How important is it that a guy you're with be able to ejaculate?

[BetterFuture]

When you're having sex with a guy, how important is it to you that he can produce ejaculate when he orgasms? If he orgasms while inside your vagina, I guess it wouldn't be as noticeable until nothing leaks out. But what about blowjobs with no cum when he orgasms? What about handjobs with no cum? Other things with no cum? I know some women have a "cum fetish"... but I'm curious if 'no cum at all' is a deal breaker for any of you.

 

[TinyPrincess]

Not at all - on the contrary I would say - it wouldn't mess my hair up

 

[BetterFuture]

Thanks for replying @TinyPrincess .... I was starting to think that I somehow made this sound too pervy and no one wanted to touch it.

I probably should have initially included a little more information as to why I was asking... but I was shy to admit that this question was about me. I've been having increasing problems urinating due to an enlarged prostate and I met with a surgeon who can help fix that by removing some excess tissue, but the most significant side effect is retrograde ejaculation (it goes into the bladder instead of out of the penis). I'm done having children, so that aspect isn't a problem. But I am a little hesitant to not have "normal sexual function". But in the end, I do a lot more urinating than I do ejaculating, so I'll probably opt to have the surgery.

 

[EllieP]

Honestly, I could do without the mess. As long as the feeling is there for you then it sounds like a pretty sweet deal.

As for ejaculation during intercourse, it would make little difference to me as I couldn't tell if there was emission or not except afterwards during clean-up.

But it sounds like a win-win situation. I would not miss the mess.

Good luck with it. My brother-in-law is facing the same decision.

 

[BetterFuture]

Thanks for replying @EllieP ... not an easy decision for me, but the "I would not miss the mess" is encouraging....