Height vs penis size

killer cock

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Posts
206
Media
0
Likes
261
Points
293
Age
46
Location
Canada
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I would say height does not have anything to do with cock size. I am only 5'4" and am endowed quite well. But like in the porns, my fellow team mates in the locker room have no concept of size. I am always asked is that 10-12 x7-8 inches or what. when really i am just 9" on a really good day. but mostly 8.5"x6.75"
 

Zot57

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
316
Media
10
Likes
72
Points
248
Age
34
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by josher71@Jun 7 2004, 08:24 AM
Anyone have any first hand experience with the really tall, talkin 7ft plus. All these huge basketball players have gotta have a weapon way above normal. That would make sense, every other features on those big guys are huge. It may look proportional on them to look average but that would be at least 10"-12" to look average on those huge 7ft frames, wouldn't you think?
I was once with a guy who was somewhere around 6' 8".

I was somewhat surpised to discover I was bigger than him.

-- Erik
 

B_Black11

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
131
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
236
Age
34
I generally agree with those who don't believe that height has anything to do with how hung you are. My own experience with this is my weightlifting buddy who is short but hung big. i'd say he's 5'7-ish and about 8 or 9" and thick too.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
It's because there are no bones in the penis. However, it does correlate weakly with other anthropometric statistics. Length correlates negatively with waist size, for example. Length correlates somewhat positively with height as well.
 

ericbear

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Posts
2,920
Media
35
Likes
6,341
Points
568
Location
Santa Ana (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Here's an example of why you have to be careful when using statistical measures without paying attention to the causal mechanisms.

Some people have a large waist size not because they are built big, but because they are obese. In the case of an obese person, some of the penis length is hidden due to the extra thickness of the fat pad, and a shorter measurement results. (Indeed, I have met grossly obese men with a negative penis length-- the organ was buried in a depression in their fat.) If there are many obese people in the population (as in America today), a negative correlation of waist size and measured penis size could result in the overall population statistics, even if there is actually a weak positive correlation between penis length and overall skeletal size.
 

B_RoysToy

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Posts
7,115
Media
0
Likes
287
Points
283
Age
34
Location
memphis, tennessee
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I had always thought the size of a person's wrist depended more on bone density than on their fat percentage. Do we have any readers who have gained/loss lots of weight and know whether or not their wrists changed accordingly?
 

B_DoubleMeatWhopper

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2002
Posts
4,941
Media
0
Likes
111
Points
268
Age
45
Location
Louisiana
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by RoysToy@Jun 10 2004, 02:55 AM
I had always thought the size of a person's wrist depended more on bone density than on their fat percentage.
Re-read it, Luke. It's waist size, not wrist size. That one little difference of a letter changes the whole meaning! ;)
 

B_RoysToy

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Posts
7,115
Media
0
Likes
287
Points
283
Age
34
Location
memphis, tennessee
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Jun 10 2004, 05:15 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DoubleMeatWhopper @ Jun 10 2004, 05:15 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-RoysToy@Jun 10 2004, 02:55 AM
I had always thought the size of a person&#39;s wrist depended more on bone density than on their fat percentage.
Re-read it, Luke. It&#39;s waist size, not wrist size. That one little difference of a letter changes the whole meaning&#33; ;) [/b][/quote]
Damn, of course (here I sit grasping for excuses) Thanks for the heads up, DMW. I&#39;ve been thinking I needed to make an appointment with an ophthalmologist, so this puts it in stone.
 

B_Hung Muscle

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Posts
3,025
Media
0
Likes
111
Points
193
Age
56
Location
NYC but never stop traveling
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by killer cock@Jun 8 2004, 12:44 PM
I would say height does not have anything to do with cock size. I am only 5&#39;4" and am endowed quite well. But like in the porns, my fellow team mates in the locker room have no concept of size. I am always asked is that 10-12 x7-8 inches or what. when really i am just 9" on a really good day. but mostly 8.5"x6.75"
[post=241302]Quoted post[/post]​

I get the same thing. I&#39;m 5&#39;6" and am hung big -- close to 9 inches hard and big when flaccid. Guys always think I&#39;m 10, 11, 12 inches. No concept of a ruler... I think they&#39;re just judging against themselves and getting a false sense of perspective based on my height.
 

Donk

Experimental Member
Joined
May 17, 2004
Posts
323
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
238
Age
34
Originally posted by Hung Muscle+Mar 29 2005, 02:33 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hung Muscle &#064; Mar 29 2005, 02:33 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-killer cock@Jun 8 2004, 12:44 PM
I would say height does not have anything to do with cock size.  I am only 5&#39;4" and am endowed quite well.  But like in the porns, my fellow team mates in the locker room have no concept of size.  I am always asked is that 10-12 x7-8 inches or what. when really i am just 9" on a really good day. but mostly 8.5"x6.75"
[post=241302]Quoted post[/post]​

I get the same thing. I&#39;m 5&#39;6" and am hung big -- close to 9 inches hard and big when flaccid. Guys always think I&#39;m 10, 11, 12 inches. No concept of a ruler... I think they&#39;re just judging against themselves and getting a false sense of perspective based on my height.
[post=294730]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Maybe the other guys are also comparing it against their claims about themselves: "Well, if my [6 inch] dick is &#39;8&#39; inches, then his must be a foot&#33;" :)
 

Kat

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Posts
259
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
238
Location
Northeast United States
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Originally posted by curvedandthick@May 23 2004, 05:34 PM
Do you think that a person&#39;s height affects the way a man&#39;s penis looks. What I mean is that everyone assumes that a big man will have a big penis and this is not always true. For example, 2 different guys could each have a 7x5 penis and according to averages this is above normal sizes. The only difference is one guy is 6&#39;2 and the other is 5&#39;7. The shorter guy is going to look huge next to the taller guy. Do you guys think that big men are expected to have bigger penises and they have to be much bigger to meet those expectations?
[post=239149]Quoted post[/post]​


From my limited experience the size of the guy tended to match his penis size. My three boyfriends prior to meeting my husband were all average in penis size and were 5&#39;9" to 5&#39;11 inches in height and slim. My husband is a huge guy...6&#39;6" and 230 lbs and has a huge penis. However, from an optical illusion standpoint, it matches his body much the same as the other guys with smaller sized penises.
 

zaphod

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Posts
78
Media
4
Likes
21
Points
153
Location
Florida
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I&#39;m slender, 6&#39;5" and I have a 7" by 6" penis. However, the flacid size is only 3 1/2" to 4" by 5". You would never guess the erect size by seeing it flacid.