How do you define your sexuality?

whatireallywant

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Posts
3,535
Media
0
Likes
30
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
I've sometimes wondered if my percentages should be 99/1 rather than 100/0.

But I'm 100/0 at this time in my life, so that's what I put. I was a bit bi-curious when I was in my late teens and early-mid twenties, but never acted on it. Now I have no desire that way. I find pussies ugly. I LOVE cocks. (I don't mind looking at women's breasts, though, although I don't get sexually aroused by them - I don't think...)

Gender identity is a trickier thing for me. I am an arguably 100% straight (in orientation) female, who looks like a woman, dresses like a woman and likes fashion and beauty - yet nearly every one of my other interests throughout life have been traditionally male! (well, and some neutral things like music and travel... which became my main interests - possibly because I wasn't put down for having those interests like I was for most of my other interests). I think my experiences with this helped me in growing up to not be homophobic (since I was raised in a VERY homophobic community, and most of my family are fundamentalist Christians.)
 

hot-rod

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
May 9, 2006
Posts
2,273
Media
0
Likes
1,280
Points
583
Location
Austin, Texas, US
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
For me it's quite simple, because I'm the total opposite of you. I love to watch a well built man and i have a bf. That would make me 100% gay, but I'm not really enthused when seeing a cock (was it gramatically right?). It will take time till i try the "real gay" anal sex, which could lessen the percentage to 90 or something.
But women are just persons to have non-sexual fun with, for me. I can't imagine to have sex with a woman, so again 100% gay.

As I said, it's simple for me.
Ditto! I'm 100% queer, I prefer men only :love:
 

Equine74

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Posts
46
Media
6
Likes
15
Points
228
Location
London
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I put 90% gay. My adult experiences have been 100% gay but I can't discount the straight stuff that I did in my teens.
I never fantasise about women and never get "crushes" on them, the way that I occasionally do with men. But, all the same, should the opportunity present itself (although I can't imagine how it would), I wouldn't say no to having sex with a woman again.
So I guess I'm 10% straight on principle.
 

B_Think_Kink

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Posts
10,419
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Gender
Female
I put 90% gay. My adult experiences have been 100% gay but I can't discount the straight stuff that I did in my teens.
I never fantasise about women and never get "crushes" on them, the way that I occasionally do with men. But, all the same, should the opportunity present itself (although I can't imagine how it would), I wouldn't say no to having sex with a woman again.
So I guess I'm 10% straight on principle.
Hey how you doing :p
 

D_Pubert Stabbingpain

Account Disabled
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Posts
2,116
Media
0
Likes
95
Points
183
I put 90% gay. My adult experiences have been 100% gay but I can't discount the straight stuff that I did in my teens.
I never fantasise about women and never get "crushes" on them, the way that I occasionally do with men. But, all the same, should the opportunity present itself (although I can't imagine how it would), I wouldn't say no to having sex with a woman again.
So I guess I'm 10% straight on principle.

Interesting perspective. :smile:
 

B_becominghorse

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Posts
1,111
Media
0
Likes
31
Points
183
Location
new york city
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
When you join this site we are all asked about are sexual preference. I said that I'm 90% straight and 10% gay but how do you really judge how straight or gay you are?

I chose 90% straight because I always think about women, look at them when I walk past and want to get married etc. The gay part of me however is probably different to a lot of people. I don't find men physically attractive and I could never have a romantic relationship with another man. I have never kissed a man either and I feel awkward if I ever have to hug another man. However, I love cock. I'm not massively keen on penetration (it can be great sometimes though) but I love to suck on a big hard dick and then swallow the cum. If someone I knew walked into my bedroom right now with their cock out, I would want it inside of me.

So how do the rest of you judge your sexual preference?

That's interesting and cool. I don't think about women as often as I used to, by now almost exclusively cock. I'd describe my sexuality as bestial-homosexual. Lots of hot workouts with guys with emphasis on basket and ass mostly, occasionally some kissing if the other guy is not very hung. totally into masculine smells.
 

D_Coyne Toss

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Posts
1,750
Media
0
Likes
176
Points
193
I define myself as 100% straight because I have sexual and romantic intrest just towards women.

I do like comparing and seeing "how I measure up compared to the others" but I have never felt sexual attraction for a guy, not even a jerk off buddy.

The idea of masturbating a jerk off buddy, or to have any kind of physical contact with him, for example, does not turn me on at all.
 

FuzzyKen

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
2,045
Media
0
Likes
97
Points
193
Gender
Male
What bothers me about this one is that I find myself unhappy regarding classifications to begin with.

I have always believed that there is no such thing as 100% anything. Males and females both have the ability to participate in sex acts if they become sexually aroused by another person and gender is not really the determining factor.

The right female could sexually attract and seduce a man identifying as gay and the right male could sexually attract and seduce a man identifying as straight.

In our lifetimes we may never meet that same or opposite sex individual that would with little hesitation cause us to make this kind of decision, the idea here would be exposure.

For these reasons I don't think that sexual orientation should be based on a sex act, but, by the ability to emotionally commit to an idividual.

I have, in my 55 years, had a great deal of heterosexual intercourse, yet was unable to find a female with whom I could emotionally bond. It took me many years to find a male with whom I could bond, but in that area I was eventually successful.

I identify more with the "gay" orientation simply because of my ability to bond with another male and not because of a sex act.

When it comes to relationships the idea is who you can bond to and share your life with over an extended period of time.

Doing this and judging this way makes a number assessment more a case of "chance meeting" than absolute statistical analysis.

Food for thought.........
 

D_Pubert Stabbingpain

Account Disabled
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Posts
2,116
Media
0
Likes
95
Points
183
What bothers me about this one is that I find myself unhappy regarding classifications to begin with.

I have always believed that there is no such thing as 100% anything. Males and females both have the ability to participate in sex acts if they become sexually aroused by another person and gender is not really the determining factor.

The right female could sexually attract and seduce a man identifying as gay and the right male could sexually attract and seduce a man identifying as straight.

In our lifetimes we may never meet that same or opposite sex individual that would with little hesitation cause us to make this kind of decision, the idea here would be exposure.

For these reasons I don't think that sexual orientation should be based on a sex act, but, by the ability to emotionally commit to an idividual.

I have, in my 55 years, had a great deal of heterosexual intercourse, yet was unable to find a female with whom I could emotionally bond. It took me many years to find a male with whom I could bond, but in that area I was eventually successful.

I identify more with the "gay" orientation simply because of my ability to bond with another male and not because of a sex act.

When it comes to relationships the idea is who you can bond to and share your life with over an extended period of time.

Doing this and judging this way makes a number assessment more a case of "chance meeting" than absolute statistical analysis.

Food for thought.........

I think you are on target with this FuzzyKen. With me though, it seems I more easily bond with women however, I know in my gut that I desperately need the same with a man. There are other personal issues that draw me to seek out a male mate as well. But certainly, I too have had many relationships with both genders and I agree that it matters most where your mind is instead of where your cock is! :biggrin1:

Just 1 slight point of disagreement and it has to do with your choice of the word "seduce," especially as you use it with the phrase "sexually attract." I think these are mutually exclusive. IOW, anyone can be seduced without being sexually attracted to the person who is seducing them. Think about that for a second. Especially with men, any physical contact will often produce the desire to fuck. You don't really have to be attracted to the person giving you the contact. Make sense?

An extreme example is that a man can be raped by a woman, maintain a full hardon erection, precum like crazy and ejaculate like a horse yet have no desire whatsoever to engage in sex with her. This is also why many women feel quilty when raped if they reached orgasm. Our bodies respond to touch often without our minds participating.

Now, all I need to do is find that right dude to share my life with. :wink:
 

numberseven

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Posts
101
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
101
Gender
Male
I chose 70/30 (straight) because I romantically significantly prefer women, but don't really draw lines on a sexual axis. Attractive people are attractive people, and if I find you attractive, there's a good chance I'll hint around a bit. I felt it was unfair to choose 50/50 because of that... so I split the difference.