- jonb,
Here's the formula:
L x [(2 x pi)x(sqrt<G divided by pi>)]
[(12 x f) + i]
Since a(bc)=abc, we can get rid of a lot of these parentheses.
Now, simplified, that becomes
index=length*2*PI*sqrt(girth/PI)/height
This formula is more universal, as well, as long as you use the same unit of measurement (inches or centimeters) for height as for penile measurements.
L x [(2 x pi)x(sqrt<G divided by pi>)]
[(12 x f) + i]
Since a(bc)=abc, we can get rid of a lot of these parentheses.
Now, simplified, that becomes
index=length*2*PI*sqrt(girth/PI)/height
This formula is more universal, as well, as long as you use the same unit of measurement (inches or centimeters) for height as for penile measurements.
cinoric: I'm going to call this entire enterprise into question.
The volume of a cylinder: length * pi radius^2.
---
Girth, in this case, refers to circumferance: 2 * radius * pi
Solve in terms of radius: radius = girth/2pi
---
Therefore the volume of a cylindrical penis is: length * pi * (girth/2pi)^2
or
(length * (girth^2)) / 4pi
---
Assuming we want larger penises to have larger numbers, the ratio should be penile-volume:height SO
(length * (girth^2)) / (4pi * height)
---
I cannot figure out the mathematical logic behind the previously listed formula.
First, it completely devalues girth by dividing it by pi and then taking the square root of that quotient.
A modest girth of five inches: sqrt(5/3.14) = 1.25
A staggeringly massive girth of twelve inches: sqrt(12/3.14) = 1.95
A difference of .7 in the final product.
Second, it massively overstates length by doubling it and then multiplying it by pi.
A modest length of five and a half inches: 5.5*2*3.14 = 34.5
An equally modest length of six inches: 6*2*3.14 = 37.7
A difference of 3.2 in the final product.
---
Thus, assume two men each 5'11 (71 inches).
One has a penis 8 inches long and 8 inches in girth. His number by the old formula: 1.13
The other's penis is 9 inches long and 6 inches in girth. His number: 1.10
The first (suspiciously cylindrical) penis has a volume of roughly 40 cubic inches.
The second is only 26 cubic inches in bulk.
.
Length matters, but if you saw these two members next to one another...
...it would be VERY obvious which one was "BIG"ger.
.03 wouldn't do the first man justice..
My volume based formula, however, seems to overstate the point a little... rating the two men at .56 and .37 respectively. The average volume/height, on the other hand, a man 5'10(average) with a penis 6.5 inches long and 5 inches in circumference (based on this rather forgiving online survey), gets the number .18.
Sadly, this system doesn't really give give height differences as much credit as they're due. Judging the size of a man based only on his height is pretty innacurate anyway. Ideally we'd multiply that by his width at the shoulders to get a slightly more realistic number. Many penises aren't strictly cylindrical either. So it goes.
Critique as you see fit.
This whole thread has gotten very silly.
The volume of a cylinder: length * pi radius^2.
---
Girth, in this case, refers to circumferance: 2 * radius * pi
Solve in terms of radius: radius = girth/2pi
---
Therefore the volume of a cylindrical penis is: length * pi * (girth/2pi)^2
or
(length * (girth^2)) / 4pi
---
Assuming we want larger penises to have larger numbers, the ratio should be penile-volume:height SO
(length * (girth^2)) / (4pi * height)
---
I cannot figure out the mathematical logic behind the previously listed formula.
First, it completely devalues girth by dividing it by pi and then taking the square root of that quotient.
A modest girth of five inches: sqrt(5/3.14) = 1.25
A staggeringly massive girth of twelve inches: sqrt(12/3.14) = 1.95
A difference of .7 in the final product.
Second, it massively overstates length by doubling it and then multiplying it by pi.
A modest length of five and a half inches: 5.5*2*3.14 = 34.5
An equally modest length of six inches: 6*2*3.14 = 37.7
A difference of 3.2 in the final product.
---
Thus, assume two men each 5'11 (71 inches).
One has a penis 8 inches long and 8 inches in girth. His number by the old formula: 1.13
The other's penis is 9 inches long and 6 inches in girth. His number: 1.10
The first (suspiciously cylindrical) penis has a volume of roughly 40 cubic inches.
The second is only 26 cubic inches in bulk.
.
Length matters, but if you saw these two members next to one another...
...it would be VERY obvious which one was "BIG"ger.
.03 wouldn't do the first man justice..
My volume based formula, however, seems to overstate the point a little... rating the two men at .56 and .37 respectively. The average volume/height, on the other hand, a man 5'10(average) with a penis 6.5 inches long and 5 inches in circumference (based on this rather forgiving online survey), gets the number .18.
Sadly, this system doesn't really give give height differences as much credit as they're due. Judging the size of a man based only on his height is pretty innacurate anyway. Ideally we'd multiply that by his width at the shoulders to get a slightly more realistic number. Many penises aren't strictly cylindrical either. So it goes.
Critique as you see fit.
This whole thread has gotten very silly.
7x6andchg: Well of course it is getting silly...but then again the coffee can and water displacement technique didn't work too well for some....
AnonyMs: okay I have an idea.
Let's all agree to meet in person. A panel of judges composed of women board posters will view each one of you individually and come to a consensus as to whether you are big, mostly big, or HUGE!
I volunteer to do the actual measuring....
Let's all agree to meet in person. A panel of judges composed of women board posters will view each one of you individually and come to a consensus as to whether you are big, mostly big, or HUGE!
I volunteer to do the actual measuring....
sammygirly: Um, yeah...I'd be willing to sacrifice and be on this panel....I'll um, verify her measurements. ;D
BIGBOYDAVE: [quote author=AnonyMs link=board=sex;num=1043144584;start=45#49 date=02/19/03 at 11:56:33]okay I have an idea.
Let's all agree to meet in person. A panel of judges composed of women board posters will view each one of you individually and come to a consensus as to whether you are big, mostly big, or HUGE!
I volunteer to do the actual measuring....[/quote]
Maby You Girls Should Organize A convention. Be Interesting to see how many would show and maby all different Cities and Countries could via for the privalage of Hosting it Like the Olimpics you could organize a pannel to go to all the cities to check out the Qualifacations
Let's all agree to meet in person. A panel of judges composed of women board posters will view each one of you individually and come to a consensus as to whether you are big, mostly big, or HUGE!
I volunteer to do the actual measuring....[/quote]
Maby You Girls Should Organize A convention. Be Interesting to see how many would show and maby all different Cities and Countries could via for the privalage of Hosting it Like the Olimpics you could organize a pannel to go to all the cities to check out the Qualifacations
aussiechick63:
I also am willing to sacrifice my time, with I'm sure much hardship, and be a judge in a contest such as this.
It won't be easy but I'm sure if us girls stick together we can get through this for the guys in here.
I also am willing to sacrifice my time, with I'm sure much hardship, and be a judge in a contest such as this.
It won't be easy but I'm sure if us girls stick together we can get through this for the guys in here.
chicago_girl: I'll be more than willing to give my valuable time and and help out. That would be alot of measuring and I'm sure Anonyms could use some help.
FunGirl: One more volunteer here, to you know, help out with all that measuring and everything...
HotCock007: Thank God all you gals understand! I didnt realise the mathematical depths the other guys would go to! All we were interested in was opinions, not how to calculate the speed of light based upon gravitational forces related to the penis when emerced in water! LOL!!!!!! All we wanted to know was what people consider to be big and how they have arrived at thier conclusion!
