how cylindrical are you?

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by fnarg, Sep 16, 2006.

  1. fnarg

    fnarg New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Adelaide Australia
    OK, so I was looking around, and it seems to me that most people have fairly cylindrical cocks, ie same width from the top as with the side. How about you guys? How is the width from above compared to the side? And ladies, what do you prefer?

    Myself, I am quite a bit wider from above. About 2 inches arcoss from the top (3 fingers wide, attached) while only 1 from above - 6 is my total girth (7 long). Knowing that, I was wondering how normal it is to be so different one side to another.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. PowayWolfman

    PowayWolfman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Messages:
    739
    Albums:
    9
    Likes Received:
    260
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    poway
    my dicks a bit more oval.. two and a half top and bottom, two fingers on the sides... yet im only 5.5 thick.. Its funneh because people SWEAR im 6 around.. but a tape measure dosnt lie :)
     
  3. Nitrofiend

    Nitrofiend New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Very interesting question actually, I was wondering about this. I too am 7" long, 2" across on top by about 1.5" on the side and I was actually wondering if this is odd. My gf who's seen about 30 or so erect penises remarks that she's seen more circular, and weirder shapes, etc. but she gets the most out of one that is a bit more oval because it stretches her in a better way to add friction to her clitoris. That's what she told me anyway.
     
  4. Pecker

    Pecker Retired Moderator
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Messages:
    83,922
    Likes Received:
    34
    Leave it to me to be the odd guy out. My shaft has got a large girth, 7-7¼" but it is actually wider from a side view than from the top view. It's due to a very prominent corpus spongiosum, I'm sure.
     
  5. udubcrew

    udubcrew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    286
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    387
    Gender:
    Male
    side to side is about twice what top to bottom is.
     
  6. roosevelt

    roosevelt New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Roughly the same cross section as my wrist
     
  7. D_Coyne Toss

    D_Coyne Toss New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    12
    From above i am slightly under 2.5 inches.
     
  8. Max

    Max New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    I'd never thought much about this before. I think I fall into both categories. Wider across (seen from above) than from the side, until you get to the last three or so inches near the base, where the urethral bulge on the underside makes it deeper than it is wide.
     
  9. kurios

    kurios Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Very cylindrical at 5.5 circumference.

    If any change I would want to be more oval.

    A few of my friends over the years have at some point referred to their measurements, specifically girth being a similar 5.5 and from having seen them previously I would have thought they were considerably thicker.
    I guess Im saying oval looks thicker
     
  10. D_Bob_Crotchitch

    D_Bob_Crotchitch New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,498
    Likes Received:
    18
    Mine is about the same size and shape as my wrist too. I can wear my watch on it. Now, if I only had a larger wrist :tongue:
     
  11. roosevelt

    roosevelt New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    yeah, I've got a picture of my dick wearing my watch in my gallery...

    My wrist isn't huge, but it's proportional to my body at 6'2 and 210 lbs
     
  12. fortiesfun

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,692
    Likes Received:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Like Pecker, I am more cylindrical than oval, tending a bit toward a deep side view.

    Roosevelt's watch pic is a hoot, by the way. It has long been a favorite. Now if we could get the wide-angle version of that one...
     
  13. roosevelt

    roosevelt New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    check my gallery forties... ask and you shall recieve (no watch though)
     
  14. B_dxjnorto

    B_dxjnorto New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    7,319
    Likes Received:
    21
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Southwest U.S.
    My hard-on is oval. Two inches wide, an inch and a half in the other (side) dimension. I don't have a big corpus spongiosum like Pecker and others. There's a guy on here goes by bull something who has a huge corpus spongiosum. (The corpus spongiosum surrounds the urethra and makes up the glans and your penis bulb down there below your scrotum when you're hard.)

    It seems like more people would have oval erections because there are two erectile chambers side by side in the body of the penis, the corpora cavernosa (plural). But, I've seen more rounder hard-ons than oval hard-ons, probably because the third chamber, the aforementioned corpus spongiosum rounds it out in most men.

    The variations in size of these three erectile chambers make all the variations in penis sizes and shapes.
     
  15. scanjock8

    scanjock8 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    461
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    112
    cylindrical my tool's best feature (or so i've always thought)
     
  16. Ionto

    Ionto New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Paris
    Much more oval than cylindrical here.

    And this post has made me notice that I"m closer to cylindrical when soft and very much a wide but not deep shape (if that makes sense) when hard. Any other oval shaped ones notice this too?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted