Now in this one I want to know your views on having dear old dad circumcised. Why would you have it done or not have it done?
If my dad were still among the living, I would leave him as he was.
(and let's try to keep this civilized)
SirConcis, it appears that you're saying medical indications are the only reasons circumcision should be done. I think the O/P was alluding to other reasons, right?
I meant medical reasons. If there were some sort of medical concerns regarding the foreskin and the overall health, well-being of your father.
To those who have said that if his health were that dire then he would be a goner anyway, keep in mind, there are health issues which are not end of life; but, can render a patient unable to make decisions. A stroke victim for example. He may not be able to communicate or perform various tasks; but may be alive for many years to come, some live in a rather vegetative state, others in a partial state of ability to communicate, still others make nearly a full recovery. Men such as these, and men in temporary comas (such as from an accident or a diabetic coma or medically induced) may need somebody to make these decisions.
As I ask at the start, why would you have it done or not done. If it meant certain additional health concerns might take place, would you say no? If the doctor indicated there was a 'slight' risk of health problems, how would you proceed?