had sex with someone outside of your own background and basically yes I have.

 

[MikeNL]

In the past I did have the tendency to date women from lower social economic classes and more precisely women who were having many problems including financial problems. I struggled with this a lot because I knew I was doing this for all the wrong reasons.