Hopefully the definitive mandingo length analysis

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
When estimating penis length from female hands, the biggest issue is camera angle: the whole length of the penis must stay at the exact same distance from the camera, or the results will be dramatically skewed, especially when the reference is at either end of the penis.

Finding usable pictures is not easy, and even though I believe my method is reliable, there is still a lot of room for error in individual estimations, so the results will only get meaningful when I've done a good number of them.
I will do this little by little, so please bear with me.

hand breadth.PNG


Average female hand breadth: 74mm (according to Wikipedia)
My hand breadth: 91mm

I will assume that all female performers have average hand size, and that the same 74/91 ratio can be applied to all hand features.

For each picture I will put my hand in the exact same position as the girl on a similarly shaped graduated object, measure the distance between the two most relevant points, translate that measurement to average female, and deduce the penis length.

I'm completely open to constructive criticism of my methodology :)

-------------------------------

Pic 01

Cons: can't really tell whether the whole penis is at a consistent distance from camera; penis at a slight upward angle.

My hand: 70mm
Her hand: 56.9mm, 40px
Penis: 148px, 210.6mm (8.29")

Pic 01.jpg
 

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Pic 02

Cons: can't really tell whether the whole penis is at a consistent distance from camera; penis at a slight upward angle; hand position hard to reproduce accurately.

My hand: 76mm
Her hand: 61.8mm, 39px
Penis: 127px, 201.2mm (7.92")

Average of estimations so far: 8.11"

Pic 02.jpg
 

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Pic 03

Cons: can't really tell whether the whole penis is at a consistent distance from camera.

My hand: 45mm
Her hand: 36.6mm, 90px
Penis: 535px, 21.76mm (8.57")

Average of estimations so far: 8.26"

Pic 03.jpg
 

melk0r

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Posts
229
Media
18
Likes
1,150
Points
598
Location
Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Just curiuos here.
you have a huge cock, according from your online gallery.
you dont trust the claims of mandigos cocks to be real? even when you know huge cock are a real thing in this world? XD
You look like a 10 inch cock, those your pic analysis share accurate resoults on your lenght?
sorry for this poorly writting post, but english is not my first lenguage, and true be told i just enter the site for a quick jacking off XD
 

CannibalHolocaust

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Posts
72
Media
0
Likes
100
Points
28
Location
London
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
There is a more detailed analysis by Raul who came to a similar figure as yourself but using a different method, it is in Spanish though:

original.jpg

Taken from his other research here, Disqus Profile - disqus_CCTR5v85mC
 

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You dont trust the claims of mandigos cocks to be real? even when you know huge cock are a real thing in this world? XD

I'm just trying to advance the debate by providing the best evidence possible.

You look like a 10 inch cock, does your pic analysis share accurate results on your lenght?

This has nothing to do with my own size. I can foresee criticism because of it, but every skeptic will be able to redo the measurements and calculations for themselves. Selecting "neutral" pics is the hard part.
 

melk0r

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Posts
229
Media
18
Likes
1,150
Points
598
Location
Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm just trying to advance the debate by providing the best evidence possible.



This has nothing to do with my own size. I can foresee criticism because of it, but every skeptic will be able to redo the measurements and calculations for themselves. Selecting "neutral" pics is the hard part.
i was not cuestioning yout own size, i was asking if your method predict correctly your own size, that you well knonw. As a positive control.
I was just curious didn t mean to be rude.
 

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
  • Like
Reactions: Giovanni

sdp

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Posts
1,678
Media
757
Likes
43,890
Points
618
Location
Blue Ball, PA, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
i was not cuestioning yout own size, i was asking if your method predict correctly your own size, that you well knonw. As a positive control.

I experimented my methodology on my own pics, yes, but that's it. Visually I would put Mandingo at 8.75" - 9" NBP, i.e. noticeably longer than me at my "working" erection level (about 8.5") where it points straight out the way his does.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vikingking1000

longozzy

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Posts
1,926
Media
0
Likes
3,598
Points
343
Location
Alice Springs (Northern Territory, Australia)
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Can we not just email him and ask for a proper measurement pic?

I experimented my methodology on my own pics, yes, but that's it. Visually I would put Mandingo at 8.75" - 9" NBP, i.e. noticeably longer than me at my "working" erection level (about 8.5") where it points straight out the way his does.
 

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,768
Media
0
Likes
3,978
Points
208
Gender
Male
I will assume that all female performers have average hand size
I'd imagine that would give you a fairly "generous" estimation. The common denominator with monster dick porn performers seems to be that they're all pretty tiny (especially the females).

Take Care
 

fordonfire

Admired Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Posts
1,654
Media
0
Likes
978
Points
443
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I will assume that all female performers have average hand size, and that the same 74/91 ratio can be applied to all hand features.

hmm, i always assumed that most female performers were probably below average with respect to height, weight, hand size etc.

what exactly are the "two most relevant points"?
 

Jim22cm

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 19, 2004
Posts
545
Media
217
Likes
3,862
Points
598
Age
53
Location
Utrecht (Netherlands)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Average female hand breadth: 74mm (according to Wikipedia)
My hand breadth: 91mm

I will assume that all female performers have average hand size, and that the same 74/91 ratio can be applied to all hand features.

I thought men in porn are in general above average while girls in porn generally are petite and have small hands ...
There's an obvious reason for choosing tiny girls with small hands: they make the cocks look bigger ...