How do women like cut cocks.. If you don't...
- Thread starter vexx
- Start date
I voted for my own which is tight as a drum. I don't know if it's exactly that tight but it's pretty tight. I dunno if anyone else has got remarks, in bed, in the past like "your hard cock, your fat cut cock, your tight cut cock, etc. I didn't think much of it but it grew on me. Because of some of the conversations I ventured to have with girls it became like something of a status(to a lesser extent of course) symbol. One Ex and I talk about it at some length one night and I got the strong impression (rightly or wrongly) (that it was something not only more or less expected but strongly preferred in it's own right). It depends on the region and the people but it made me grateful(whether how right or wrong that emotion may be.
I personally prefer Circumcised cock, but honestly couldn't tell what the differences were in how it was done and didn't realise there was such variety. My ex was cut and it took a while to get used to but now I much prefer it. When i get one that isn't cut, it flummoxes me for a while 
There's always fans of surgically modified penes it seems. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why the foreskin glides and why this may be more inviting, especially for the partners of endowed men.
oh don't you start! :tongue:
i happen to agree with you, and i found this thread irritating in it's complete dismissal of the uncut preference, but the last thing this place needs is yet another of those threads.
I've never had any complaints, and I'm uncut. I understand some guys can't retract their foreskin, which I think would probably be pretty uncomfortable and might interfere with sex, but mine slips all the way back with no problem. I think of it as having the best of both worlds. I can leave my skin forward and glide, or I can pull it back and get that friction directly on my head.
Hi Dolf. They are all those threads until people change. And it's really not a problem most places. We only find infant circumcision championed in places where there's already a major population of cut adult men. So we just have to let people know there is no urgency to make such a strange decision at birth, and the number of cut adults will fall off and U.S. hospitals will find their stocks of circ devices going unused and so on. It's going to take a few generations and unfortunately there's probably always going to be fundies and nutbags, but for the most part infant genital cutting will be relegated to the dustbin of history where it belongs.
An ex-gf of mine told me that she felt a difference between cut vs uncut. Apparentely uncut (like myself) glides inside her, she said that she could feel my foreskin sliding on/off my head inside her...and it made her orgasm quicker
yeah. if i was to prefer anything in the cut range it would be the loosest cut possible.
the only high & tight bf i ever had just made me raw and sore after a couple of hours. i think it's the sliding of the skin that prevents me getting sore.
So is the natural vagina by the reasoning of the so called studies. You're right, don't start until you educate yourself more fully. Circ has always been the "cure" for the incurable disease of the day. Check out syphilis vis a vis circ circa 19th century.
Last edited:
Incocknito
Sexy Member
Foreskin FTW!
When is surgery ever better than the "real thing"?
Are fake tits better than real ones? Are surgically corrected eyes better than 100% working natural eyes? Are hair implants better than natural hair growth?
No. And circumcised cocks are not better than natural cocks. Uncut have increased functionality.
And hsarge: Uncut does not automatically mean anyone will contract AIDS, numb nuts. Even cut men get AIDS! Nothing will stop AIDS except condoms which are not related to a man's circ status.
I hate all these excuses people come up with for circumcised cocks. The bottom line is there are no gains; there is only the loss of the foreskin.
When is surgery ever better than the "real thing"?
Are fake tits better than real ones? Are surgically corrected eyes better than 100% working natural eyes? Are hair implants better than natural hair growth?
No. And circumcised cocks are not better than natural cocks. Uncut have increased functionality.
And hsarge: Uncut does not automatically mean anyone will contract AIDS, numb nuts. Even cut men get AIDS! Nothing will stop AIDS except condoms which are not related to a man's circ status.
I hate all these excuses people come up with for circumcised cocks. The bottom line is there are no gains; there is only the loss of the foreskin.
InCockNito....You said it perfectly. I am cut, wish I wasn't though. Natural could only be better...more sensitivity, no need for lube...etc.etc. Not to mention, uncut cocks are stunning to look at. Never sucked or played with one, but would love too. I want my foreskin back, nobody asked me, they just took it.
Dx, you are right about the vagina. That is why, AIDS is so dominant among women. I'm not a proponent of cutting. But, if it can slow the AIDS infection rate, it should be considered. We in the developed world have a lesser chance of infection and a better chance of treatment. Others don't. I don't wish to sound dogmatic. I'm not
Sarge, if I could find truth in your comments I would point it out. The U.S. has the highest rate of AIDS among first world nations and most men of the age of sexual maturity are already cut.
We don't cut mucosal tissue from female neonates in the U.S. and we shouldn't start. Unless the mother is infected, an infant's chance of contracting the HIV virus is absolute zero.
What about the fact that men that are cut are more likely to not to want to use condoms. Loss of sensitivity due to circumcision is exacerbated by the presence of the condom. Intact guys can still experience the gliding motion. This makes the use of condoms less of a detractor for intact men. Condom use is definitely a more effective protection method then circumcision.
I don't think circumcision lowers the rate for "donators". The debated theory is that a circumcised man is less likely to contract HIV. If a circumcised man has HIV and doesn't use protection it is just as likely that he will transmit it to his partner as with an intact man. Perhaps there is even a greater chance if there is not adequate lubrication - greater chance of abrasion.
Similar threads
