How Rare is the Big Dicked Man?

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
2% sounds about right.

It sure SEEMS like more, but there are a few possible reasons for that that I can think of:

- men with large penises might have more partners;
- men with large penises might be less shy about showing off; and
- very few people can tell 6" from 7", and 7" from 8", without measuring.
 

Hotlicks

1st Like
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Posts
38
Media
4
Likes
1
Points
151
Location
Michigan
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Why would I want to build up some other guy's self esteem? This is why American men wear HUGE baggy shorts to the beach. They have the mansion, the Ferrari and the trophy wife but cannot buy a large cock.

Everyone wears those f' in board shorts so the millionaires and lawyers can hide from the rest of us that they are hung like a ten year old boy.

Having a big dick is like having big tits. Flaunt it if you got it.

Their wife or boyfriend has to buy a dildo over 8" to get off when they are not home. Just like their kids have to have an underling prepare his financial reports because he was 'graduated' from college because the bill was paid in full each semester. C'mon Johnny, get your Dad to make another endowment and you can get your diploma...

Now we are going to tell guys that it is O.K. to have a small dick because a big one is so rare it is almost a birth defect? Get real. Whose dicks?

I'm Cherokee/English/Scottish. My three brothers and I are all over 8" and my Dad is knocking on 10. In the Native American and African American races, a long, thick dick is normal.

In Europe, men wear speedos because they know it is technique most women require. Half the women I've been with did not like me to thrust fully and made it impossible for me to get off. The other half needed a man like me for them to get off vaginally.

There are plenty of men out there with big dicks, but they are not found on college campuses participating in research studies, written by grad students from Yoga Vagina Land. :eek:
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
114
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I guess it has just been my luck to have come across a large number of men who have exceeded my length and girth my fair margins---given that I didn't get to have sex with the majority of them, they served mostly to demean my self image...:rolleyes:. Sounds like a cruel joke by the unverse on me.:tongue:
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Measuring- take a ruler along the TOP side of the erect penis, beginning at where you erection connects to your lower abdomen. Do NOT press the ruler 2 or 3 inches into your stomach, that's just being stupid. This is how you get a topside, non-bonepressed measurement. All you guys claiming to be over 10" sound ridiculous, to say the least.

The Kinsey Report had a sample size of around 5000, if memory serves. It was by far the study with the largest sample size, I personally prefer it to any study I've read that's been done since.

If you follow the figures of how the larger numbers get exponentially smaller (The Bell Curve, and all), without doing the math again, I seem to remember that dicks over 10" being around one on a couple hundred thousand, and over 12", probably only a hundred or so on the planet.
Oh yeah, I'm just so sure that every n00b who joins is a complete anomaly, just as much as I believe every woman on here has had multiple partners over 10".:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Still, I'll watch and wait for the thread to continue, and at least twelve more guys decline to read the earlier pages, and go on to post that THEY are over 10". Anyone wanna give me two to one?
 

B_hungnate

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Posts
214
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
163
Age
41
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Measuring- take a ruler along the TOP side of the erect penis, beginning at where you erection connects to your lower abdomen. Do NOT press the ruler 2 or 3 inches into your stomach, that's just being stupid. This is how you get a topside, non-bonepressed measurement. All you guys claiming to be over 10" sound ridiculous, to say the least.

The Kinsey Report had a sample size of around 5000, if memory serves. It was by far the study with the largest sample size, I personally prefer it to any study I've read that's been done since.

If you follow the figures of how the larger numbers get exponentially smaller (The Bell Curve, and all), without doing the math again, I seem to remember that dicks over 10" being around one on a couple hundred thousand, and over 12", probably only a hundred or so on the planet.
Oh yeah, I'm just so sure that every n00b who joins is a complete anomaly, just as much as I believe every woman on here has had multiple partners over 10".:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Still, I'll watch and wait for the thread to continue, and at least twelve more guys decline to read the earlier pages, and go on to post that THEY are over 10". Anyone wanna give me two to one?

Sounds good, I'll buy what you said. Most women I've gotten with say I'm the biggest guy they've had and I'm "only" 8 in. Also to mention it again, sometimes people think I'm bigger because they're so used to guys who lie or don't measure right. I think Zora is right. Oh and also I don't look at too many photos here but I saw a few where guys said they're like 10 in. and they look smaller than me so I know they're not really 10 in.
 

Valkyriessong

Just Browsing
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Posts
72
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Location
..
Honestly average sized guys seem kind of large to me but perhaps that's just because I've never seen a 7+ inch man outside of porn. I mean, I know 7+ inch guys exist obviously - this site is proof of that - but there's a certain amount of unreality to the situation from my personal experience.

If I saw a guy packing 7 inches or more it'd seem akin to catching sight of a mythical beast like a unicorn.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
I guess it has just been my luck to have come across a large number of men who have exceeded my length and girth my fair margins---given that I didn't get to have sex with the majority of them, they served mostly to demean my self image...:rolleyes:. Sounds like a cruel joke by the unverse on me.:tongue:


Why?

I meet girls with bigger boobs than me all the time. I meet girls who are prettier than me, have better jobs, went further in their education- Jesus, there HAS to be room for me to be okay too, even though I'm not the very best in every category at all times.

I wish you guys just weren't so darned competitive, you just kill yourselves with that shit! Are you really saying you can only have fun if your dick is the biggest? I'd find that very limiting. I have an "average size" figure, a bit on the heavy side if anything. I don't think of myself as less than, just because I'm not a "10". Surely women who don't look like Angelina Jolie are still acceptable. Same with guys, you shouldn't be holding yourself to impossible standards, and finding yourself lacking.

If you're saying that others are turning you down based on your size, then perhaps it's time to review your friends. What I've found a lot is that I project my fears a lot more than I think I do. When I feel like I look ugly, don't you know people feel fine and justified to come up and comment on my scars or fat. When I feel better, they never say shit. On the rare occasion that someone calls me fat when I'm dressed up and feeling good, I have no problem telling them what an ass they are for saying so.
 

No_Strings

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Posts
3,968
Media
0
Likes
181
Points
283
Location
Dubai (United Arab Emirates)
Well, since joining this site I now consider myself the upper portion of average, and am completely satisfied with my size. Hanging with the big boys tells me I'm a small yet significant distance below the cut-off point for the 'elite', I don't find any shame in that and it makes me feel a damn sight better than before.

Unfortunately a large majority of my own sexual experiences were before I took the time to enlighten myself, and hence we were both as clueless as each other at the time. :rolleyes:

But, from my own personal experiences, I am average in girth, and towards the lower end in length.
A straight, 18 year old males experiences with erect penii is hardly a legitimate stratified sample, but the affect it's had on my self-esteem whilst growing up is probably irreversible. :redface:

I'm more than accepting and aware of the statistics that MZ posted, but 4.84" does seem awfully low for an average girth measurement.
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
114
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Why?

I meet girls with bigger boobs than me all the time. I meet girls who are prettier than me, have better jobs, went further in their education- Jesus, there HAS to be room for me to be okay too, even though I'm not the very best in every category at all times.

I wish you guys just weren't so darned competitive, you just kill yourselves with that shit! Are you really saying you can only have fun if your dick is the biggest? I'd find that very limiting. I have an "average size" figure, a bit on the heavy side if anything. I don't think of myself as less than, just because I'm not a "10". Surely women who don't look like Angelina Jolie are still acceptable. Same with guys, you shouldn't be holding yourself to impossible standards, and finding yourself lacking.

If you're saying that others are turning you down based on your size, then perhaps it's time to review your friends. What I've found a lot is that I project my fears a lot more than I think I do. When I feel like I look ugly, don't you know people feel fine and justified to come up and comment on my scars or fat. When I feel better, they never say shit. On the rare occasion that someone calls me fat when I'm dressed up and feeling good, I have no problem telling them what an ass they are for saying so.

HUGS!
I was MOSTLY joking about it, but that has been my experience.:smile: Honestly, and this is the God's honest truth, the ONLY reason I have ever wanted a bid dick, was so that, when life got shitty, I would always have something tangible to see that was mine, that society valued, that couldn;t be taken away from me. Sort of an "Well, at least I've still got THIS" moment. I have never been condemned for my size, nor praised, either. My penis has always been a non-topic. And, really, since I am not having sex with anybody anymore, having a big dick as a means to attract others is really a moot point. But I still reserve the right to laugh and joke about the subject.:biggrin1:
 

Lordpendragon

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Posts
3,814
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
MZ's stats are almost certainly correct.

And whilst some do like length :wink: , girth is at least as an important component - so why are guys so hung up on the one measurement? :confused:

Volume makes for big, long makes for long.

Someone did a volume chart a while back, it was interesting to me at least that 8x6 was twice as much cock as 6x5.
 

Nitrofiend

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Posts
892
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
163
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
My girlfriend has seen more than a dozen erect dicks, and while she's seen one that was longer than me (7.25" non bone-pressed), she has yet to see one that's been thicker than me. And considering that I'm 6.75" non bone-pressed, and a bit over 7" when bone-pressed (which I count because the extra half inch or so is not difficult to access and is used for sex in many positions), it puts me at second place in length within a sample of over 20 guys. And I'm number one in girth at 5.8" around.

Considering the notion that the above statistics become average on a site encompassing numerous people with 7+ length and 5.5+ girth, I see myself as being one standard deviation below the "elite" as No_Strings so eloquently put it. And that's fine, because I like things like anal and not torturing people too much :cool:.

Also it'd be a waste right now since my girlfriend can barely take more than 6.5" in length. A half inch above is fine because the discomfort satisfies her masochistic streak, but any more and it's too much to handle and part of me would be left out in the cold :(.
 

Blocko

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
687
Media
0
Likes
13
Points
238
Sexuality
No Response
Given the Kinsey study is self measuring and assumed to be high by at least half an inch, well those statistics are probably...

The lifestyle study was staff measured (but is also thought to be generous due to the fact that the volunteers may have been self-selecting) shows that your chance of an 8.5 is LESS than 1%. The sample size isn't as big as Kinsey's though.

The academic/scientific staff measured studies actually have averages even lower than the lifestyle study... and generally hover much closer to 5 inches than 6... so you can imagine the REAL proportion of 8.5 inchers is pretty low.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Given the Kinsey study is self measuring and assumed to be high by at least half an inch, well those statistics are probably...

The lifestyle study was staff measured (but is also thought to be generous due to the fact that the volunteers may have been self-selecting) shows that your chance of an 8.5 is LESS than 1%. The sample size isn't as big as Kinsey's though.

The academic/scientific staff measured studies actually have averages even lower than the lifestyle study... and generally hover much closer to 5 inches than 6... so you can imagine the REAL proportion of 8.5 inchers is pretty low.


I agree with this. Kinsey was a self-measured study, but you also have to remember that it was "back in the day" during a time when bragging about size was not the sport it is now. I'd say a half inch overestimation is still fair to assume. None of the other staff-measured studies have had near the sample size, some under 100! The Lifestyles "study" was a joke.

We agree implicitly on our conclusions, nonetheless.