First off people can label themselves anything they want. I don't think we need more example of that then those who call themselves pro-life. I don't think labeling yourself as something is at the heart of the issue here. I think it's still being able to gain respect with the label you've chosen which brings all the problems.
Most of the time people get upset with others because the labels they've chosen for themselves don't fit logically. Or there's an appearance of the labels not fitting logically.
Had to look the word up to fully understand it but as far as i can tell there's no sex included. Which confuses the hell out of me. I find men attractive all the time. I would never have sex with them because i'm straight but i do.
If there is sex involved though then yeah they're bisexual in the very least.
Yeah, the more i read up on it the more i'm confused. If this is based solely on finding someone of the same gender and opposite gender attractive then that would logically lead to everyone being both hertreoflexibe (?) and homoflexibe (?)?
I mean, who can't find celebs of both and all possible genders (including trans people) attractive? No one. Not really. So if the label is based on attraction then everyone is both things all the time. And if it isn't based on who we regularly have sex with then why label it a sexuality?
If it's based on sex and the categories of people we have sex with regularly...then there really is already an app for that.
So ya know what. I'm going to call this one as needing more discussion. Why more discussion.