Hillary, Hillary, Hillary... what you still doin' 'round girl?

faceking

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Posts
7,426
Media
6
Likes
277
Points
208
Location
Mavs, NOR * CAL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Why do I keep seeing this senator so much in the news... isn't she statistically eliminated?

If she would/could pull of the nomination (not sure how.. but...) wouldn't the moment on the GREATEST POLITICAL COMEBACK of all time that she'd be so unstoppable, that John McCain would drop on his knees to be her running mate....

I think she's got a trick up her sleeve, or pant suit.
 

VeeP

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Posts
1,752
Media
2
Likes
30
Points
268
Gender
Male
I'm convinced she'll do well enough to justify staying in until the bitter end and spark a credentials fight at the convention. A split delegate vs. popular vote (including MI, FL, or whatever) result is her only hope. If nothing else she'll run out the clock, do as much damage as possible to Obama and the party, get McCain elected, and set her sights on 2012.

Unless of course she manages to win IN and NC on Tuesday... then Denver, we have a problem!
 

D_Tintagel_Demondong

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Posts
3,928
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
I think she's got a trick up her sleeve, or pant suit.

A lawsuit?
Secret superdelegates?
Pimp out Chelsey (for real)?
She'll cry real tears?

I don't think that she has a prayer at this point, but maybe she has a trump card. The mud-slinging hasn't officially started, but Billary, with her shady past involving murder and fraud, has far more to lose than Obama.
 

kurios

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Posts
880
Media
0
Likes
83
Points
248
Location
Ontario, Canada
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
The arrogant self agrandizing cow is unfortunately not out of the race yet. She is in this for herself and doesn't give a damn what the division does to the party.
She thought she was President before (when Bill was elected). Her track record is all in her mind. However, that said, given time, people are begining to question Obama's accomplishments so it will come down to one who doesn't say he has done a lot and one that thinks she has by osmosis and hasn't. Sad!
 

faceking

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Posts
7,426
Media
6
Likes
277
Points
208
Location
Mavs, NOR * CAL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I just don't why/how the DNC lets this continue.... unless it's a strategy, which could prove successful. Course Howard Loony Dean is minding the helm.... so it could be ...
 

RandyL

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Posts
251
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
161
Location
Southwest PA, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
If Cunt Clinton gets elected, this country is FUCKED.

If Obama somehow becomes president, he'll eventually be shot.

And if Obama gets elected with Cunt Clinton as his VP, he'll DEFINITELY get shot so she can become president.

Watch and see.........
 

Stretch

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Posts
2,401
Media
54
Likes
2,984
Points
443
Location
Vienna (Austria)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Hillary, Hillary, Hillary... what you still doin' 'round girl?

If Cunt Clinton gets elected, this country is FUCKED.

If Obama somehow becomes president, he'll eventually be shot.

And if Obama gets elected with Cunt Clinton as his VP, he'll DEFINITELY get shot so she can become president.

Watch and see.........

Ironically FK...the same question can be asked of you, and RandyL...well your post is just the epitome of a well presented, logical, concise, constructive contribution to the advancement of human discourse. Well done...both of you
 

texas41-38

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Posts
771
Media
0
Likes
86
Points
248
Location
Dallas-Ft, Worth
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Why do I keep seeing this senator so much in the news... isn't she statistically eliminated?

If she would/could pull of the nomination (not sure how.. but...) wouldn't the moment on the GREATEST POLITICAL COMEBACK of all time that she'd be so unstoppable, that John McCain would drop on his knees to be her running mate....

I think she's got a trick up her sleeve, or pant suit.

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE CLINTONS. TO THE FAITHFUL HE IS DEMOCRATIC ROYALTY; McCAIN IS A ONE TRICK PONY THAT SHE WOULD CRUSH IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. OBAMA IS AN EMPTY SUIT (NOT THAT I WOULDNT HIT IT), BUT HE CAN ALSO BEAT McCAIN. I AM A CLINTON LACKEY FROM WAY BACK. THE LONGER SHE STAYS IN THE MORE LIKELY THAT SHE IS THE DEM NOMINEE AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT. WHEN COMPARED WITH THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION, SHE IS A MORTAL LOCK TO BE PRESIDENT.
 

Trinity

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
2,680
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
181
Gender
Female
Why do I keep seeing this senator so much in the news... isn't she statistically eliminated?

statistically eliminated from what? Overtaking Obama in pledged delegates? A slim lead in pledged delegates is not the criteria for the nomination. To secure the nomination a candidate must reach 2024 and Neither candidate can win the nomination without the superdelegates. Therefore she is not stastically out of the nomination.

I think she's got a trick up her sleeve, or pant suit.
No tricks...Sen. Hillary Clinton is just the better, more experienced candidate for President and she has alot more fight left in her...for this race, the general election and America.

The superdelegates will NOT overturn the winner of the pledged delegates....you can take that to the bank

There is no winner in the pledged delegates unless the candidate has secured 2024 pledged delegates. If superdelegates must decide between two candidates who are separated by less than 2% of the vote...they may take several factors into account. And nothing has been bankable in this race.

I usually find this type of response contemptible...but here, I :yawn: wholeheartedly agree with you, MLB.
You just used that type of response when faced with factcheck.org's negative review of Obama's false claim not to accept money from oil company's and lobbyists. right here... You must not find it too contemptible.

You questioned...

I answered. Obama accepts oil money and lobbyist money according to Factcheck.org.
 

D_Kaye Throttlebottom

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Posts
1,536
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
123
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE CLINTONS. TO THE FAITHFUL HE IS DEMOCRATIC ROYALTY; McCAIN IS A ONE TRICK PONY THAT SHE WOULD CRUSH IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. OBAMA IS AN EMPTY SUIT (NOT THAT I WOULDNT HIT IT), BUT HE CAN ALSO BEAT McCAIN. I AM A CLINTON LACKEY FROM WAY BACK. THE LONGER SHE STAYS IN THE MORE LIKELY THAT SHE IS THE DEM NOMINEE AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT. WHEN COMPARED WITH THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION, SHE IS A MORTAL LOCK TO BE PRESIDENT.
Trinity, dual idents are not allowed here :wink:
 

playainda336

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Posts
1,991
Media
223
Likes
2,357
Points
443
Location
Greensboro (North Carolina, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male

Trinity

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
2,680
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
181
Gender
Female
You do realize that is simply another blog site.

Sorry, it's not just a blog. Factcheck.org is a non-partisan consumer advocate for voters which is a project of the Annenburg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. And my original post was from the Los Angeles Times article: Barack Obama Still Takes In Oil Money which quotes not only Factcheck.org but the well respected non-partisan source The Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign donations:

"From our perspective, if there is a distinction between oil company PACs and lobbyists, and their executives, it is a mighty fine line," said Sheila Krumholz, director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign donations. "They all represent the same interest -- oil." LA Times

But while we're posting things, let's take an actual look at the numbers and I'll allow you to make your own evaluations:

I've already looked at the actual numbers...the numbers are quoted in the LA Times article and by Factcheck.org.

There is no significance in those two charts in relation to the fact that Obama has taken oil money from individuals. You should rather refer to the chart in the Factcheck.org article from the same source as the two charts you posted. Also refer to the LA Times article to fully understand that Obama indeed takes oil money...it's explained in explicit detail how Obama's claim "not to accept money from oil companies or lobbyists" amounts to false advertising.