How heavy is your cock?

1

13788

Guest
cegro27: Is it heavy enough that you can easily feel the pull of gravity on it or not? When it's semi-erect/fully erect, does it bounce around quite a bit when you walk?
 
1

13788

Guest
huge: I don't think my penis is heavy enough to feel gravity. To answer your second question, yes, when my penis is semi-hard, it does bounce when I am walking.
 
1

13788

Guest
3XL: Actually, mine's massive enough to generate it's own gravational field.

Geesh, what kind of a question is that?
 

Pecker

Retired Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Posts
54,502
Media
0
Likes
322
Points
283
I never thought much about its effect on gravity until the day I was on a scout troop hike. It seems that the scoutmaster took out his mapping paraphernalia to verify our route while the rest of us took a leak at the side of the trail.

When I whipped my dick out, the scoutmaster's compass went haywire. :unsure:
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
Originally posted by 3XL@Nov 4 2004, 03:23 PM
Actually, mine's massive enough to generate it's own gravational field.

Geesh, what kind of a question is that?
[post=262413]Quoted post[/post]​
Actually, all matter does; it just happens it's generally a very small gravitational field compared to a planet.
 
1

13788

Guest
3XL:
Originally posted by jonb+Nov 5 2004, 01:03 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jonb &#064; Nov 5 2004, 01:03 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-3XL@Nov 4 2004, 03:23 PM
Actually, mine&#39;s massive enough to generate it&#39;s own gravational field.

Geesh, what kind of a question is that?
[post=262413]Quoted post[/post]​
Actually, all matter does; it just happens it&#39;s generally a very small gravitational field compared to a planet.
[post=262426]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

:angry: Well yes of course&#33;
But correct me if I&#39;m wrong, I think that a 290 lb man generates a field too small for our instruments to measure... certainly it&#39;s too small for us to naturally perceive without instruments. And I suspect my cock is something less than my full body weight too.

ooops sorry I used pounds, and that&#39;s not truely a unit of mass is it? Pounds are actually a unit of force. But given we are talking about earth&#39;s gravity well at sea level, 290 pounds of force is generated by 638 Kg of mass.

oh oh... I forgot to use the right significant figures in my calculation&#33; Since I wrote "290" instead of "290." you&#39;d have to conclude from reading my paper, that the last zero is not significant, and therefore I am reduced to 2 significant figures leaving me at 640 Kg. <_<

So if anything, I&#39;ve proved that if you have to explain a joke, it wasn&#39;t funny :lol: &#33;
 

stu

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Posts
65
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
153
Age
43
Location
Melbourne (Aus)
Originally posted by 3XL+Nov 5 2004, 01:02 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(3XL &#064; Nov 5 2004, 01:02 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by jonb@Nov 5 2004, 01:03 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-3XL
@Nov 4 2004, 03:23 PM
Actually, mine&#39;s massive enough to generate it&#39;s own gravational field.

Geesh, what kind of a question is that?
[post=262413]Quoted post[/post]​

Actually, all matter does; it just happens it&#39;s generally a very small gravitational field compared to a planet.
[post=262426]Quoted post[/post]​

:angry: Well yes of course&#33;
But correct me if I&#39;m wrong, I think that a 290 lb man generates a field too small for our instruments to measure... certainly it&#39;s too small for us to naturally perceive without instruments. And I suspect my cock is something less than my full body weight too.

ooops sorry I used pounds, and that&#39;s not truely a unit of mass is it? Pounds are actually a unit of force. But given we are talking about earth&#39;s gravity well at sea level, 290 pounds of force is generated by 638 Kg of mass.

oh oh... I forgot to use the right significant figures in my calculation&#33; Since I wrote "290" instead of "290." you&#39;d have to conclude from reading my paper, that the last zero is not significant, and therefore I am reduced to 2 significant figures leaving me at 640 Kg. <_<

So if anything, I&#39;ve proved that if you have to explain a joke, it wasn&#39;t funny :lol: &#33;
[post=262443]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

*walk&#39;s away from the computer confused.*
 
1

13788

Guest
cegro27:
Originally posted by 3XL@Nov 4 2004, 10:02 PM
:angry: Well yes of course&#33;
But correct me if I&#39;m wrong, I think that a 290 lb man generates a field too small for our instruments to measure... certainly it&#39;s too small for us to naturally perceive without instruments. And I suspect my cock is something less than my full body weight too.

ooops sorry I used pounds, and that&#39;s not truely a unit of mass is it? Pounds are actually a unit of force. But given we are talking about earth&#39;s gravity well at sea level, 290 pounds of force is generated by 638 Kg of mass.

oh oh... I forgot to use the right significant figures in my calculation&#33; Since I wrote "290" instead of "290." you&#39;d have to conclude from reading my paper, that the last zero is not significant, and therefore I am reduced to 2 significant figures leaving me at 640 Kg. <_<

So if anything, I&#39;ve proved that if you have to explain a joke, it wasn&#39;t funny :lol: &#33;
[post=262443]Quoted post[/post]​

Well you&#39;re right 3XL, the (joke?) was definitely not funny... <_<
 
1

13788

Guest
3XL:
Originally posted by jonb@Nov 6 2004, 01:29 AM
Err. . . . No. At 9.8 m/s^2, 130 kg produces approximately 290 pounds of force, or 1.3 kilonewtons
[post=262617]Quoted post[/post]​


Wups&#33; you are right, my constant was inverted&#33;

Where is the egg on the face icon?
 

EDDIEUK

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Location
nyc
Gender
Male
Originally posted by 3XL+Nov 5 2004, 09:32 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(3XL &#064; Nov 5 2004, 09:32 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-jonb@Nov 6 2004, 01:29 AM
Err. . . . No. At 9.8 m/s^2, 130 kg produces approximately 290 pounds of force, or 1.3 kilonewtons
[post=262617]Quoted post[/post]​


Wups&#33; you are right, my constant was inverted&#33;

Where is the egg on the face icon?
[post=262618]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]
 

EDDIEUK

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Location
nyc
Gender
Male
Originally posted by EDDIEUK+Nov 5 2004, 11:16 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(EDDIEUK &#064; Nov 5 2004, 11:16 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by 3XL@Nov 5 2004, 09:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-jonb
@Nov 6 2004, 01:29 AM
Err. . . . No. At 9.8 m/s^2, 130 kg produces approximately 290 pounds of force, or 1.3 kilonewtons
[post=262617]Quoted post[/post]​



Wups&#33; you are right, my constant was inverted&#33;

Where is the egg on the face icon?
[post=262618]Quoted post[/post]​
[post=262625]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Glad to see there are other scientists here. Both of you realize that String Theory will change all these calculations slightly.
 

Bluespeedoz

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Posts
106
Media
10
Likes
125
Points
173
Age
45
Hi

Yes my bundle moves from side to side when I&#39;m walking / running / jumping etc. I&#39;m not sure how to weigh my toolbox but chicks do gravitate towards it&#33; I didn&#39;t get the joke?

-_-
 

malito

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Posts
1,677
Media
0
Likes
224
Points
283
Age
74
Location
Victoria (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
All kidding aside, I have thought about this and come to the conclusion that we first need a standard to which we can compare the weight to. Why don&#39;t we use the standard battery as our comparison? For instance in the flaccid state my little guy is about as heavy as a AAA battery. At that size, no I do not feel it during the day. At that size, yes it bounces on top of my right nut.
 

longbabysarm

1st Like
Joined
Jul 9, 2004
Posts
2
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
223
Age
61
When I was growing up I went to a private boarding school for boys. I had only just starting reaching puberty when I went there and was very confused and naive. The school nurse, who was studying to become a priest, used to take measurements. He became all excited one day when I went to see him because he had received these scales that normally weight babies. He used to weight my cock, then my balls and then he would weight them both. I thought all the guys got the same treatment. He used to write down the weight etc. and keep notes. He used to make me cum and say he needed samples. Sometimes, after I came he would re-weight my cock and balls. I&#39;ve had guys since then worship my cock and liked to weight it as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HairyTattedThick
1

13788

Guest
3XL:
Originally posted by EDDIEUK@Nov 6 2004, 03:19 AM
Glad to see there are other scientists here. Both of you realize that String Theory will change all these calculations slightly.
[post=262626]Quoted post[/post]​

Woa&#33; If it comes after the Bohr model of the atom, I really don&#39;t want to get that deep&#33;
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
Well, if there were a way to test string theory, I would support it. And quantum mechanics has nothing to do with 300-pound objects.