Homophobes in the media... Are they all fugly?

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
No, they're not. There are lots of exceptions. Here are three:

David Dreier, California congressman

Aaron Schrock, Illinois congressman

Charlie Crist, former Fla governor
I dated someone who looked like David Dreier. I always thought that ex was good looking.

Aaron Schrock is to white bread for my tastes, and bland. So overall good looking, in a very generic way, to be unappealing to me.

Charlie is ok looking, though his forehead is a bit on the wide side. Otherwise fairly decent looking.

If i knew NOTHING about them, and just saw them, i might think each was attractive to some degree.
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
No, they're not all fugly. There are lots of exceptions. Here are three:

David Dreier, California congressman

Aaron Schrock, Illinois congressman

Charlie Crist, former Fla governor

Charlie Crist is a closeted homosexual!!!! What??? I didn't take time to look at the other two but what is it with you offering up guys who are either well known closet cases or admitted bisexuals???
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Are you seriously trying to argue Marcus Bachmann isn't gay???

Huh???
No I am seriously conflicted about that particular face type being used as some weird gay trope. Not all gays look that way, so the whole "gay face" thing grates even more me.

I will say that he reminds me of some other famous closet cases and "reformed" gays, facially.

See this is why i am of a few minds about him as an example.
 

ConanTheBarber

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Posts
5,306
Media
0
Likes
2,087
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Charlie Crist is a closeted homosexual!!!! What??? I didn't take time to look at the other two but what is it with you offering up guys who are either well known closet cases or admitted bisexuals???
I'm offering homophobes. What are you asking for?
And if your position is that homophobes are homosexual (and you've been pretty clear about that), then what are you carping about anyway?
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
No, they're not all fugly. There are lots of exceptions. Here are three:

David Dreier, California congressman

Aaron Schrock, Illinois congressman

Charlie Crist, former Fla governor

Are you honestly trying to argue Aaron Schick isn't gay???

500x500x0611schocking.jpg
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Charlie Crist is a closeted homosexual!!!! What??? I didn't take time to look at the other two but what is it with you offering up guys who are either well known closet cases or admitted bisexuals???
Wait a frippin minute!

Were not YOU the one who said that ALL homophobes were closet cases! And if these guys admitted bi tendencies bit then recanted it and went threw "therapy" or "spiritual cleansing" or any other BS, how the hell does that make them LESS of a homophobe, especially of there constituents accept that they had a "fall from grace" but were "reborn" (all the while vilifying gays)?

I would say Conan was Spot the fuck on!
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
I'm offering homophobes. What are you asking for?
And if your position is that homophobes are homosexual (and you've been pretty clear about that), then what are you carping about anyway?

You are missing the entire point here. Trying to debate with you is like trying to get a brick wall to start a conversation.

Are you normally like this or are you just trying to be a total dick to me whenever possible?

Which part of "gay face" escaped you? The point is if the guy is obviously gay then he does not count.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Are you honestly trying to argue Aaron Schick isn't gay???

ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting
Ummmm...

I'm offering homophobes. What are you asking for?
And if your position is that homophobes are homosexual (and you've been pretty clear about that), then what are you carping about anyway?
Thats what I want to know...

Mike you say in your opening post:

Since its being debated if all the homophobes in the media are fugly guys no gay guy would ever want to hook up with, please post the pic of any man making homophobic comments in the media. Btw, guys with total gay face does not count....

We are providing you with homophobes, as per yer request.

Do I need to pull over yer posts in SC therad where ya flat out say that?

I've noticed a couple of things about homophobia:

1) the gayest guy in the group will be the one to make a homophobic remark

2) the guys who hate gay men are the guys no gay guy would ever want to hook up with

3) homophobes turn to total chicken shite when they encounter a gay guy who is willing to get into a fight

Actually you can Viking so hate to break your bubble. As far as homophobes being closeted cowards, there have been two studies which proved this. The first one, done by the university of Georgia, confirmed 80% of homophobes got aroused when looking at gay porn. The second study was just released this month.


As far as them being fugly, have you been paying attention to the homophobes in the media? They're all extremely unattractive.

As far as them being dumb, the university if Florida proved the one main factor on how one voted on gay marriage was their education level.


As far as you being 100% straight, I take it you only watch lesbian porn and God knows you have never cum at the sight of another man cumming. There's a reason why its called the money shot.
well?
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
No I am seriously conflicted about that particular face type being used as some weird gay trope. Not all gays look that way, so the whole "gay face" thing grates even more me.

I will say that he reminds me of some other famous closet cases and "reformed" gays, facially.

See this is why i am of a few minds about him as an example.
Where did I say all gay men look like that???? Gay face means he is obviously gay.

You know there's a common link when the guys who are giving me the hardest time and can't seemingly comprehend what's what are the guys not showing face.
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
Ummmm...


Thats what I want to know...

Mike you say in your opening post:



We are providing you with homophobes, as per yer request.

Do I need to pull over yer posts in SC therad where ya flat out say that?




well?

Wtf is your problem? Funny how the only part you didn't highlight was where I said if he has a gay face he doesn't count and then go on and ask me how the obvious gay guys you are posting don't count.
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
You guys are trying to throw everything including the kitchen sink to see if something might stick.

Which part of if the guy is obviously gay then he does jot count escape either one of you. To attempt to come in here and post crap from another thread that has NOTHING to do with homophobes in the media not only makes you look desperate but it makes you look like a stalker too.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
You are missing the entire point here. Trying to debate with you is like trying to get a brick wall to start a conversation.

Are you normally like this or are you just trying to be a total dick to me whenever possible?

Which part of "gay face" escaped you? The point is if the guy is obviously gay then he does not count.
N the point is you said if he LOOKED obviously gay.I made the point that that is discriminatory (like when straight effeminate ids are bashed for being gay?) and that if the constituents are wiling to accept them as straight (when there ACTIONS are clearly not) then they should be treated as closeted, self-hating gays, which is YOUR very own fucking definition!

Now stop flippin' the fuck out on Conan, as right now YOU are the one being a dick.

You seem like you can be a nice enough guy, but your temper is short as hell, and you appear ready to jump on anyone who inadvertently pisses you off. I made the effort of looking through your posts to get a sense of you. you would do well to do the same.
 

ConanTheBarber

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Posts
5,306
Media
0
Likes
2,087
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
You are missing the entire point here.

I'm not sure you get your own points.

Are you normally like this or are you just trying to be a total dick to me whenever possible?

Maybe you could explain to me what was dickish about my post.
You don't exactly fail to nudge the DickMeter™ yourself.
You're oddly explosive, unpleasant, irrational.
I will avoid you, going forward.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
You are missing the entire point here. Trying to debate with you is like trying to get a brick wall to start a conversation.

Are you normally like this or are you just trying to be a total dick to me whenever possible?

Which part of "gay face" escaped you? The point is if the guy is obviously gay then he does not count.
Gay face (appearance) not, NOT personality, actions and such. But fine. What the hell Ever.
You guys are trying to throw everything including the kitchen sink to see if something might stick.

Which part of if the guy is obviously gay then he does jot count escape either one of you. To attempt to come in here and post crap from another thread that has NOTHING to do with homophobes in the media not only makes you look desperate from like a stalker too.

Yes logic would seem that way. I did it to show that YOU said a homophobe is a closeted gay gay By DEFINITION *yours I might add* they would all be gay faces,

You are acting like a raving douche bag of monumental proportions. I m so sorry you had it rough.
Lots of us have.
Tons of us have the scars to prove it.
Get over yourself, cuz right now u are being the words biggest free-standing douche.

I will recuse myself form this ridiculous, slanted thread, one in which the only answer that is right is YOURS. You will invalidate any suggesting that i contrary to YOUR proposed and predetermined fact.

Feel free to fuck off.
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
Gay face (appearance) not, NOT personality, actions and such. But fine. What the hell Ever.


Yes logic would seem that way. I did it to show that YOU said a homophobe is a closeted gay gay By DEFINITION *yours I might add* they would all be gay faces,

You are acting like a raving douche bag of monumental proportions. I m so sorry you had it rough.
Lots of us have.
Tons of us have the scars to prove it.
Get over yourself, cuz right now u are being the words biggest free-standing douche.

I will recuse myself form this ridiculous, slanted thread, one in which the only answer that is right is YOURS. You will invalidate any suggesting that i contrary to YOUR proposed and predetermined fact.

Feel free to fuck off.
Both of you are just simply amazing.

First off, the point of this thread was to highlight homophobes in the media and how they're generally not attractive. I made one simple sidenote, that if the guy was obviously gay then he didn't count.

So what do you do? You start hijacking the thread by posting well known closet cases and queens who look like a rejected Versace ad.

Odd how when someone can't abide by one simple rule they throw a tantrum and call the game over.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Both of you are just simply amazing.

First off, the point of this thread was to highlight homophobes in the media and how they're generally not attractive. I made one simple sidenote, that if the guy was obviously gay then he didn't count.

So what do you do? You start hijacking the thread by posting well known closet cases and queens who look like a rejected Versace ad.

Odd how when someone can't abide by one simple rule they throw a tantrum and call the game over.
:rolleyes:

have fun with your little thread.
 

nycmcmike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Posts
366
Media
0
Likes
1,392
Points
323
Location
New York City
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Male
Funny how Smaccoms didn't have any issue comprehending the point of this thread. He instead went to Google and posted two of the most recent homophobes he could find, neither of which have a gay face and are actually making headlines from some time besides last millennium.

Both of you are just trying to be bitter assholes with the only point you're trying to prove is that you enjoy being one.

How hard would it be for EITHER one of you to find a news article.from the past month which involved a homophobe so we could discuss it??? Instead you went out of your way to be argumentative by brining up the most inane people possible.

Yes I said find one good looking homophobe that wasn't obviously gay which you couldn't do. And in doing so you proved one of my points. You guys are arguing not every homophobe is gay nor are the fugly yet you can't produce one single good looking homophobe making headlines in this century.

Of course you're pissed. I would be too if I were full of it.

And Nico my friend that is your "fuck off" as requested
 

NoH8

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Posts
644
Media
1
Likes
225
Points
438
Location
Byron Bay (New South Wales, Australia)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
"Gay face." Never knew such a term existed.

Now, I can't say that every homophobe in media (or in general) is physically ugly.

However, their fucktarded hatred makes them utterly repulsive in my eyes, regardless of how they look.

Just my opinion.
Ditto.

If you think about attractive men in Hollywood, business, (not sure about US Politics) they know that homophobia is not part of the repertoire of an attractive or successful person these days. Except in the alternate universe of fundamentalist religion where I would nominate the President of Iran as possibly sexually attractive but otherwise repulsive. A hookup? I'd have to kill him afterwards.