The "selfish" accusation is also difficult to comprehend...
I did not call it selfish... I called it self absorbed.
There is no doubt that killing oneself is an act of self absorption.
Misery, itself, is predicated upon dwelling on your own internal state to the exclusion of the external.
Anyone unhappy with life is simply far too busy thinking about how they WISH it were, rather than simply accepting how it is... they are far too busy obsessing over their OWN experience to be interested in the experience of others.
I do not think that this is indicative of "selfishness" per se... I think it is indicative of Obsessive Compulsive disorders of the mind...
Life is not a gift. For the overwhelming majority of people, nay, even animals, for the overwhelming majority of the time, it is a degrading, miserable experience. Who wants to live in a world with Interest Rates? Not I! I joke.
You make an unsupported assertion... a bullshit one at that. PROVE that statement...
I have been to some of the more shitholish parts of this planet and you know what the people who live there do?
They laugh.
They tell jokes, they delight in their children. They marvel at the stars.
When you are miserable... you are only thinking about your OWN suffering... hence the self centered nature of the argument against suicide.
Sure life has suffering... so the fuck what?
That you argue that that makes life miserable only reveals that YOU feel that life OUGHT to be otherwise... or even could be otherwise...
It can't.
Get over it and get over yourself.
You should offer examples of people killing themselves for NON-selfish reasons... but there aren't many...
A man killing himself because he has inoperable cancer and is unwilling to bankrupt his family in a vain cause might be doing it for nobel reasons...
But is the man is killing himself because he doesnlt want to have to face the year of pain and suffering that comes with dying of cancer... then he is killing himself for a self centered motive.
What did uncle Arthur Schopenhauer say?
I concur.
Schopenhauer was an ass.
His argument is idiotic... the animal being eaten is not suffering that experience its WHOLE life.
You can not measure the value of a decade of life by the last half hour.
The argument is the same as saying you might as well not read anything nor write anything since it always ends in a period anyway.
...And there is no comparison of the lives of snails and deer to human beings...
Who is eating YOU?
No one.
You have a mind capable of stellar abstraction and nuance.
YOU
choose to symbolize your experience of life as either feast or famine.
You can CHOOSE to see life as a wonderous knowing of reality...albeit brief and painful,
Or you can choose to see it as this piece of shit you were given with the knowledge it would be taken away.
Given that you have the choice... choosing the latter seems the stupid selection.
Fuck Schopenhauer
D.H. Lawrence said:
"I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
Without ever having felt sorry for itself."
Richard Bach wrote:
"“Anyone desperate enough for suicide...should be desperate enough to go to creative extremes to solve problems: elope at midnight, stow away on the boat to New Zealand and start over, do what they always wanted to do but were afraid to try.”
You are free to kill yourself if you choose... I could care less... make room for someone who appreciates their life...
And I am free to conclude that doing so makes you a self absorbed ass.
And guess who gets the last word on that?