Hmm. Gay or Straight?

[mandoman]

Telling another dude he should make porn because he has a big dick is not in anyway an indication of his sexual orientation (unless he was really flirting with you?). Men talk about big peters they see all the time in the pornos ...

I shouldn't say this, but my dad had trucker friends who commented on his size ALL THE TIME. How did they know? Seeing him piss on several occasions. He got loads of attention (yep, from the guys), but that was ages ago.:biggrin1: Porn was his "missed" career, too!

I find this really easy to believe, having seen your fine pictures.
What a man!

 

[Caelestis]

Would a straight guy say that?

Absolutely, especially if I thought it might make him feel awkward.

 

[maxcok]

You're kidding right? You first of all try to call me a hypocrite and you then try to infer that my opinion is less than yours because I'm new to the site and you say that you're not being defensive?

Defensive? You've got to be joking. What do I have to be defensive of? And I didn't call you a hypocrite, nor did I 'infer' your opinion was less because you're a newbie. I fukn hate it when people put words in my mouth and try to twist my posts around. Please don't do that. My point was that you might try to be a little less condescending and not respond by insulting my intelligence right off the bat.

I really couldn't care less if you were hostile or not I was merely trying to understand why you were hostile. It would seem that you have taken every one of my posts the wrong way and have been quick to attack for absolutely no reason.

There you go with the "hostility" again, which you care so little about you can't stop bringing it up. Dude, like I said, I have a difference of opinion with you. It's not hostility, and it sure as hell isn't an "attack". Just like you exaggerated the circumstances in the OP's scenario, you're trying to exaggerate this. Please stop now.

To reiterate:

For craps sake, lighten up.

 

[haulthat]

Suggesting a guy is both rude and homosexual based of the situation that was described could easily be perceived as homophobic. I didn't perceive it as such, I was just explaining why and how it could be by some. Hence your little discussion with the max of cock. You seem to take "umbrage" pretty easily. Don't take shit so seriously... but ya, what you meant isn't always what is picked up by others. Just how it works man.

I'm sorry I take real umbrage with that comment - I want you to tell me how the few words I've posted in this thread could be construed as homophobic. If someone has take. My two posts to anti-gay then it says more about them than it does me.
To me making a person that makes comment on a persons appearance, whether it be good or bad comments, without invite or without really knowing that person is a sign of a pass-remarkable person - something which I consider to be rude.

Having expressed that opinion I do not expect to be bracketed as a homophobe I would however expect someone to realise the difference between inviting comments, which I have clearly done by posting pictures, and not inviting comments when you are just changing in a locker room. To me the difference is distinct though it would appear that not all appreciate it.

 

[D_Etienne Neerdowell]

Suggesting a guy is both rude and homosexual based of the situation that was described could easily be perceived as homophobic. I didn't perceive it as such, I was just explaining why and how it could be by some. Hence your little discussion with the max of cock. You seem to take "umbrage" pretty easily. Don't take shit so seriously... but ya, what you meant isn't always what is picked up by others. Just how it works man.

And I quote my original post -

It's possible that he's just a very rude hetrosexual male.

You tell me where in that post that it says that the guy was gay?

Maybe I take umbrage because people can't read a ten word post without projecting their own insecurities onto it.

 

[D_Etienne Neerdowell]

Defensive? You've got to be joking. What do I have to be defensive of? And I didn't call you a hypocrite, nor did I 'infer' your opinion was less because you're a newbie. I fukn hate it when people put words in my mouth and try to twist my posts around. Please don't do that. My point was that you might try to be a little less condescending and not respond by insulting my intelligence right off the bat.

There you go with the "hostility" again, which you care so little about you can't stop bringing it up. Dude, like I said, I have a difference of opinion with you. It's not hostility, and it sure as hell isn't an "attack". Just like you exaggerated the circumstances in the OP's scenario, you're trying to exaggerate this. Please stop now.

To reiterate:

Cool man, just chill out. Possibly thr following will prove that I'm not putting words in your mouth.

He wasn't staring:
And even if it were a lingering look, which it wasn't, who cares?

Put on the blinders now. Musn't look at the naked man. OMG, he has a dick? Don't look! Don't look!

This isn't about the OP, is it? It's about your paranoia that some guy might randomly check out your goods.

Yet inexplicably, you've started seven threads in the first 10 days you've been here asking people to look at your dick and comment, like this: Big Cock Lubed Up. I really don't understand this phenomenon, where guys plaster their cock all over the internet, but don't want anyone to see it IRL. It seems weirdly conflicted to me.

For craps sake, lighten up.

Yeah you're right it doesn't appear that post that you're inferring that I'm a hypocrite. Fuck, if that isn't calling someone a hypocrite then I don't know what is.

You say exaggerated the circumstances of the OP's situation - perhaps I did but it in reality it doesn't make that much of a difference to the context of the situation nor does it hold any reason why you would insinuate hypocrisy.

Yeah, I don't think so, but thanks for the deep insight, n00b.

Again apologies, this post is certainly the work of someone open to a mature adult debate. A person who thinks if he tries to belittle someone then it means that he won't have to engage in a proper discussion

And what was my post that started you off on this sorry path -

It is not necessarily the act, it's the context in which it is done. What is it you are told when you are a child "never stare at people" - it just seems rude to me.

Might be different if he was showing his wares in a sex club but he was changing in a gym.

So the point I was making that it was the context of the situation. We indeed come from different cultures where possibly we see many things in a different light yet you made no effort to understand that, and from what I've read thus far you've taken a rather arrogant stance by completely disregarding anything I said in the above post.

Granted perhaps the language I've used in places has been sensationalist (perhaps swap "attack" with "disagree") but the underlying principles are the same and the fact that you choose to ignore any of the material points that I've raised.

The one thing to take from this is please don't try to post smart-arse responses to my posts without trying to understand my position first. You're correct I was condescending but in my opinion it was fully warranted.

I'm now bored to fuck with this as you clearly don't get anything that I write and I think I've made my point, but you strike me as the type of person that needs to have the last word -go on prove me wrong.

 

[maxcok]

:rolleyes2:

I fukn hate it when people put words in my mouth and try to twist my posts around.

Please don't do that.

For craps sake, lighten up.

Please stop now.

 

[D_Etienne Neerdowell]

:rolleyes2:

I'm now bored to fuck with this as you clearly don't get anything that I write and I think I've made my point, but you strike me as the type of person that needs to have the last word -go on prove me wrong.

There's only one thing better than someone proving you wrong and that's someone proving you right. True to form mon frere.

 

[maxcok]

.

 

[haulthat]

Wasn't a projection of insecurity, it was my mind organizing things in a way that made sense. Suggesting it was a rude heterosexual male is just weird to me cause come from a straight guy I REALLY don't see how it could be anything but a compliment. Either way I don't get it. This wasn't an algebra equation I was trying to solve. Either way... I think you and Max should just fuck and release the sexual tension so the man on man cock commenting can continue in peace. You might enjoy it, first times the best :wink:

And I quote my original post -

You tell me where in that post that it says that the guy was gay?

Maybe I take umbrage because people can't read a ten word post without projecting their own insecurities onto it.

 

[maxcok]

No thank you. :yuck:







BTW, I don't know if y'all have noticed, but the OP hasn't returned since opening the thread. Which just proves, in case there was any doubt, that he didn't have a dilemna and wasn't seeking advice at all. Like most threads of this nature, it was just a ploy to drive people to his gallery and get them to comment on his cock.
I doubt the scenario even happened.

 

[D_Etienne Neerdowell]

Wasn't a projection of insecurity, it was my mind organizing things in a way that made sense. Suggesting it was a rude heterosexual male is just weird to me cause come from a straight guy I REALLY don't see how it could be anything but a compliment. Either way I don't get it. This wasn't an algebra equation I was trying to solve. Either way... I think you and Max should just fuck and release the sexual tension so the man on man cock commenting can continue in peace. You might enjoy it, first times the best :wink:

Is that what you consider to be an apology?

You need to work on your people skills.

Good debate guys - see you further on down the line no doubt.

 

[MGTuohey]

referring back to the original post....

scene, backstory, two guys....

sounds like you have the plot worked out for your first movie.. ;-)

 

[Fire Stick]

No thank you. :yuck:







BTW, I don't know if y'all have noticed, but the OP hasn't returned since opening the thread. Which just proves, in case there was any doubt, that he didn't have a dilemna and wasn't seeking advice at all. Like most threads of this nature, it was just a ploy to drive people to his gallery and get them to comment on his cock.
I doubt the scenario even happened.

Maxcok: I am the Original Poster of this thread, and I object to your comment. The event which generated my post is an actual occurrence, is accurately described, and is an earnest inquiry concerning a subject relevant to this site. While I generally agree that a fair amount of bull shit exists on many internet sites, including this one, and that sometimes skepticism is warranted, you have nothing to substantiate your accusation, which publicly insults me, calls me a liar, and challenges my intentions. Your comment is completely unprovoked, startlingly spiteful, and ill-mannered. I am not holding my breath, but I beleive you owe me an apology.

Thanks to others who have replied to my post. I have enjoyed reading the responses and have found many of them helpful. I will take this opportunity to clarify that I was in no way offended by his remark. I was amused, flattered, and mainly caught by surprise, since he never struck me as someone who would make such a remark, particularly not so freely. Although I am used to receiving comments, I can usually pin down what’s behind them, and this guy is an enigma to me.