Hi,
I have some CK underwear that has been really annoying me for the past few months, because they dont seem to fit right whereas the rest of the world seem to praise CK's fitting and comfort.
So, I was looking at two that I own, and noticed some strange things about them and I took photos of them.
In the first two pictures, they are from a CK 365 range. The first picture doesnt have the "5% elastane" on the frontside of the label
Instead it is on the backside of the label as shown in picture 2.
The last two pictures are from the pro-stretch range.
NOTE the spelling in the third picture: the "8% Lycra Elastane" is actually spelt "8% Lyctra Elastone" !!
Am I right in assuming that these are fake? The pro-stretch is definitely a fake right because of the spelling mistakes?
If it helps, i bought them from ebay. The pro stretch ones came in boxes which had "photocopied" pictures on them, but I just thought that the seller just gave them in cheap boxes but the actual product was real
.
Are these fake?
thanks! :smile:
I have some CK underwear that has been really annoying me for the past few months, because they dont seem to fit right whereas the rest of the world seem to praise CK's fitting and comfort.
So, I was looking at two that I own, and noticed some strange things about them and I took photos of them.
In the first two pictures, they are from a CK 365 range. The first picture doesnt have the "5% elastane" on the frontside of the label
The last two pictures are from the pro-stretch range.
NOTE the spelling in the third picture: the "8% Lycra Elastane" is actually spelt "8% Lyctra Elastone" !!
Am I right in assuming that these are fake? The pro-stretch is definitely a fake right because of the spelling mistakes?
If it helps, i bought them from ebay. The pro stretch ones came in boxes which had "photocopied" pictures on them, but I just thought that the seller just gave them in cheap boxes but the actual product was real
Are these fake?
thanks! :smile: