Hilliary Clinton eligibility challenged

[midlifebear]

Well, Pit(h)bull obviously holds "holy scripture" in very high regard. Although he doesn't exactyly say which faith's holy scripture, I can only assume he's a fringe christian reactionist Hell bent on replacing the Constitution of the USA with his Holier Than Anyone Else's Bible. Yet, another "citizen" incapable of individual thinking. How sad.

 

[Pitbull]

I can only assume he's a fringe christian reactionist

You are wrong again.
You make assumptions based on what?
Or is it that you just write what you think is funny or insulting because of an inability to defend your positions?


Looks like midlifebear is just

Yet, another "citizen" incapable of individual thinking. How sad.

 

[B_VinylBoy]

Twitbull should just type the n-word 100 times in this thread and get it out of his system.

 

[ZOS23xy]

Another dog pile from Pitbull.

 

[Trinity]

My feelings aren't hurt.

You seem hurt in every post...angry and on some massive haterade.

You would have to matter to me to have any effect on me.

Really? Then simply express your political views and I express mine. Nope. You can't do that. You go into name calling and emotional tirades full of negativity.

I, like many others here, are just tired of your lies, insane rants, meaningless posts, and clearly delusional views.

I'm sure you are tired of Obama demonstrating and proving my posts to be true...but there are no lies, insane rants or meaningless posts or delusions on my part. :wink:

Insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results. Attempting an intelligent conversation with someone of your limited intellect is a pointless endeavor. Now please go back to drooling silently in a corner you crazy sack of $3!+

aww, see your feelings are hurt...there you go again with an outburst. And that sad pathetic comment doesn't insult my intellect...it insults yours. If you throw down with someone...don't go lame.

I wouldn't be surprised if President Obama appoints her to the Supreme Court and she accepts.

Hillary took the Secretary of State job for a reason. She could have stayed a United States Senator...doubt it was to get to the Supreme Court. :smile:

 

[StormfrontFL]

You seem hurt in every post...angry and on some massive haterade.

Really? Then simply express your political views and I express mine. Nope. You can't do that. You go into name calling and emotional tirades full of negativity.


I'm sure you are tired of Obama demonstrating and proving my posts to be true...but there are no lies, insane rants or meaningless posts or delusions on my part. :wink:



aww, see your feelings are hurt...there you go again with an outburst. And that sad pathetic comment doesn't insult my intellect...it insults yours. If you throw down with someone...don't go lame.



Hillary took the Secretary of State job for a reason. She could have stayed a United States Senator...doubt it was to get to the Supreme Court. :smile:

Bye Nancy. You are once again banished to the realm of the ignored, on here just as you are in life.

 

[Pitbull]

Twitbull should just type the n-word 100 times in this thread and get it out of his system.

VinylBoy is beginning to sound like a broken record.

Tell me again how brilliant you are.
Then add a string of four letter words to impress me with your vocabulary.

And finish off my informing me that Obama is black and anyone who dares to question and refuses to bow down is a racist.

I wasn't paying attention the first 1000 times.

 

[Industrialsize]

I'm sure you are tired of Obama demonstrating and proving my posts to be true...but there are no lies, insane rants or meaningless posts or delusions on my part. :wink:

http://www.lpsg.org/136763-globalization.html
http://www.lpsg.org/104130-lawsuit-filed-against-obama-citizenship.html
http://www.lpsg.org/103390-is-biden-being-replaced-hillary.html
http://www.lpsg.org/102514-fake-unity-dem-convention-rethinking.html
http://www.lpsg.org/102582-obama-smears-himself-refers-his.html
http://www.lpsg.org/96196-is-obama-afraid-of-girl.html
http://www.lpsg.org/96205-hill-democrats-miffed-at-obama.html
http://www.lpsg.org/92968-party-unity-dont-think-so.html
http://www.lpsg.org/80175-obama-took-himself-off-michigans.html
http://www.lpsg.org/102640-fundraising-woes-for-obama.html
http://www.lpsg.org/100746-a-presidents-speech-and-answer.html
http://www.lpsg.org/101522-gov-sarah-palins-speech-epic.html
and how could we forget:
http://www.lpsg.org/149064-obama-eligibility-challenge-moves-forward.html




Hillary took the Secretary of State job for a reason. She could have stayed a United States Senator...doubt it was to get to the Supreme Court. :smile:

Yes, Hillary took the SOS job because she supports the elected Democratic President AND his policies.

 

[Trinity]

Yes, Hillary took the SOS job because she supports the elected Democratic President AND his policies.

Obama solidified Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy experience by making her Secretary of State. Her husband's issues were nullified by Obama to make her Sec. of State. And finally, Hillary - State's Woman that she is fully backed him, is serving under him and serving valiantly this great nation as Sec. of State...no matter when that service should end.

She's was always fully qualified but now nobody can call her hard work First Lady experience. She's fully immunized by Obama's own actions.

I wouldn't be surprised if she runs again.:smile:

 

[Industrialsize]

Obama solidified Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy experience by making her Secretary of State. Her husband's issues were nullified by Obama to make her Sec. of State. And finally, Hillary - State's Woman that she is fully backed him, is serving under him and serving valiantly this great nation as Sec. of State...no matter when that service should end.

She's was always fully qualified but now nobody can call her hard work First Lady experience. She's fully immunized by Obama's own actions.

I wouldn't be surprised if she runs again.:smile:

You're right, I wouldn't be surprised if she ran again in 2016.

 

[StormfrontFL]

Obama solidified Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy experience by making her Secretary of State. Her husband's issues were nullified by Obama to make her Sec. of State. And finally, Hillary - State's Woman that she is fully backed him, is serving under him and serving valiantly this great nation as Sec. of State...no matter when that service should end.

She's was always fully qualified but now nobody can call her hard work First Lady experience. She's fully immunized by Obama's own actions.

I wouldn't be surprised if she runs again.:smile:

What color is the sky where you live? Is there any air in the windmills of your mind? The lights are on but there's nobody home.

You, my bipolar adversary, will probably jump back on the Hillary bandwagon even though politically you have nothing in common. Why? Because she's a woman? Are you a woman? Are you a man? Are you even human?

 

[Trinity]

I don't make insane rants or meaningless posts. There is no delusion on my part. We've being sparring for sometime now Indy and you should know by now that I've always backed up my comments.

I'm sure you are tired of Obama demonstrating and proving my posts to be true...but there are no lies, insane rants or meaningless posts or delusions on my part. :wink:

Globalization - Tea Party Movement believe much of what is said in the basis of that thread to be true or are concerned about it in terms of our Trade Deficit, our Nation's Debt and the weakness of our Economy.

First "North American Union and the Amero?" was pondered then "RFID" for all to discuss.

The discussion of Globalization was backed up with information from ABC news:

YouTube- Bush announces the Real ID System

Charlie Gibson on ABC demonstrates how the program progressed:

YouTube - Real I.D

If you aren't willing to educate yourself on the matter and formulate an actual substantive response, then you are the one wearing the Tin Foil Hat.

As the OP showed, Bush started the Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America. Obama stated he will resume it.

Lawsuit Filed Against Obama:Citizenship Ineligibility - Obama has yet to show his vault copy of his birth certificate and lawsuits are still pending as well as a Quo Warranto.

Is Biden Being Replaced by Hillary? - Article from the Huffington Post
Fake Unity at the Dem Convention & Rethinking the Nominee - Article from the LA Times.

Obama Smears Himself...Refers to his Muslim Faith - It's on youtube

Is Obama Afraid of a Girl? - He must be if he has to nominate Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court lol

Hill Democrats Miffed at Obama - Article from the Politico

Party Unity? Don't think So... - Article from the Huffington Post...talked about PUMA but the Tea Party Movement has graphed all those disillusioned into it's ranks.
Obama Took Himself off Michigan's Ballot - Fact. Indy you don't like facts?
Fundraising Woes for Obama - Article from the New York Times

A President's Speech & The Answer - President Clinton was the bomb. Admit it.
Gov. Sarah Palin's Speech was Epic - Gov. Palin gave another epic speech recently too!

and how could we forget:
Obama Eligibility Challenge Moves Forward - The lawsuits are still pending. Obama is in fact talking about citizenship challenges during prayer breakfasts.

 

[Trinity]

You're right, I wouldn't be surprised if she ran again in 2016.

Could be 2016...could be 2012. :biggrin1: Based on Obama's poll numbers I'd say sooner rather than later.

 

[Industrialsize]

What color is the sky where you live? Is there any air in the windmills of your mind? The lights are on but there's nobody home.

You, my bipolar adversary, will probably jump back on the Hillary bandwagon even though politically you have nothing in common. Why? Because she's a woman? Are you a woman? Are you a man? Are you even human?

Kind of boggles the mind. It's now obvious that Trinity loves her Palin, hates Obama, hates his health care plan, loves everything Fox. Back in 2008 it was a different story:

Trinity Said:
I was addressing in general terms her blanket statement that true Democrats have to vote Party line no matter what. Specifically, I'm a Democrat and agree more with a Democratic Platform than any other. However, that does not mean I must always support the Party or its Nominee.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both Democrats so they do have similar platforms. The Primary was so hard fought because they are not one in the same, they don't have the exactly the same positions on every issue and they don't have the same judgment, qualifications, experience or records.

A Democrat choosing between two Democrats will look at the few issue differences and the qualifications of the candidates to be the Best President. I agreed with Hillary Clinton's position on women's reproductive rights and trusted her record on the issue, I agreed with her Health Plan, I know her record on issues and what she has achieved throughout her life, I trusted her judgment on civil rights, national security, issues like FISA, gun control-- some of these issues where Obama has faltered. Obama has been running for president since he went to the IL Legislature. And has made contradictions on issues, changed his position on issues, skipped votes or voted present on issues. I don't trust what he will do on issues if elected.

The reason I do not support the Party's Candidate is twofold. I feel the Democratic Party candidate is not the best candidate for President and Obama is not qualified. And because the Democratic Party acted undemocratically in the nomination process which left this weak candidate with no validity for support because the process did not seem right.

http://www.lpsg.org/100746-a-presidents-speech-and-answer-2.html#post1681242

 

[dellmaqn66]

The venom spewed by those who have to have a party to think for them, wow. It must be difficult memorizing all of the party rhetoric, for those who have been indoctrinated, then be able to regurgitate it on a moments notice.

It makes me glad to see, after all these years, that my decision to not register in any political party was the right one. Ahhh, to be able to go into the voting booth and simply look for the pretty donkey or elephant.

 

[maxcok]

Hillary took the Secretary of State job for a reason. She could have stayed a United States Senator...doubt it was to get to the Supreme Court. :smile:

Passing on the usual incomprehensibility in those other statements, could someone please point out for me how anyone, no matter how stupid or delusional, could find any shred of logic in this, no matter how twisted or confused?

(Anyone but the Holy that is. I've given up trying to follow any shred of logic in their reasoning, no matter how twisted and confused.)

 

[StormfrontFL]

Passing on the usual incomprehensibility in those other statements, could someone please point out for me how anyone, no matter how stupid or delusional, could find any shred of logic in this, no matter how twisted or confused?

(Anyone but the Holy that is. I've given up trying to follow any shred of logic in their reasoning, no matter how twisted and confused.)

In Trinsanity's "mind" one must look at things differently. Up is left. Red is cold. Dogs have wings. In other words, nothing makes a lick of sense.

It seems as if doesn't want to see Hillary on the Supreme Court. Kinda funny seeing as how was once her biggest cheerleader.

 

[Trinity]

Kind of boggles the mind. It's now obvious that Trinity loves her Palin, hates Obama, hates his health care plan, loves everything Fox. Back in 2008 it was a different story:

I support Sarah Palin as a conservative leader. I have always been a Democrat. I don't support Obama or his policies, nor do I support the Dems with their current political behavior. I never supported Obama's healthcare plan. What came to be Obamacare is not supported by a majority of the American people even though he was elected so that shouldn't confuse you. I turned to Fox because CNN became a surrogate for Obama (and a majority of American followed suit in going to Fox...Fox is still kicking behind and taking names)

Nothing I said below is contradictory. I am Pro-life. I believe whether man has a law that makes abortion legal or illegal it between the woman and God about the life in her womb...as it has always been.

Reproductive rights go beyond roe v. wade.

Trinity Said:
I was addressing in general terms her blanket statement that true Democrats have to vote Party line no matter what. Specifically, I'm a Democrat and agree more with a Democratic Platform than any other. However, that does not mean I must always support the Party or its Nominee.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both Democrats so they do have similar platforms. The Primary was so hard fought because they are not one in the same, they don't have the exactly the same positions on every issue and they don't have the same judgment, qualifications, experience or records.

A Democrat choosing between two Democrats will look at the few issue differences and the qualifications of the candidates to be the Best President. I agreed with Hillary Clinton's position on women's reproductive rights and trusted her record on the issue, I agreed with her Health Plan, I know her record on issues and what she has achieved throughout her life, I trusted her judgment on civil rights, national security, issues like FISA, gun control-- some of these issues where Obama has faltered. Obama has been running for president since he went to the IL Legislature. And has made contradictions on issues, changed his position on issues, skipped votes or voted present on issues. I don't trust what he will do on issues if elected.

The reason I do not support the Party's Candidate is twofold. I feel the Democratic Party candidate is not the best candidate for President and Obama is not qualified. And because the Democratic Party acted undemocratically in the nomination process which left this weak candidate with no validity for support because the process did not seem right.

http://www.lpsg.org/100746-a-presidents-speech-and-answer-2.html#post1681242[/QUOTE]

 

[maxcok]

The venom spewed by those who have to have a party to think for them, wow. It must be difficult memorizing all of the party rhetoric, for those who have been indoctrinated, then be able to regurgitate it on a moments notice.

It makes me glad to see, after all these years, that my decision to not register in any political party was the right one. Ahhh, to be able to go into the voting booth and simply look for the pretty donkey or elephant.

Who you talkin to, Willis? Register however you want, but don't assume you sit on some lofty pedestal breathing rarified air. There are great advantages to being aligned with a party in terms of organization and resources. Just because I'm a registered Democrat does not mean that I tow the party line or vote the party line.

I am as quick to criticize my own people when I disgree with them as the opposition. That doesn't happen nearly so often, because my party more often than not represents values that are important to me - Humanist values for starters, opposed to the accumulation of more wealth for the already privileged. A couple of other differences - my people are generally open to having a reasonable intelligent discussion of the issues and don't rely on the morning's printout of party line talking points.

 

[Industrialsize]

I support Sarah Palin as a conservative leader. I have always been a Democrat. I don't support Obama or his policies, nor do I support the Dems with their current political behavior. I never supported Obama's healthcare plan. What came to be Obamacare is not supported by a majority of the American people even though he was elected so that shouldn't confuse you. I turned to Fox because CNN became a surrogate for Obama (and a majority of American followed suit in going to Fox...Fox is still kicking behind and taking names)

Nothing I said below is contradictory. I am Pro-life. I believe whether man has a law that makes abortion legal or illegal it between the woman and God about the life in her womb...as it has always been.

Reproductive rights go beyond roe v. wade.

Trinity Said:
I was addressing in general terms her blanket statement that true Democrats have to vote Party line no matter what. Specifically, I'm a Democrat and agree more with a Democratic Platform than any other. However, that does not mean I must always support the Party or its Nominee.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both Democrats so they do have similar platforms. The Primary was so hard fought because they are not one in the same, they don't have the exactly the same positions on every issue and they don't have the same judgment, qualifications, experience or records.

A Democrat choosing between two Democrats will look at the few issue differences and the qualifications of the candidates to be the Best President. I agreed with Hillary Clinton's position on women's reproductive rights and trusted her record on the issue, I agreed with her Health Plan, I know her record on issues and what she has achieved throughout her life, I trusted her judgment on civil rights, national security, issues like FISA, gun control-- some of these issues where Obama has faltered. Obama has been running for president since he went to the IL Legislature. And has made contradictions on issues, changed his position on issues, skipped votes or voted present on issues. I don't trust what he will do on issues if elected.

The reason I do not support the Party's Candidate is twofold. I feel the Democratic Party candidate is not the best candidate for President and Obama is not qualified. And because the Democratic Party acted undemocratically in the nomination process which left this weak candidate with no validity for support because the process did not seem right.

http://www.lpsg.org/100746-a-presidents-speech-and-answer-2.html#post1681242

[/QUOTE]Please explain to me how a "President Hillary Clinton's" health care reform plan and President Obama's would differ on the basic substance.