Health Care 2011

[Speculator]

And where has that worked out?

Pretty much any place it's ever been implemented. Between 1945-90 you didn't have people clambering the Berlin wall to escape into the East, it was always the other way around for some peculiar reason. Perhaps you know something about Communism that the people living under it for 45 years didn't?

 

[B_Marius567]

You've got to be kidding if you're looking for sympathy that you pay n60 dollars a month for health insurance. I have to BUY my health insurance and pay 820 dollars a month plus a 25 dollar copay for doctor's visits, 500 dollar copay for an ER visit and 1000 dollar copay for and in patient hospital stay. PLUS I pay 160 dollars a month in copays for prescription meds that I take.

You must be well off
I will be poor if I had to pay that much.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Within a system of all encompassing government monopoly if for one reason or another you don't get the treatment/resources you need yes it happens!) you're totally screwed, there was one option available and it's been shut in your face. A free market removes this unnecessary restriction and allows a plurality to thrive, if one provider doesn't want to treat you for any reason they'll be a number of others ready and willing to take his place.

A "free market" doesn't remove that restriction.
In a financial system that is completely "free market" or "government regulated", there will always be options for people to receive the goods and services they want on a consumer level. The only real differences focus around how rules and standards are established within certain industries and where the money goes.

These are basic concepts, I don't understand why you have such a hard time grasping them.

You are in no position or of any high level, pedagogical stature to question my ability to comprehend your overly simplified ideals. And it would be in your best interest to refrain from doing that from here on. Do I make myself perfectly clear here?

btw, this isn't about the public sector vs the private sector; it's about the removal of coercive monopolies. In some situations I believe that public ownership may be the least worst option, but that doesn't apply to healthcare which is an industry ideal for free market competition.

Public sector vs. Private Sector. Removing "coercive monopolies". It's all politically distorted double talk for the same thing... whether or not the government should intervene and provide affordable options for its citizens, or should they stay out of it and let citizens sink or swim in the name of "freedom".

Here's the bottom line... we need more affordable options for healthcare in this country. The current system in place for healthcare is already overly coercive as it stands. 50 Million people do not have health insurance in the United States with the majority of them not being able to afford it. If none of the current companies running things are providing an option for these people, the government should be allowed to do so. If you're such a staunch defender of the "free market", you'd put aside the "left vs. right" bullshit and understand what that really means.

Blinded ideological arguments about "free market" are nothing more than the cries of the greedy who want the "freedom" to make money at all costs regardless of whomever gets hurt or harmed in the process. It's obvious why the current heavy hitters in the healthcare industry wouldn't want a government to intervene and create a nationwide health plan option because they know it would be harder for them to make larger profits even though they make excessive ones right now. Government already determines the mass majority of people's actions through standard law and maintaining an individual's Constitutional rights (including yours), so this has nothing to do with your false implications of laziness even while you ignorantly taunt others about "wanting government to decide things for them".

At the end of the day the insurance companies just don't want the competition, and because they know money drives certain people more than civil equality they can get people like you regurgitating the rhetoric of "government oppression" at the drop of a dime (pun very much intended). By all means, you're free to believe all that madness if you choose. But it's ignorant of you to expect the government to protect your civil liberties while allowing you to feverishly make profit at the expense of others. Because eventually, the two do intertwine and your need to make your pockets fatter doesn't trump a person's right to live.

 

[Speculator]

A "free market" doesn't remove that restriction.
In a financial system that is completely "free market" or "government regulated", there will always be options for people to receive the goods and services they want on a consumer level. The only real differences focus around how rules and standards are established within certain industries and where the money goes.

I don't know what you're talking about, this doesn't address the point I made. Once again your brain is working overtime but your eyes are on strike.

Government regulation and involvment restricts the market and produces a bland, expensive, uniform product. As a musician don't you believe we should be able to experiment a bit and take risks so that society might be able to advance?

Conformity has it's place, but you have to mix it up a bit once in a while; the dead hand of the state prevents this however and as a result civilisation stagnates. A wholly unattractive proposition.

Public sector vs. Private Sector. Removing "coercive monopolies". It's all politically distorted double talk for the same thing... whether or not the government should intervene and provide affordable options for its citizens, or should they stay out of it and let citizens sink or swim in the name of "freedom".

lol at the state providing "affordable options" for it's citizens, it's become so expensive that there aren't enough zero's on your national debt clock to keep a track on their extravagance, and still the populous goes without the resources it desperately needs.

You need a wake up call my boy

 

[B_VinylBoy]

I don't know what you're talking about

That's more telling than you even realize.

Government regulation and involvment restricts the market and produces a bland, expensive, uniform product.

You hate government. Blah, blah, blah. I get it. However, don't expect these overgeneralizing statements to hold any weight here. While government is not perfect by any means, they do provide adequate services for those that do choose to use them.

As a musician don't you believe we should be able to experiment a bit and take risks so that society might be able to advance?

Risks within reason, of course. One doesn't have to impede on the civil liberties of others in order to create something that may help a society advance forward.

lol at the state providing "affordable options" for it's citizens, it's become so expensive that there aren't enough zero's on your national debt clock to keep a track on their extravegance, and still the populous goes without the resources it desperately needs.

You'll have to be specific here. How does this relate to Health Care in our country again?

You need a wake up call my boy

Watch your damn words around me, asshole. I'm not "your boy" and I never will be.

 

[Speculator]

You hate government. Blah, blah, blah. I get it. However, don't expect these overgeneralizing statements to hold any weight here. While government is not perfect by any means, they do provide adequate services for those that do choose to use them.

I don't "hate" the concept of government, it's a good idea in principle as long as the government works for the population, not the other way around.

The difference between you and me is that I believe gov't is a means to an end, the end being a society that is quite nice to live in. You believe that centralisation is an end in itself which leaves the the population with zero protection and a state that can get away with anything.

You'll have to be specific here. How does this relate to Health Care in our country again?

Your country cannot afford a national health service at this time arsehole, that's how it relates to the health care industry.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

The difference between you and me is that I believe gov't is a means to an end, the end being a society that is quite nice to live in. You believe that centralisation is an end in itself which leaves the the population with zero protection and a state that can get away with anything.

One can only wonder how much of this rhetorical fluff remains in your system so you can willing pull it out of your sorry ass.

Your country cannot afford a national health service at this time arsehole, that's how it relates to the health care industry.

With a proper budget which implements the right financial incentives with already established entities in the business, as well as proper budget cuts in other services that are over funded (such as Defense), it could over time be initialized, paid for and even generate a reasonable & steady profit. You know, if we're going start talking "the real" about this issue. Sadly, the only thing you're about on this thread is rhetorical tripe and pure ideological bullshit, so I won't hold you or anything you say with any substantial relevance. You make real fiscal conservatives look bad. You may want to try shutting up once in a while and letting real intellectuals speak.

And please... don't censor your slander for my sake. I'm sure there's a lot more you'd rather call "your boy", isn't there?

 

[Speculator]

One can only wonder how much of this rhetorical fluff remains in your system so you can willing pull it out of your sorry ass.

Deary me, attacking the person not the argument. You lefties are the same the world over, what is it that makes you so spiteful and full of hate?

With a proper budget which implements the right financial incentives with already established entities in the business, as well as proper budget cuts in other services that are over funded (such as Defense), it could over time be initialized, paid for and even generate a reasonable & steady profit. You know, if we're going start talking "the real" about this issue. Sadly, the only thing you're about on this thread is rhetorical tripe and pure ideological bullshit, so I won't hold you or anything you say with any substantial relevance. You make real fiscal conservatives look bad. You may want to try shutting up once in a while and letting real intellectuals speak.

The "real" fiscal conservatives had their shot in the 80's with Reagan and Thatcher, but it ended in financial disaster. But of course you've analysed all the data and mind your own mind up

And please... don't censor your slander for my sake. I'm sure there's a lot more you'd rather call "your boy", isn't there?

Sorry but are you suggesting that I'd like to use your sexual and racial status as a means for attacking you? I'm tempted to start involving the mods if you're going to continue to stoop to such levels. Cut it out.

 

[maxcok]

:crucified:​

I feel a bit like Jesus around here sometimes, my message is one of peace, tolerance and freedom - just do your own thing as long as you're not harming others - and the reaction towards me is often violent.

.:chairfall: :lmao: :rofl: This from possibly the board's most notorious sexist/racist/homophobic white supremacist.

I don't think I'll ever really understand human nature.

Truest thing you've ever said - by far.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Deary me, attacking the person not the argument. You lefties are the same the world over, what is it that makes you so spiteful and full of hate?

Wow... so you think this really works as an excuse after implying several times that people like MLB and myself are unintelligent, assuming that you're like Jesus and have the bigoted jurisprudence to refer to me as "your boy"? You started with the spitefulness and hate around here. And now, you refer to the "L-word" like it's some kind of shield to protect you from others illustrating just how ignorant you are. So typical of the blinded ideological hypocrite who provides nothing but vacuous, rhetorical rubbish as a solution to real life problems.

The "real" fiscal conservatives had their shot in the 80's with Reagan and Thatcher, but it ended in financial disaster. But of course you've analysed all the data and mind your own mind up.

That's the beauty of having an opinion... just like you ignorantly tout that I've analyzed data and came to my own conclusions like it's a bad thing, in order to have a coherent thought with real substance and credibility you would also have to do the same thing. But going by your seemingly unending posts of trifling, sectarian political grandiloquence it's obvious that you haven't.

Sorry but are you suggesting that I'd like to use your sexual and racial status as a means for attacking you? I'm tempted to start involving the mods if you're going to continue to stoop to such levels. Cut it out.

You're the one that voluntarily chose to dabble in language that has a long standing history of racially charged sentiment and being offensive. Nothing that I said to you could be framed as a stimulus for such a stupid remark. Other people have been banned from this board for doing the same thing. And ultimately you have not earned my respect to properly address me as "your boy". Your entitlement to free speech may have you thinking you're free to call me that if you want. But my entitlement to free speech allows me to put you in your place and illustrate how you stepped out of bounds. I'm the wrong one to try that with around here. Understand what that means and watch what you say. Or you can try and discuss the thread topic once again. Or you can go get the mods. Your call.

 

[Speculator]

Wow... so you think this really works as an excuse after implying several times that people like MLB and myself are unintelligent, assuming that you're like Jesus and have the bigoted jurisprudence to refer to me as "your boy"? You started with the spitefulness and hate around here. And now, you refer to the "L-word" like it's some kind of shield to protect you from others illustrating just how ignorant you are. So typical of the blinded ideological hypocrite who provides nothing but vacuous, rhetorical rubbish as a solution to real life problems.



That's the beauty of having an opinion... just like you ignorantly tout that I've analyzed data and came to my own conclusions like it's a bad thing, in order to have a coherent thought with real substance and credibility you would also have to do the same thing. But going by your seemingly unending posts of trifling, sectarian political grandiloquence it's obvious that you haven't.



You're the one that voluntarily chose to dabble in language that has a long standing history of racially charged sentiment and being offensive. Nothing that I said to you could be framed as a stimulus for such a stupid remark. Other people have been banned from this board for doing the same thing. And ultimately you have not earned my respect to properly address me as "your boy". Your entitlement to free speech may have you thinking you're free to call me that if you want. But my entitlement to free speech allows me to put you in your place and illustrate how you stepped out of bounds. I'm the wrong one to try that with around here. Understand what that means and watch what you say. Or you can try and discuss the thread topic once again. Or you can go get the mods. Your call.

Just as I said earlier, all your debates degenerate into internet based slanging matches.

If that's all you've got to offer then count me out, and no, saying "my boy" has absolutely no racial connotations whatsoever, it's certainly not as offensive as some of the expletives and accusations that you and Maxcok come out with.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Just as I said earlier, all your debates degenerate into an internet based slanging match.

No... just with people like you. People who engage in continued passive aggressive implications of intellectual and societal vacuousness, then get defensive and "blame it on the libs" when they're called out on it.

If that's all you've got to offer then count me out, and no saying "my boy" has absolutely no racial connotations whatsoever, it's certainly not as offensive as some of the expleteives and accusations that you and Maxcok come out with.

Referring to a black man as a "boy" can be perceived as racist. Look it up on Google if you care to enlighten yourself. But ultimately, whether or not you implied that is not the real issue. Again, you haven't earned my respect to relate to me with such loosely lipped salutations. People refer to one another as being stupid and ignorant on this board just as much as they look at dick photos. They also think of very decorative ways to express that ideal so you're not going to gain sympathy from anybody if you're offended that someone calls you that. However, I'm sure you didn't mean your comment to be a term of endearment either so the intent to insult remains in your statement and you chose the wrong words to express it.

So are we talking Health Care again or are you going to continue with your "Everyone should hate VinylBoy" crusade?

 

[Speculator]

No... just with people like you. People who engage in continued passive aggressive implications of intellectual and societal vacuousness, then get defensive and "blame it on the libs" when they're called out on it.



Referring to a black man as a "boy" can be perceived as racist. Look it up on Google if you care to enlighten yourself. But ultimately, whether or not you implied that is not the real issue. Again, you haven't earned my respect to relate to me with such loosely lipped salutations. People refer to one another as being stupid and ignorant on this board just as much as they look at dick photos. They also think of very decorative ways to express that ideal so you're not going to gain sympathy from anybody if you're offended that someone calls you that. However, I'm sure you didn't mean your comment to be a term of endearment either so the intent to insult remains in your statement and you chose the wrong words to express it.

So are we talking Health Care again or are you going to continue with your "Everyone should hate VinylBoy" crusade?

I find your willingness to use your sexual and racial status as a means to attack others deeply depressing and "passively aggressive" as you would say.

In three years upon another forum after clocking up over 3500 posts I've yet to mention a single word about gay or black people, do you know why? Because the posters on that forum have the decency to keep personal details like that to themselves and not parade their "victim" status around at every opportunity. You use you personal attributes as a trap and quite frankly I'm tired of it.

So yes read your racist comments in anything that others have written, while conveniently ignoring your own offensiveness when using terms such as "bullshit" and "asshole", your fake indignance just gives the cause a bad name.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

I find your willingness to use your sexual and racial status as a means to attack others deeply depressing and "passively aggressive" as you would say.

I let people know what I look like and my sexual preference is so there's absolutely no confusion about who I am. There are plenty of fakers and frauds on this board and I go to great lengths to let people know that there's nothing phony about me. Your insisting that I use my personal attributes to trap people is beyond stupid.

In three years upon another forum after clocking up over 3500 posts I've yet to mention a single word about gay or black people, do you know why? Because the posters on that forum have the decency to keep personal details like that to themselves and not parade their "victim" status around at every opportunity. You use you personal attributes as a trap and quite frankly I'm tired of it.

What you do on a different board has no relevance to what you do around here. You don't like that fact that I'm not afraid or ashamed to post a real photo of myself or declare that I'm gay? That's YOUR damn problem. The only one crying like a victim right now is you. Bottom line... you stepped out of bounds with a comment, I called you on it and you can't be man enough to own up to it. My race, sexual preference or political beliefs are not scapegoats for your social insecurities and societal ignorance.

So yes read your racist comments in anything that others have written, while conveniently ignoring your own offensiveness when using terms such as "bullshit" and "asshole", your fake indignance just gives the cause a bad name.

They're merely the response to the catalyst.
I never once claimed or implied that I never insulted or took shots at my adversaries. But even with my use of questionable scribe and my utter detest for your existence on this board, there are still some lines I never cross... unlike yourself. Recognize where you're trying to spew your tripe and understand that NOBODY here, including yourself, is that fuckin' naive. And if you are, then perhaps you should go back to that other board where nobody declares what they look like or who they rather sleep with. Or do you want to disingenuously whine and cry about how evil I am some more?

Someone let me know when this thread is about Health Care again, and when the intellectuals like Indy, MLB, maxcok or the like have something thought provoking and credible to say, please?

 

[Speculator]

I let people know what I look like and my sexual preference is so there's absolutely no confusion about who I am. There are plenty of fakers and frauds on this board and I go to great lengths to let people know that there's nothing phony about me. Your insisting that I use my personal attributes to trap people is beyond stupid.



What you do on a different board has no relevance to what you do around here. You don't like that fact that I'm not afraid or ashamed to post a real photo of myself or declare that I'm gay? That's YOUR damn problem. The only one crying like a victim right now is you. Bottom line... you stepped out of bounds with a comment, I called you on it and you can't be man enough to own up to it. My race, sexual preference or political beliefs are not scapegoats for your social insecurities and societal ignorance.



They're merely the response to the catalyst.
I never once claimed or implied that I never insulted or took shots at my adversaries. But even with my use of questionable scribe and my utter detest for your existence on this board, there are still some lines I never cross... unlike yourself. Recognize where you're trying to spew your tripe and understand that NOBODY here, including yourself, is that fuckin' naive. And if you are, then perhaps you should go back to that other board where nobody declares what they look like or who they rather sleep with. Or do you want to disingenuously whine and cry about how evil I am some more?

Someone let me know when this thread is about Health Care again, and when the intellectuals like Indy, MLB, maxcok or the like have something thought provoking and credible to say, please?

Note to Vinylboy, the world doesn't revolve around your personal qualities. So why do you twist every debate until it somehow turns out to be a black vs white issue?

I find this both self obsessive and racist, please grow up.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Are you through? The thread is supposed to be about Health Care, not about whether or not you think I'm a racist.

 

[maxcok]

. . . . it's certainly not as offensive as some of the expletives and accusations that you and Maxcok come out with.

Accusations? What accusations? You condemn yourself with your own words, dear boy. Do you really want me to link up the posts (again) where you declare yourself a proud white supremacist and condescendingly portray women and homosexuals as second class citizens?

I know exactly what you're up to with your ironic accusations of "passive aggression" and your poor persecuted martyr act. As VB would say, it's not a good look for you. As I have said, if you were any more transparent you'd be invisible. If only you were, oh Lamb of God.

Preaching "peace, tolerance and freedom"? Please. Give me a fukn break. What you preach is intolerance and white heterosexual male economic privilege wrapped in a "libertarian" facade. And who here has threatened you with "violence"?

I feel a bit like Jesus around here sometimes, my message is one of peace, tolerance and freedom - just do your own thing as long as you're not harming others - and the reaction towards me is often violent.

:crucified:​

LOLOLOL!​

 

[Speculator]

Referring to a black man as a "boy" can be perceived as racist. Look it up on Google if you care to enlighten yourself].

You know all this fuss you've made has allowed me to overlook one basic but fundamental fact, you call yourself VinylBOY but then cry "racist" when in a throwaway comment somebody mentions the term boy.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha :biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1:


the intellect of the left shines through once again!!

 

[B_VinylBoy]

You know all this fuss you've made has allowed me to overlook one basic but fundamental fact, you call yourself VinylBOY but then cry "racist" when in a throwaway comment somebody mentions the term boy.

the intellect of the left shines through once again!!

Actually, your ignorance shines through in so many ways here that I'm going to take REAL pride in making you look stupid. And I don't expect you to understand this either, but in the slim chance that you do I sincerely hope that you take it to heart (if you actually have one).


Earlier, you tried to refer to the fact that I'm a musician for your ignorant rhetoric. Well, let me inform you about some of the more obvious facts in the music industry:

DeAndre Cortez Way calls himself "Soulja Boy". Heard of him? I know you have.
Charles Williams refers to himself as "Charlie Boy".
Daniel Steward calls himself "Danny Boy".
A well known drummer by the name of Christopher Gholson calls himself "Drummer Boy". And so forth and so forth over many other decades of musicians.

I use the moniker "VinylBoy" because I'm a DJ... and I've used the name for nearly 2 decades on several message boards, forums and other kinds of online media. It's not the most original nickname, but it does serve its purposes. But I digress.

At the end of the day, it's all about context. An adult with any shred of civil scruple would know not to refer to someone as "boy" just because it's in a nickname unless they know beforehand that it's fine to do so. That's because of the history of its use and how it was implied in the past to unfairly oppress others. They don't ignorantly assume that it's OK. What you failed to notice (or comprehend) is that I specifically stated that calling a black man a "boy" can be considered racist. I never said that it's always the case. I even told you whether or not you meant that as a racist comment wasn't the issue. I warned you about this here and here.

Unfortunately, because you think you know everything and assume your supposed "intended context" will always shine through in your scribe without any attempts of articulate elaboration, you ignored all of this and instead went completely ballistic about me being a victim, and about how I try to trap people by disclosing my sexual preference and skin color on a penis site. Oops!

Just as you're the stimuli to the negative responses you receive, you're also the cause to your own demise when you foolishly assume the wrong things on a message board. So since you were beyond adamant in trying to make me look like the problem on this and many other threads, I had no problem giving you the rope to say a lot of rhetorical bullshit because eventually you'd hang yourself. And you did. I don't have to trap anyone... deep down, I knew you'd fuck yourself over.

For the third and final time, you and I do not respect one another. Therefore, I will not tolerate from you any attempt to refer or address to me with a street level colloquialism such as "my boy". You are not above me, and regardless of your age you are way far off from being my intellectual equal or superior. You should quickly learn YOUR place in this discussion and not try to go beyond that. Lastly, an adult would know not to refer to someone as "boy" just because it's in a nickname. Frequent posters who engage in political discussions on a board aimed at adults where the bulk of discussion is about big dicks, are not ignorant of the obvious so stop acting so fuckin' naive. Innocence is not your fragrance so don't try to wear it. I've been called much worse than "boy" on this board and in life by xenophobic people such as yourself. You can try to make this about me all you want, but in reality it's all about YOU right now.

Can we talk about health care now? Or am I still evil?

 

[Speculator]

Actually, your ignorance shines through in so many ways here that I'm going to take REAL pride in making you look stupid. And I don't expect you to understand this either, but in the slim chance that you do I sincerely hope that you take it to heart (if you actually have one).


Earlier, you tried to refer to the fact that I'm a musician for your ignorant rhetoric. Well, let me inform you about some of the more obvious facts in the music industry:

DeAndre Cortez Way calls himself "Soulja Boy". Heard of him? I know you have.
Charles Williams refers to himself as "Charlie Boy".
Daniel Steward calls himself "Danny Boy".
A well known drummer by the name of Christopher Gholson calls himself "Drummer Boy". And so forth and so forth over many other decades of musicians.

I use the moniker "VinylBoy" because I'm a DJ... and I've used the name for nearly 2 decades on several message boards, forums and other kinds of online media. It's not the most original nickname, but it does serve its purposes. But I digress.

At the end of the day, it's all about context. An adult with any shred of civil scruple would know not to refer to someone as "boy" just because it's in a nickname unless they know beforehand that it's fine to do so. That's because of the history of its use and how it was implied in the past to unfairly oppress others. They don't ignorantly assume that it's OK. What you failed to notice (or comprehend) is that I specifically stated that calling a black man a "boy" can be considered racist. I never said that it's always the case. I even told you whether or not you meant that as a racist comment wasn't the issue. I warned you about this here and here.

Unfortunately, because you think you know everything and assume your supposed "intended context" will always shine through in your scribe without any attempts of articulate elaboration, you ignored all of this and instead went completely ballistic about me being a victim, and about how I try to trap people by disclosing my sexual preference and skin color on a penis site. Oops!

Just as you're the stimuli to the negative responses you receive, you're also the cause to your own demise when you foolishly assume the wrong things on a message board. So since you were beyond adamant in trying to make me look like the problem on this and many other threads, I had no problem giving you the rope to say a lot of rhetorical bullshit because eventually you'd hang yourself. And you did. I don't have to trap anyone... deep down, I knew you'd fuck yourself over.

For the third and final time, you and I do not respect one another. Therefore, I will not tolerate from you any attempt to refer or address to me with a street level colloquialism such as "my boy". You are not above me, and regardless of your age you are way far off from being my intellectual equal or superior. You should quickly learn YOUR place in this discussion and not try to go beyond that. Lastly, an adult would know not to refer to someone as "boy" just because it's in a nickname. Frequent posters who engage in political discussions on a board aimed at adults where the bulk of discussion is about big dicks, are not ignorant of the obvious so stop acting so fuckin' naive. Innocence is not your fragrance so don't try to wear it. I've been called much worse than "boy" on this board and in life by xenophobic people such as yourself. You can try to make this about me all you want, but in reality it's all about YOU right now.

Can we talk about health care now? Or am I still evil?

Just incase you'd forgotten you don't make the rules up around here, is that clear, my boy?

And you're not even a real musician you're a DJ, what a fraud. You constantly inform us of your jet-setting lifestyle and how you're in demand globally because of your unique business talents, when all this time you've been filling in for an Ipod shuffle.

I'm very disappointed in you.

Oh and btw, Boy George, heard of him? Perhaps I'll call you Vinylgirl from now on, you cry enough to warrant the change.