How much foreskin do you have? (UPDATED w/ More Choices)
- Thread starter matt121matt121
- Start date
Restoring. My CI is confusing. I’m not sure I was actually circumcised, maybe something else. I WAS modified but I don’t know how. I don’t match full circ, I don’t think I match partial. My skin is also, from the what I can tell, unusually wide.
Done 3 months premature.
Done 3 months premature.
That is very interesting. I would have guessed you were uncircumcised. What do you mean when you say your skin is unusually wide?
I took the trouble to analyze the data emerging from this survey. Specifically, I refer only to the results inherent to uncircumcised boys. First it must be clarified that, as was predictable, the most common type of coverage of the glans (and therefore the length of the foreskin) is the number 9 (with almost 34% of the votes). I state that, from now on, when I write "numbers" are those of the "coverage index" taken also into consideration by the survey. Returning to the data, in the second place we find the number 7 (with about 17% of the votes). Obviously, on the contrary, the least voted numbers are 1 and 2, with not even 1%. If you then want to group the numbers of the "coverage index" to get a better overview, you must proceed in this way. The numbers from 1 to 3 represent the group of the "glans always exposed" (A), from 4 to 6 we have a "partially covered or uncovered glans" (B), from 7 to 8 there is the group of men with "glans always covered" (but with the urinary meatus that can occasionally be partly visible) (C) and finally from 9 to 10 we have a "glans totally covered with very long prepuce " (also called "overhang") (D). Referring to the results of the survey, Group A took 5.7% of the votes, Group B 19.8%, Group C 28.9% and Group D 45.6%. It is therefore evident, further reducing the previous classification, that the numbers of the "coverage index" between 7 and 10 are those, aesthetically speaking, more widespread, with a total of 74.5% of the votes. In fact, as you know, most of the uncircumcised boys have a foreskin that usually keeps the glans completely covered when the penis is flaccid. On the contrary, the numbers of the "coverage index" between 1 and 6 are less frequent among men (they have in fact obtained 25.5% of the votes). However, this allows two considerations to be made. First of all, it is the confirmation that the boys with a glans always partially or completely uncovered, without circumcision, are a minority. However, and this is the other consideration, it is not a small minority. We speak at least 20% of voters (if we refer only to those who claim to have a short foreskin that never covers the entire glans), a figure that can increase to over 25% of people, if we also consider those who say to always have the glans completely exposed. In other words, it is an important percentage (equal to 1/5 or 1/4 of the voters) that can not be labeled as "residual minority"...
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2019
- Posts
- 3,310
- Media
- 67
- Likes
- 8,594
- Points
- 258
- Location
- Davenport, FL, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
I was cut neonatally. Definitely I resent that fact.
Fast forward 55 years, I restored...
Before restoring: Flaccid C1 Erect C2
After restoring: Flaccid C9 Erect C8
There are photos in my gallery only supporting After Restoring. I restored years ago when it would have been difficult to obtain photos of before.
As a result, I cannot complete the poll.
Fast forward 55 years, I restored...
Before restoring: Flaccid C1 Erect C2
After restoring: Flaccid C9 Erect C8
There are photos in my gallery only supporting After Restoring. I restored years ago when it would have been difficult to obtain photos of before.
As a result, I cannot complete the poll.
Indeed. No idea why some people find the need to bring up dead threads (poster above you).
Similar threads
