Homoerotic Scenes in Straight Porn.

[GeoSp]

anybody saved this one? can't believe I missed it D:

Go to charles dera thread there are all the videos with donnie rock

 

[Lonster]

Pretty hot interaction. I don’t think there’s anything bisexual in this video BTW.
Bisexual MMF — Help me out bro

So one guy jerking another guy's dick isn't bi? Sorry but I disagree.

 

[gabs]

[Alert golden shower]
Lots of wet kiss... And cum kiss at the end.

https://txxx.com/videos/1760524/lucy-bell-loves-golden-showers-pornxn/?skip=10&source=

Do you know who the male model is?

 

[JWF1959]

[Alert golden shower]
Lots of wet kiss... And cum kiss at the end.

https://txxx.com/videos/1760524/lucy-bell-loves-golden-showers-pornxn/?skip=10&source=

Do you know who the male model is?

His name is Denis Reed.

This should have been posted in the "snowballing" video thread, not this one. You can't have homoeroticism in a video if there is only one dude.

 

[Darkos]

His name is Denis Reed.

This should have been posted in the "snowballing" video thread, not this one. You can't have homoeroticism in a video if there is only one dude.

Well, I disagree. The camera angle is what is homoerotic, because it emphasizes the beauty of his cock and balls

 

[DeclanBrent]

This thread is littered with guys complaining that posts don't belong here. Sort of ruins it for people scrolling through when there's so much bickering and also so much ambiguity in the actual posts. Why isnt the thread split into homoerotic gay/bi and homoerotic straight? That would seem to make perfect sense and avoid confusion. I come here for the straight stuff and find it a huge waste of time when I watch something only to discover when one guy nibbles on the other guy's dong that it's obviously gay/bi. The problem is probably with the word homoerotic which can probably be defined both ways, excuse the pun.

 

[HellaX24]

This thread is littered with guys complaining that posts don't belong here. Sort of ruins it for people scrolling through when there's so much bickering and also so much ambiguity in the actual posts. Why isnt the thread split into homoerotic gay/bi and homoerotic straight? That would seem to make perfect sense and avoid confusion. I come here for the straight stuff and find it a huge waste of time when I watch something only to discover when one guy nibbles on the other guy's dong that it's obviously gay/bi. The problem is probably with the word homoerotic which can probably be defined both ways, excuse the pun.

Well, I disagree. The camera angle is what is homoerotic, because it emphasizes the beauty of his cock and balls

There is a post of what the creator of the thread finds homoerotic and what he's asking other posters to provide. However, people simply cannot do that, they want to post what they think is homoerotic and to tell with why this thread was created. The OP recently made another post reiterating what he created the thread for and people don't read, don't care and it goes round and round.

The way the camera emphasizes the cock and balls. Really?

 

[DeclanBrent]

@HellaX24 Non compliance means an obviously very popular topic is ruined for the rest of us. This would be my first choice of topic but over the past few months I've skipped it entirely. Came on this evening and nothing has changed. This is one place the moderators can step in surely. Nobody is going to be offended by creating a thread that says Homeorotic - Straight Only and Homerotic - Gay/Bi Only. In fact, the vast majority of members would probably be very grateful and pleased. There also isn't much room for doubt. When a male sucks another male's cock or licks his balls or does anything sexually motivated to his backside, or kisses him, or strokes his knob or rubs himself against the other male, then that is palpably bi/gay, regardless if the male in his private life is as straight as an arrow.

 

[Darkos]

There is a post of what the creator of the thread finds homoerotic and what he's asking other posters to provide. However, people simply cannot do that, they want to post what they think is homoerotic and to tell with why this thread was created. The OP recently made another post reiterating what he created the thread for and people don't read, don't care and it goes round and round.

The way the camera emphasizes the cock and balls. Really?

Yes, really, really homoerotic I'm thankful to whoever posted the video, it's really hot. It's not necessary to see more guys in a frame to make it homoerotic.

Is it straight porn? Yes, it is. Is it homoerotic? To me it really is - because of the reasons I've written above.

Don't kill the fun with too much shit like this. Enjoy what you like and skip what you don't like. As simple as that. Cheers.

 

[HellaX24]

Yes, really, really homoerotic I'm thankful to whoever posted the video, it's really hot. It's not necessary to see more guys in a frame to make it homoerotic.

Is it straight porn? Yes, it is. Is it homoerotic? To me it really is - because of the reasons I've written above.

Don't kill the fun with too much shit like this. Enjoy what you like and skip what you don't like. As simple as that. Cheers.

AGAIN THIS IS NOT WHAT THE THREAD WAS CREATED FOR, TAKE YOUR TAKE ON HOMOEROTICISM AND CREATED YOUR OWN THREAD.

 

[frimmingtheflim]

AGAIN THIS IS NOT WHAT THE THREAD WAS CREATED FOR, TAKE YOUR TAKE ON HOMOEROTICISM AND CREATED YOUR OWN THREAD.

You didn't even create the thread though. Jees.

 

[Darkos]

AGAIN THIS IS NOT WHAT THE THREAD WAS CREATED FOR, TAKE YOUR TAKE ON HOMOEROTICISM AND CREATED YOUR OWN THREAD.

Wow, your frustrations are amazing. It's almost fun

This is a free speech zone, and you should let the creator of the thread say the things you're saying, or even better - the admins of the forum. You're not the one who's setting the rules

We all have different understanding of homoerotic things in str8 porn here, and you just have to accept that, mate

 

[Darkos]

Wow, your frustrations are amazing. It's almost fun

This is a free speech zone, and you should let the creator of the thread say the things you're saying, or even better - the admins of the forum. You're not the one who's setting the rules

We all have different understanding of homoerotic things in str8 porn here, and you just have to accept that, mate

The first sentence of the first post here:
"I've only seen 3 homoerotic scenes in straight porn."

The last sentence:
"Any other scenes come to mind for you?"

You see, it does NOT say, "at least two guys must be included!".


There are 522 pages of porn is here, where I don't like 50% of it, but I don't care, I'll just skip and find what turns me on. Chill.

 

[HellaX24]

As the founder of this group I think part of the issue is there is a legitimate MMF Bisexual Video Thread found here :MMF Bisex. It has been dead lately because all the videos that should have gone there have gone here. Perhaps it is because the title doesn't say porn. Also, as in all other areas, bisexuality gets hidden , this time under the category Everything Else, because typically male bisexuality so often gets swept under the rug. Also so many people are not sophisticated sexually enough to recognize the difference in the terms homoerotic and bisexual, largely because 90% of bisexual males are still closeted so they never discuss the finer points with friends. There is gay culture, straight culture, but no bi culture. None at all!!!

Wow, your frustrations are amazing. It's almost fun

This is a free speech zone, and you should let the creator of the thread say the things you're saying, or even better - the admins of the forum. You're not the one who's setting the rules
We all have different understanding of homoerotic things in str8 porn here, and you just have to accept that, mate

This isn't a free speech board, no board is free speech. It has rules and guidelines and the owner and staff can remove or censor it as they see fit. You small-minded people like to throw around the term free speech and yet don't seem to know how and why this used for because you're too busy improperly using it. Look it up.

The first sentence of the first post here:
"I've only seen 3 homoerotic scenes in straight porn."

The last sentence:
"Any other scenes come to mind for you?"

You see, it does NOT say, "at least two guys must be included!".


There are 522 pages of porn is here, where I don't like 50% of it, but I don't care, I'll just skip and find what turns me on. Chill.

He was asking if you knew of anymore of those three types of scenes. Not for people to interpret it into the way a camera focuses on a set of cock and balls. Stupidest fucking thing I've ever read.

Why have people literally posting gay scenes in here and can not comprehend that that isn't what this thread is for, bisexual scenes being posted when there is a thread all ready for it, but people like you don't read or have a simple comprehension skills? They just see the pictures.

Also why do fuckheads always want people to adhere to their way of thinking when called out of the ignorance of their mentality? I'm not one of your dimwitted mates and I don't need to chill. Pull your fucking head out, Fredo

 

[HellaX24]

You didn't even create the thread though. Jees.

What's your point?

 

[JWF1959]

Charles Dean and Erik Everhard

 

[3790721]

Well, I disagree. The camera angle is what is homoerotic, because it emphasizes the beauty of his cock and balls

I'm sorry but this is just dumb. Create your own "solo homoerotic camera angles" thread then.

Charles Dean and Erik Everhard

View attachment 13239001 View attachment 13239011

NOW that's homoerotic stuff. Thank you.

 

[norfolkdiva]

Charles Dean and Erik Everhard

View attachment 13239001 View attachment 13239011

Do you think Erik fucks Charlie?

 

[DOCO197]

Do you think Erik fucks Charlie?

Best position ever ever ever …

Busty witch gets double analed by two guards to pay her sins

 

[DOCO197]

Super str8 porn stars Ramon & Mick Blue in brutal Homoerotic…

Redhead Maddy OReilly gets her juicy pussy and asshole slammed hard