B_VinylBoy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Posts
- 10,363
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 68
- Points
- 123
- Location
- Boston, MA / New York, NY
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
This thread has become proof positive that you can lead a horse to water, but if it drinks its own piss instead there's nothing you can do but watch and shake your head in disbelief.
There's no probable way you can come to this conclusion based on some trivial nonsense on a message board about big dicks. So spare yourself from making more shrouded attacks on my intellect and start thinking like an adult.
And if you ask most lawyers, judges or politicians they would understand that a person having a right to an abortion and a right to choose to have one is essentially the same thing because WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE, YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEGIN WITH. And you have the gall to call people thickly skulled? How hard is it for you to comprehend that simple line of logic?
Beyond this, anyone can see through this legislation and see just how politically motivated it really is. Boehner claimed that his main focus while speaker would be to focus on the Economy and job creation. Meanwhile, the GOP has provided more legislation that challenges or tries to impede on a person's civil liberties instead and present them under the phony guise of "fiscal responsibility". The money that would be saved from passing this measure is insignificant to the amount of money necessary to properly address our wailing economy. Therefore, it is safe to say that this latest anti-Abortion bill is more pandering and GOP grandstanding to their far right, religious base in hopes that they run to the polls in 2012 to vote for them. On top of this, the bill affects women with low incomes who live in poor to bordering impoverished areas, especially in cities where people tend to vote Democrat. This is more proof that the passing of this bill has nothing to do with the Economy and all about winning elections. All this, and we haven't even began to discuss what will happen in the Senate. But since the GOP does not have a solid, filibuster proof majority, this legislation is already dead before it even breathes. That would bring the official trifecta of propagandizing BS to light.
And you want to sit here and demand that we acknowledge your fruitless and pathetic point about the wording of a law that would be interpreted as being the same thing if viewed through the minds of common sense and logic? You're not that deep or cryptic, so you can stop with this phony-ass "deep analysis" because it ain't fooling anybody.
You obviously have no experience whatsoever in legal terminology or wording.
There's no probable way you can come to this conclusion based on some trivial nonsense on a message board about big dicks. So spare yourself from making more shrouded attacks on my intellect and start thinking like an adult.
Lawyers, judges, politicians have to choose their words very carefully to convey a certain and specific meaning. So when there is disagreement they took at the carefully worded document and do as it is written.
And if you ask most lawyers, judges or politicians they would understand that a person having a right to an abortion and a right to choose to have one is essentially the same thing because WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE, YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEGIN WITH. And you have the gall to call people thickly skulled? How hard is it for you to comprehend that simple line of logic?
Beyond this, anyone can see through this legislation and see just how politically motivated it really is. Boehner claimed that his main focus while speaker would be to focus on the Economy and job creation. Meanwhile, the GOP has provided more legislation that challenges or tries to impede on a person's civil liberties instead and present them under the phony guise of "fiscal responsibility". The money that would be saved from passing this measure is insignificant to the amount of money necessary to properly address our wailing economy. Therefore, it is safe to say that this latest anti-Abortion bill is more pandering and GOP grandstanding to their far right, religious base in hopes that they run to the polls in 2012 to vote for them. On top of this, the bill affects women with low incomes who live in poor to bordering impoverished areas, especially in cities where people tend to vote Democrat. This is more proof that the passing of this bill has nothing to do with the Economy and all about winning elections. All this, and we haven't even began to discuss what will happen in the Senate. But since the GOP does not have a solid, filibuster proof majority, this legislation is already dead before it even breathes. That would bring the official trifecta of propagandizing BS to light.
And you want to sit here and demand that we acknowledge your fruitless and pathetic point about the wording of a law that would be interpreted as being the same thing if viewed through the minds of common sense and logic? You're not that deep or cryptic, so you can stop with this phony-ass "deep analysis" because it ain't fooling anybody.