How big should you be to be an underwear model

weldbend

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
26
Media
3
Likes
3
Points
38
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
How big do you think you have to be to be an underwear model?
I was just wondering, you can compare my pic if you want
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
126
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
How big do you think you have to be to be an underwear model?

I was just wondering, you can compare my pic if you want
Having a large endowment is not necessarily a requirement for being an underwear model,
though having a fit hot body generally is.

It's not at all uncommon for briefs to be stuffed. Things are often not what they appear. :wink:
 
Last edited:

canuck_pa

Admired Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Posts
2,459
Media
0
Likes
800
Points
333
Location
Beautiful Vancouver Canada
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
In a previous life I used to retouch underwear photos. If the model was big I sometimes had to smooth out the bulge so it wasn't too noticeable. Also had to retouch out VPL and sometimes hair. Needless to say I always asked for extra prints of the bigger bulges (just incase I had to redo them).
 

LeeEJ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Posts
1,444
Media
2
Likes
26
Points
268
Location
DC
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'd say, not very big, just like most models of women's clothing don't have huge boobs. The manufacturer (usually) wants to highlight the clothing, not the body parts.

Of course, it would make for an interesting icebreaker at the bar -- "I've got the body to be an underwear model, but they said my cock was too big..." :D
 

mitc3117

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Posts
463
Media
23
Likes
112
Points
188
Location
West Coast
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Exactly. If they zoomed in all the way to just that part of me, I'd be set. But I haven't had a six pack in a couple years (Back since Lacrosse in College) so my current extremely mediocre build wouldn't make the cut.
 

alx

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
1,024
Media
0
Likes
63
Points
73
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Plus if you were big, you would pack out 95% of underwear brands. I think having the ripped body is more important to their advertisements .
 

arthur

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Posts
600
Media
5
Likes
38
Points
163
Age
55
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
It's not about the cock. Most of the time they would like a 'smaller' model so as not to intimidate the buyer. As most have said already. It's not about the cock it's about the stomach muscles above them...
 

catman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Posts
2,413
Media
0
Likes
370
Points
208
Location
Ga
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
what does how tall you are have to do with....

oh wait....got it.

I would think smaller would be okay....less airbrushing...
 
D

deleted3782

Guest
I always thought a big wang would sell more underwear. Guys want to feel like their underwear makes objects appear larger than they are...
 

cjj2k

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Posts
312
Media
2
Likes
67
Points
173
Location
KY, USA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
over 4 feet? I'm guessing the closer to 6 feet the better.


Shorter men make better models.... tall women, short men.... just looks better on camera. Plus the shorter u are, the easier it is to look ripped becuase your muscles are short, so they bulk up faster. If youre tall... its more work.

Besides look at porn, you see a man thats hung.... it hangs halfway down thigh! But he is only 5'3" the same penis would look very small on someone who was say 6'3".... just saying.
 

ebutuoy28

Cherished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Posts
342
Media
4
Likes
327
Points
128
Location
UK
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I always thought a big wang would sell more underwear. Guys want to feel like their underwear makes objects appear larger than they are...


Agree - and some goes for jeans advertising - you notice the brand that makes the bulge look the best
 

bendigoboi

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
677
Media
4
Likes
89
Points
248
Location
Bendigo, Australia
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
It depends on who you want to model for.

Jockstrap Central (based in Toronto) use a wide variety of models, as you will see from their site.

They also have some tips on what they look for - confidence with getting your kit off and a good sized "package" (esp balls) seem to be significant:

Jockstrap Central - jockstrap galleries

Good Luck if you give it a go!
 

simbablk

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Posts
2,271
Media
26
Likes
4,206
Points
368
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I would imagine they wouldn't want you to have a really large dick to be an underwear model. In fact, they might have to photoshop it to make it look smaller if it's too "obscene".

I think they're mainly focused on the body itself - the pecs, abs, and thighs. And of course, kinda good looking.

Simba
 

lib0

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Posts
43
Media
0
Likes
25
Points
43
Location
Sunny Cali
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Plus if you were big, you would pack out 95% of underwear brands. I think having the ripped body is more important to their advertisements .

Before my dad went to college he tried to be an underwear model. He was involved in every sport imaginable and had an amazing body and a huge cock - his balls are the biggest I've ever seen. He did a couple of shoots and his problem was that he packed out the underwear too much, short lived career.
 

drabman

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Posts
509
Media
0
Likes
109
Points
78
Location
UK
Gender
Male
...Besides look at porn, you see a man thats hung.... it hangs halfway down thigh! But he is only 5'3" the same penis would look very small on someone who was say 6'3".... just saying.

Absolutely. In fact many of the monster cock porn stars are short - some very short. For example Mandingo claims to be 5'6, which I suspect is actually being a bit economical with the truth. If you find a shot where he's standing next to a female porn star, who claims to be shorter than that, he's often the same height. Richard Mann is the same - really look closely at his height compared with co-stars, doorways etc, you'll see he's REALLY short. His d*ck would look nowhere near as big on a tall guy.