hey mates have you ever seen a dick bigger than this????

quercusone

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Posts
1,135
Media
235
Likes
16,715
Points
618
Location
Dallas (Texas, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Still kicking myself for not being home in Copenhagen when he visited 2 years ago.... It would have been so fun...

Hmmmm.....I have 100,000 air miles I need to use.....where to go.....Hmmmm.....
 

yoursgetsmine

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Posts
350
Media
16
Likes
96
Points
173
Location
St Louis, MO
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
It's VERY big, but are the stats that you posted true......I'm guessing they are not. The problem is that a dick just a few inches bigger than normal looks gigantic to the eye of the beholder......and we're willing to almost believe what we're told regarding this optic interpretation...........because we LOVE big cocks!!!!
 

jojolongdong

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Posts
6,013
Media
148
Likes
15,417
Points
393
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
http://www.lpsg.org/members/swagg.html

take a look please.. I asked him about his measurements and he said 11.5x7.5 and it looks real not photoshopped!!! I always believed a penis that long didnt exist but I had to change my opinion... thoughts??

Thanks for sharing..... that is an impressive 'donkey sized' dick.
Not sure whether I've seen one bigger ?

I'm a believer.!
 

D_Salmaine Seamsplitter

Account Disabled
Joined
May 9, 2005
Posts
123
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Quercusone is considered to be the biggest guy here. I'm not saying he's not big and nothing personal etc but he really is not THAT big. It's just the lense that makes his dick look bigger and the rest of him smaller. Just look at some of his pictures where's his dick looks massive and rest is like head on a stick. Again, nothing personal. I'm just not going for that old trick.

But then again I really don't care.:smoker:
 

pcghabsy

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
2,573
Media
8
Likes
1,010
Points
333
Location
India
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Quercusone is considered to be the biggest guy here. I'm not saying he's not big and nothing personal etc but he really is not THAT big. It's just the lense that makes his dick look bigger and the rest of him smaller. Just look at some of his pictures where's his dick looks massive and rest is like head on a stick. Again, nothing personal. I'm just not going for that old trick.

But then again I really don't care.:smoker:

Everyone is using a wide angle lens. Plus he has enough pics with different angles and perspectives, some even with normal lenses so you get a clear idea. Q has taken the trouble to not go for cheap close-ups and also, there's no manipulation of any kind.

Finally, there's a solid measurement pic of his. He has removed it so I don't want to reveal the actual value. But all I will say is - it's one of the longest genuine measurements I have seen. You can still find it on other sites if you really look for it.
 
Last edited:

AlphaMale

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
3,055
Media
35
Likes
5,491
Points
468
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Everyone is using a wide angle lens. Plus he has enough pics with different angles and perspectives, some even with normal lenses so you get a clear idea. Q has taken the trouble to not go for cheap close-ups and also, there's no manipulation of any kind.

I wouldn't say everyone is using a wide angle lense. A lot of guys do, but I personally don't think it's so prevalent as to say that "everyone is doing it".

Secondly, the only photos taken with a normal lens that I can see are the soft or semi shots. Nearly all of the 'gargantuan erection' shots are definitely taken with fisheye lenses (which if I'm not mistaken isn't the only kind of wide angle lense, but given the concave effect in all the pics it's probably the one being used here). Something to similar to this example:

File:Focal length.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe there aren't "cheap close ups" as you put it, but at the same time I wouldn't call using a fisheye lense "no manipulation of any kind" either.
 
Last edited:

pcghabsy

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
2,573
Media
8
Likes
1,010
Points
333
Location
India
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I wouldn't say everyone is using a wide angle lense. A lot of guys do, but I personally don't think it's so prevalent as to say that "everyone is doing it".

Secondly, the only photos taken with a normal lens are the soft or semi shots. All of the 'gargantuan erection' shots are definitely taken with fisheye lenses (which if I'm not mistaken isn't the only kind of wide angle lense, but given the concave effect in all the pics it's probably the one being used here). Something to similar to this example:

File:Focal length.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe there aren't "cheap close ups" as you put it, but at the same time I wouldn't call using a fisheye lense "no manipulation of any kind" either.

A fisheye lens is an extreme wide angled lens. So while a wide angled lens is 18mm or so, a fisheye lens is about 9-14mm or so. The "concave effect" you refer to is what we call barrel distortion. The wider the focal length, the more the barrel distortion. By the way, the full wide end of most compact cameras is in the 18-25mm equivalent range, which is certainly wide angled. BTW, I wouldn't say he's using a fisheye lens. Fisheye will give extreme barrel distortion, like this: http://img20.mediafire.com/36ade5426e572a5556696de15ec4583a4g.jpg. This is merely usage of a wide angled lens - about 18mm. Which would still give barrel distortion, but not nearly as much as a fisheye lens.

But, fair enough. Since I am a photographer it's very easy for me to pick up on these things and compensate accordingly, so to me it's not really a manipulation. But I see your point.
 
Last edited:

D_Salmaine Seamsplitter

Account Disabled
Joined
May 9, 2005
Posts
123
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Oh yes I have seen his measurement picture. As I said, nothing personal and I agree he's big. But he's about 9 inches(if you take away the 1.5 or so inches that comes from holding your dick down while measuring and doing the pornstar thing with the base). 9 inches is still big but not just THE biggest there is.
 

AlphaMale

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
3,055
Media
35
Likes
5,491
Points
468
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
A fisheye lens is an extreme wide angled lens. So while a wide angled lens is 18mm or so, a fisheye lens is about 12mm or so. The "concave effect" you refer to is what we call barrel distortion. The wider the focal length, the more the barrel distortion. By the way, the full wide end of most compact cameras is in the 18-25mm equivalent range, which is certainly wide angled.

But, fair enough. Since I am a photographer it's very easy for me to pick up on these things and compensate accordingly, so to me it's not really a manipulation. But I see your point.

Yeah I mean I'm not saying he's small at all. With the help of the downcurve I think he can easily reach the 9" mark, similar to someone like runner9 (or in this thread's case: swagg ! :wink:).

I just think the photos with the wide angle lense help to 'stretch people's imaginations' into thinking that they're seeing something 10"+.
 

pcghabsy

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
2,573
Media
8
Likes
1,010
Points
333
Location
India
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeah I mean I'm not saying he's small at all. With the help of the downcurve I think he can easily reach the 9" mark, similar to someone like runner9 (or in this thread's case: swagg ! :wink:).

I just think the photos with the wide angle lense help to 'stretch people's imaginations' into thinking that they're seeing something 10"+.

I agree on all points. Even quercusone himself is amused by all the claims of his penis being 10+". :tongue:

Anyway, I am not sure should accuse him of using a wide angled lens. Like I said, it's just easier to take a picture with your zoom set to full wide. That's all.

And like I mentioned, he has put up an array of pics from all angles and perspectives.
 
Last edited:

D_Crystallized Ginger

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Posts
2,201
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
73
yes men.. he is big but not biggest at all.. mr thick, swagg, checkin, and especially wadex_bbc are very big and close to a real 10 IMHO... I can't get why he is considered the biggest here... it seems more like a legend than a real thing
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
684
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I am actually bigger than Q but I'll have to take better pictures/videos of it when I'll get my new cam.
A new cam will not increase the size of your willie.
And Q maybe than not be the biggest, he's certainly one of the biggest on this board. Top-10 for sure, not so many +9inchers on this board with valid pics...
 

TinyPrincess

Mythical Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Posts
15,847
Media
2
Likes
31,123
Points
368
Location
Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Hmmmm.....I have 100,000 air miles I need to use.....where to go.....Hmmmm.....

You and me both, love. I need to plan my next trip to the US better than last time. Wasting 3 days on a single meet and greet in LA.

Next time it's my turn to drop by...
 

AlphaMale

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Posts
3,055
Media
35
Likes
5,491
Points
468
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
And guys, stop the bitchy fisheye bull... Q has posted more than enough pics and movies to be free from this loser bull...

Q is one of the very few guys here who I'm absolutely certain can deliver...

What's bitchy or bull about it? We're just saying that he's using a wide angle and/or fisheye lense. Just an observation/statement of fact.

I don't think anyone is saying he's small or fake because of it.