Hillary, Hillary, Hillary... what you still doin' 'round girl?

Trinity

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
2,680
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
181
Gender
Female
He's not taking money from companies. He's taking money from people.

Adversely, Hillary is taking money from companies. As shown by the charts that I posted.

Once again, No candidate can take contributions from oil companies...it is against the law. Obama's statements are false and misleading. Obama is taking contributions from individuals that work in the oil industry the same as other candidates while criticizing it.

Obama claimed not to take oil money - he does:

Oil Industry Contributions to Obama

Oil Company Individual Contributions

ExxonMobil $30,850
Hess $5,200
Shell $9,900
Conoco Phillips $4,300
Chevron $9,500
BP $6,396

Total $66,146

Then Obama claimed not to take money from PAC's - he does:

According to the charts you posted, Obama has taken at least $13,000 in actual PAC money. But the bigger point is that Obama is attempting to make a distinction between the negative influence of PAC's and individual contributions from the oil industry which he claims not to accept but actually does accept. PAC's can only donate $5000. Individual contributions can outweigh a single PAC donation and can have even more influence based on Obama's hypocritical claims. Factcheck.org simply put it this way: We're not sure how a $5,000 contribution from, say, Chevron's PAC would have more influence on a candidate than, for example, the $9,500 Obama has received from Chevron employees giving money individually.


Obama claims not to take money from Washington lobbyists - Obama is splitting-hairs and insulting the intelligence of the American people.

Obama does not accept donations from registered lobbyists. However, he does accept contributions from spouses and family members of lobbyists, partners at law firms where lobbyists work if the partner is not registered to lobby, senior executives at companies that hire lobbyists, and state-level lobbyists. Among his top fundraisers are at least a few who were registered lobbyists as recently as last year and withdrew their registration to fundraise for Obama, according to Factcheck.org

The (Obama) campaign says it is making a "best effort" to stay away from tainted money. "It isn’t a perfect solution to the problem and it isn’t even a perfect symbol,” spokesman Burton has said.

On all counts, Obama is disingenuous.
 

B_boynextdoorkpt

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Posts
892
Media
0
Likes
13
Points
103
Location
Isle of Palms SC
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
She is not statistically defeated. If she wins both Indiana and North Carolina tomorrow, which all poles are saying she will, its pretty much over for Obama. Rev. Wright pretty much screwed Obama out of the race. Hillary has had more super delagates all along. The fact Obama has never won a big state, but only small, insignificant red states, means he could never win in a general election. Plus Hillary has the popular vote count.
 

playainda336

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Posts
1,991
Media
223
Likes
2,365
Points
443
Location
Greensboro (North Carolina, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
She is not statistically defeated. If she wins both Indiana and North Carolina tomorrow, which all poles are saying she will, its pretty much over for Obama. Rev. Wright pretty much screwed Obama out of the race. Hillary has had more super delagates all along. The fact Obama has never won a big state, but only small, insignificant red states, means he could never win in a general election. Plus Hillary has the popular vote count.
Yes...because Hilary wins these big states by HUGE MARGINS! DOUBLE DIGITS EVEN!

9.5%!!!

:biggrin1: