Interesting that you stopped reading when you found something you liked...
"The lawsuit was reviewed on an expedited basis by a special three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia who held that Mr. Rodearmel did not have standing and did not comment on the constitutional questions."
If you had bothered to continue you would have read:
"Judicial Watch filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court."
Which just happened to be at the bottom of the write-up. So yes, I READ THE WHOLE THING.
Not at all obvious from your post.
Oooooooooh... appeals. If there was probable cause to begin with, this wouldn't have been shot down the first time.
I guess appeals courts serve no purpose.
Besides, if this case ever did get to the Supreme Court, it would also be expedited and laughed out to obscurity just on the sheer fact that it's utterly stupid.
And YOU are a judicial scholar?
Just like you. Social bigots like you need to stop trying to interpret the Constitution like it's Holy Scripture.
I get the feeling you have a great dislike for the constitution.
I would not be surprised if you had similar regard for Holy Scripture.
You have no clue what it means, what it really stands for or whom it's geared to protect.
Wrong as usual.
You constantly take one line out of context, ignore the entire document and clauses that contradict your ideologies.
Excuse me. That was just what you did when you declared "Game Over"
But really, thanks for assuming that I didn't read the "whole thing", fuckin' moron. Apology accepted.
I unlike you have nothing to apologize for.
No apology was given.
Yet another instance of you twisting things to meet your needs.
Now go back to the Orly Taitz School of Document Forgery and make us another birth certificate.
Not at all obvious from your post.
And YOU are a judicial scholar?
I get the feeling you have a great dislike for the constitution.
I would not be surprised if you had similar regard for Holy Scripture.
Wrong as usual.
Excuse me. That was just what you did when you declared "Game Over"
I unlike you have nothing to apologize for.
No apology was given.
Do you mean that Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth?
That was done by some Obama flunky, not I.
I'M REALLY A GIRL.
N but it has to be heard under a lower appeals court first, and then the Supreme Court takes it up.
Actually it has been "leaked" from the White house that Hillary Clinton is being considered as a Nominee to the Supreme court as there appears to be 2 upcoming retirements. I think if she was asked By President Obama she would say yes.
Actually it has been "leaked" from the White house that Hillary Clinton is being considered as a Nominee to the Supreme court as there appears to be 2 upcoming retirements. I think if she was asked By President Obama she would say yes.
You have absolutely NO understanding of the law.Well that is a good way for someone whose poll numbers are plummeting to get rid of his #1 competition.
And this brings up an interesting point.
Has the pay of the Supreme Court Justices been increased recently?
The same argument used to say she is ineligible to be Secretary of State would then apply to appointment to the Supreme Court.
But I guess the Old Boy and Old Girl network would just ignore what The Constitution says.